The Official Blog Of Edward Cline

Month: January 2018

The OIC’s Censorship

Thuggish organizations like Antifa do the grunt work and fist-swinging for the
Organization of Islamic Conference (formerly Cooperation) OIC.  Masked and hooded, Antifa shuts down unwanted
speech and speakers that question and reveal the Left’s totalitarian means and
ends, and physically
attack
s its supporters. The OIC doesn’t need to send Islamic propagandists
here, though it has a legion of them, such as CAIR,
the ISNA,
the MSA,
and the ICNA.  

Clueless or indifferent social
media owners do the work of Sharia
and the OIC, too, such as Mark  Zuckerberg, who, among
his many, many faults, promised Germany’s Angela  Markel 
to help police
the German Internet
to crush criticism of her immigration policies.

Members of the OIC are
definably criminal psychopaths. They want their Islamic/Sharia fantasies to
come true, to show how Islam is “superior” to all other faiths and ideas, regardless;
they wish their diktats about what may or may not be said (mostly may not) to
come to fruition.  They work to impose
Sharia on the West, and globally, for the sake of exerting power over their
betters. Their demented reward is to feel omnipotence for having the West under
their command. They’re akin to the mad scientist of the TV series “Gotham” who
proves his electrical talents and his alleged existential efficacy by
electrocuting people. 

I made the remark on Gatestone
that sentenced criminals in France pass on their jihadist philosophy to new
criminals because being a criminal is
copasetic to their approach to life and prison dawah would help to “justify” and
understand a new prisoner’s incarceration. 

Converting to Islam
by prisoners is a way to rationalize one’s criminal predilections and
character.  “I rape women, rob
people, and attack them.”

The organization states that it is “the
collective voice of the Muslim world” and works to “safeguard and
protect the interests of the Muslim world in the spirit of promoting
international peace and harmony.”


Note that it is the “collective voice of the
Muslim world,” and not of anyone else’s world or voice: only the Muslim worlds and
voice.

Outspoken opponents of Islam and the Islamization
of a Western country throughout Europe, in this case, Britain, are arrested,
punished, and duct-taped to teach them and other opponents a lesson that one
may not oppose the OIC with impunity.
Britain First leader deputy Jayda Fransen gave
her speech in Ireland and then was flown to Britain to face charges. In
Finland, Finnish politician Sebastian
Tynkkynen
was arrested and fined for posting anti-Islam posts on Facebook.
It was not the first time. If you endorse the OIC’s Sharia agenda, all you need
to do is “complain” about someone’s social media post.  The pseudo-omniscient speech police will knock
on the “offender’s” door and haul him away.

Western governments
do the dirty business that the OIC does not want to risk performing itself. It
might give everyone else the wrong impression that it is malign. It’s better to
let Western governments to smash opponents in the name of “law and order.”

Meanwhile, in Germany’s
new censorship law, which has introduced state censorship
on social media platforms, came into effect on October 1, 2017.

Barack
Obama
ordered that the DHS and other terrorism- fighting U.S. agencies
remove all references to Islam from their documents.

Illegal immigrants a
no-no term, according to CNN
and MSNBC’s Joy
Reid
. The preferred term is “Dreamers.” The change in terminology is
doubtless a side-effect of the OIC’s insistence of”correct” words. Doubtless
those who regard “illegal immigrants” as derogatory and demeaning think that
all people who enter and settle in the U.S ., especially if they are illegal,
as being entitled to respect and rights.

The New York Times, friend of Dreamers, and Sharia


Obama coined the term
“Dreamer” and it caught on with the MSM and the Democrats.

Obama was also President
when two Muslims tried to attack the Garland, TX “Draw Mohammad” event on May
3, 2015. How committed to the Islamic and OIC agenda was he?  Was the attack a secret arrangement between
Obama and FBI Director James Comey?
Comey had been reinstated as FBI director by Obama in 2013 after occupying that
office since 1972, and being reconfirmed by the Senate. 

Given Obama’s demonstrable devotion to Islam
is it too far-fetched to imagine that Comey “Green-Lighted
the Garland  attack, selecting a pliable
FBI agent to communicate closely with the attackers?

Obama said, 

In Cairo,
at Cairo University, I made clear that America is not – and never will be – at war with Islam.”
The future must not belong
to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” (
speech
to United Nations
General Assembly, 2012-09-25)

So, the participants and planners
of the Garland, TX drawing contest had to be taught a lesson. This could not
help but please the OIC, except  that the
attackers, Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi, were killed in the act. Comey had to
have known what the agent, UCE-1 (and other agents) was up to. Had the attack
been successful resulting in multiple casualties, would that have given Obama
the excuse to ban all depictions of Mohammad, and impose censorship? Did he
have knowledge of the FBI-ISIS partnership? Was UCE-1 a rogue FBI agent, with
his own ax to grind?

Bosch Fawstin’s winning image of Mohammad

On March 24, 2015,
an undercover FBI agent (referred to by the FBI as ‘UCE-1’) contacted Hendricks
on social media, posing as a Muslim who was interested in joining the ISIS
cell.
Later,
Just before the event was set to begin, the
FBI sent another email bulletin which contained ‘a list of suspected extremists
who […] were interested in the event.’ The bulletin included information about
‘Simpson’s general interest’ in the event, along with a ‘photo and possible
vehicle license plate,’ but it gave ‘no notice that he might be headed that way
or planning an attack on the draw-Muhammad gathering.’ Former FBI Director
James Comey would later claim that ‘[a]t the time, the FBI had no reason to
believe that Simpson intended to attack the event.’ The Garland Police
Department’s security operations for the event were already underway when the
email bulletin was sent, and was ‘one of many emails sent [to the Department]
on that day,” so “no one saw [the email] until after the attack.’ The numerous
FBI agents on the ground at the event made no effort to alert local law
enforcement officials that Simpson posed an imminent threat.”

Simpson was
under surveillance by the FBI, but its agents had no reason to alert local law
enforcement or the event?

Was UCE-1
the only rogue FBI agent present at the Garland event? Just how many members of
the ISIS-friendly FBI were there in the vicinity? Did they belong to the “secret
society
” that has just been revealed? How many still work for the FBI?
Possibly there is an obscure Federal law that indemnifies agents in the course
of their lawful duties (protecting the agents from lawsuits, while working to
protect the U.S. and its citizens). But I don’t think there is a law that
indemnifies agents who commit treason and sic Muslim agents on Americans. UCE-1
emailed Simpson, “Tear up Texas!”

The whole
FBI role in the Garland attack is shocking and an eye-opener. UCE-1 should be
identified and sent to prison, together with Comey and Obama.

The Venom of the SPLC


The “Palestinians
are a hate group. Across the board in Gaza and the West Bank and elsewhere,
they call for killing Jews and destroying the State of Israel.  
The #Resistance
is a hate group. It refuses to acknowledge the election of Donald Trump, even
to the point of questioning his physical and mental fitness to be President,
and includes in that mantra the implied accusation that Dr. Ronny Jackson, who
examined Trump, is lying. It is willing to say anything to damage Trump, no
matter how irrational and unproven.
Antifa is a
hate group. The visual evidence is ample. Masked thugs attack individuals who
want to see and hear someone the group disapproves of; destroy property with
glee, and calls “fascist” (as though the thugs knew what real “fascists” were
in the past) anyone who opposes them.  Antifa thugs should take Pogo’s complaint to
heart;”We have seen the enemy and he is us.” Not that doing such would give
them second thoughts. Their minds are the property of leftist ideology.
Democratic congressmen who
oppose President Trump comprise a hate group.
Any group that does not
disavow its unremitting, obsessive hatred for Trump is a hate group.
Hate Group map derived from the SPLC
Yet it will not be classified
as a “hate group” by the Southern
Poverty Law
Center (SPLC).  This and
other groups  get a free pass because
they hate Trump and spew their hatred to another level of ranting insanity. My
argument is that any government authority that suppresses freedom of speech
across the globe is a “hate group,” any group that offers “resistance” to
freedom of speech is a “hate group,” any individual who rants irrationality
against President Trump is a one-man “hate group” and could said to be in the
grip of “Trumpophobia.”

Like the saliva of an Indonesian
Komodo dragon
injected into a bite victim, the toxin is supposed to cause a fatal and a certain,
helpless death. The dragons are attracted to the putrefaction of the bodies of
their victims. Much as the Democrats are.

Articles have surfaced that
claim that the SPLC
is by definition a “hate group” itself, because its chief purpose today is to
establish and publish lists of names that hate groups can target for hateful
action. This is a charge which cannot be denied by the SPLC. Virtually the only
time it makes news headlines today is when it has declared certain individuals
– such as Pamela Geller, Richard Spencer,
Ayaan Hirsi Ali – and numerous
blogs that critique Islam, as “Islamophobes” or as “hate groups.” They commit “hate
crimes” and must be sent to the slammer. Never mind that Geller is under a
constant fatwa to behead her, that Spencer was poisoned in Iceland, and that
Hirsi Ali survived the worst of Sharia for a woman, female genital mutilation.
So, what is a “hate crime”?
A hate crime (also
known as a bias-motivated crime or bias crime[1]) is a
prejudice-motivated
crime, usually violent, which occurs when a perpetrator targets a
victim because of his or her membership (or perceived membership) in a certain social
group
or race.
Examples of such groups can include and are
almost exclusively limited to: sex, ethnicity, disability,
language, nationality,
physical appearance, religion, gender
identity
or sexual orientation. Non-criminal actions that
are motivated by these reasons are often called “bias
incidents
“.
“Hate crime” generally refers to criminal acts which
are seen to have been motivated by bias against one or more of the social groups listed above, or
by bias against their derivatives. Incidents may involve physical assault,
damage to property, bullying, harassment, verbal
abuse
or insults,
mate
crime
or offensive graffiti or letters (hate mail).
What is “Islamophobia”? What
is the term’s origin?
The term “Islamophobia” was invented
and promoted in the early 1990s
by the International
Institute for Islamic Thought
(IIIT), a front group of the Muslim
Brotherhood
. Former IIIT member Abdur-Rahman Muhammad — who was with that
organization when the word was formally created, and who has since rejected
IIIT’s ideology — now reveals
the original intent behind the concept of Islamophobia: “This loathsome term is
nothing more than a thought-terminating cliché conceived in the bowels of
Muslim think tanks for the purpose of beating down critics.” In short, in its
very origins, “Islamophobia” was a term designed as
a weapon
to advance a totalitarian cause by stigmatizing critics and
silencing them.

The SPLC and its cultural kin
would say, “Our hate is legitimate,
and justified. It’s for a universal, humanitarian purpose.” In practice and in
fact, it is a tool and a weapon to denigrate anyone who questions the
“peaceful” ends of Islam, and is who is critical of its totalitarian designs
and methods. Anyone who has bothered to examine Islam would almost evidently
fear it and not conclude it was just another “belief system.”  It would be as much as examining a
rattlesnake.

The SPLC apparently is not
bothered by being labeled a “hate group.” Leftists are, by their nature, not
chagrined or embarrassed by the charge of being totalitarian.
The trick the SPLC plays is to
group legitimate criticism with actual hate groups and hope readers do not
wonder why Pamela Geller is linked to the likes of the Skinheads, the Neo-Nazis, and
the KKK.
The venom of the SPLC suits
the MSM because they don’t need to do anything. It fits their agenda. The SPLC
has done the “research” for them. If the SPLC says an individual or group is
driven by hate, that’s the end of their inquiry, other than perhaps taking a brief
glance at the targeted site to confirm that what they see they don’t like and
would prefer to see prohibited and outlawed. Facts. Reason.  Logic. Cause-and-effect.  Syllogisms.  
The Democratic Party

These are all minefields, and any one, of
them, if stepped on by Dems, will explode their arguments and their assumed intellectual
acuity (if they possess any), and expose their substance of straw and old rags
and habitual dissembling lizards. Dems are “fake persons” and “fake”
Congressional representatives. The Dems were in
favor
of perpetuating slavery during and after the Civil War up to the
present. They continue to perpetuate it.

They can always depend on “party-loyalty”
for votes.

Totalitarians vs. Deplorables

Courtesy of Pamela Geller
 and The
Religion of Peace

As an atheist I don’t pal around
with very many Christians. I know plenty of non-practicing Jews. But I know no
Muslims personally. To me, God has the same reality as does Allah, which is no
reality at all. He has less substance than a Martian cloud.

Yet, I still feel compassion
for Christians and Jews being persecuted by Muslims. They just want to be left
alone to utter their hosannas.  I do not
frequent churches or synagogues; because these are not places I’m likely to
encounter any intellectual discourse. However, the ongoing decimation of Jews
and Christians at the hands of Muslims goes virtually unnoticed and reported by
the MSM—in the Mideast and in France and practically any place you care to name.
 
I grew up in a Catholic home,
so anti-Semitism has always been completely alien to me. It has a dozen or more
bogus rationalisms to explain or justify it. “Jews are taking over the world.
Jews run the banking business. Jews want the blood of your children. Jews this
and Jews that, they’re to blame for your misery.”  I guess an anti-Semite will claim that Jews
exterminated the Martians, too. The most ludicrous instance of anti-Semitism is
the Russian propaganda of The
Protocols of the Elders of Zion
. Reading through it I got the sense that I
was reading a pretty awful science fiction novel or a Hollywood script.
The totalitarians in our
midst, such as Senator Chuck
Schumer
, want you to obey, not call him names, and just let him have his
way with you and the rest of the country.
Speaking of deplorables:

Please,
please! Melt the ice!



Close to science fantasy and
the elevation of the omniscient–ill feelings of a cackling bogeyman are the
current and unshakable anti-Trump mentality of the MSM and the daily utterances
of the political establishment, such those by Jeff Flake and Corey Booker.
Outgoing Arizona Republican Sen. Jeff Flake
came under fire for an astonishing attack on President Trump Wednesday, in
which he accused Trump of using Stalinist language and promoting global
instability with his criticism of the media.
‘Comparing the leader of the free world to
murderous dictators is absurd,” Republican National Committee Chairwoman
Ronna McDaniel tweeted. “You’ve gone too far.”
But
Jeff Flake
, a surely appropriately named U.S. senator, was rebutted:
White House Press
Secretary Sarah Sanders shot back at the daily press briefing that Flake had
recently visited Cuba, where he had nice things to say about the authoritarian
government in that country.
“I found it quite interesting that he is
coming out to attack this president considering he’s the one who was recently
defending an actually oppressive regime. He went to Cuba a few weeks ago and
served as a mouthpiece for the oppressive Cuban government.”
She also blamed Flake’s low poll numbers for
his attacks on Trump. Flake announced in October that he will not seek
re-election in 2018.
Sanders could have called
Flake to her podium and in front of everyone called him an idiot to his face.  That would have been better desserts.
In the meantime, Corey Booker
shed tears and  many calories to insult
and attack the head of the DHS:
Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ)
lashed out
at female DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen on Tuesday, lambasting
the secretary as “complicit,” in an emotional outburst that saw
Booker flail about and scream
at Nielsen
in disgust — even suggesting she had limited intellectual
capabilities.
But yet, Democrats, who turned Sens. Kamala
Harris (CA) and Elizabeth Warren (MA) into cult heroes for enduring a fraction
of the abuse Nielsen handled during her grilling at Booker’s hands, were
completely silent on Booker’s unprofessional treatment of Nielsen.
“When…Dick
Durbin
called me, I had tears of rage when I heard about this experience in
that meeting. And for you not to feel that hurt and that pain — and to dismiss
some of the questions of my colleagues saying, ‘I already answered that line of
questions’ — when tens-of-millions of Americans are hurting right now […]
that’s unacceptable to me,” Mr. Booker said.

I
will brainwash Germans,
    They’ll hug Muslims,
        or I’ll jail them!

Perhaps you’ve seen better dramatics in a daytime soap opera. You must
ask yourself: Is there no level to which politicians and the MSM will stoop to
remove Trump from an office he has clearly deserved to occupy? Apparently not.
I have searched for the bottom, but found only sand, sharks, and feeders.

Michael Walsh
commented on the all-purpose, teeny, epileptic vocabulary  of Trump’s enemies:
Note
the profusion of headlines these days that now include “sources say,”
“seems to suggest,” “may,” “reportedly,”
and other weasel words whose plain
meaning is not. The great scheisshole flap originated with
exactly one individual, the proven fabulist Dick Durbin of Illinois, but now
has been accepted as gospel by (as Glenn Reynolds, the Instapundit, says) the
Democratic operatives with bylines. And the great “Russian collusion”
hoax—which I pointed out from day one was a disinformation operation
facilitated by rogue, but high-ranking, members of the intelligence community,
the Democrats, the Clinton campaign, and their hacks and fellow-travelers in the media—has now gossamered away in
the wind, having largely been supplanted by 25th Amendment fantasies, Michael Wolff’s book, and temper tantrums over Norway and
the new tax tables. 
He has clocks on his socks?
That’s enough to finish him!
Mueller to barking up the wrong tree!
The only thing that might lower the perpetual hate-Trump fever today
would be an assassination. The Dems and the MSM would shed ample crocodile
tears but perform Dionysian dances behind the scenes, though perhaps not; they have
dropped all pretence of public decorum. They
not have quite called Dr. Jackson
a liar or a tool of the Trump “conspiracy” to prove
that they is more fit to be President than your average journalist.
Speaking of madness, Al Gore is doing
global warming dances
in the freezing cold. Now that the Fusion and Russian
dossier issue are more or less  kaput he’s
going to have to find a new job, perhaps as a golf caddy or as a dishwasher in
a Washington diner.

Onward Islamic Soldiers


The Sum of all Fears

The
British police
(and the German police) are doing the Muslim Brotherhood’s
work. Their hands are helping to corrupt the West from inside. Britain’s arrest
rate of online and public “Islamophobes” is much higher than the arrest rate of
Muslim anti-Semites and those who advocate jihad without risk of punishment.
Some of these are tried and sent to prison where their jihadist desires are just
reinforced by resident Muslims to wage jihad.
This is in conformance with
the  Muslim Brotherhood Memorandum of
1991:
In
order for Islam
and its Movement to become “a part of the
homeland” in which it lives, “stable” in its land,
“rooted” in the spirits and minds of its people, “enabled”
in the live [sic] of its society and has firmly-established “organizations”
on which the Islamic structure is built and with which the testimony of
civilization is achieved, the Movement must plan and struggle to obtain
“the keys” and the tools of this process in carry [sic] out this
grand mission as a “Civilization Jihadist” responsibility which lies
on the shoulders of Muslims and – on top of them – the Muslim Brotherhood in
this country.
The Terrorist Network in America
The process of
settlement is a “Civilization-Jihadist Proecess” [sic] with all the
word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of
grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within
and
“sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that
it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other
religions. Without this level of understanding, we are not up to this challenge
and have not prepared ourselves for Jihad yet. It is a Muslim’s destiny to
perform Jihad and work wherever he is and wherever he lands until the final
hour comes, and there is no escape from that destiny except for those who chose
to slack. But, would the slackers and the Mujahedeen be equal.
[Bold mine.]
In 2004,
the FBI raided a Muslim Brotherhood
house in northern Virginia and
confiscated a document called “An
Explanatory Memorandum for the General Strategic Goal for the Brothers in North
America
.” The document, presented as evidence in a Hamas-funding trial
in 2008 in Dallas, outlined the Muslim Brotherhood’s strategy to take over
America “from within.”



Islam has been very busy. A random sampling of attacks on Westerners
ought to give, even a Republican, the scope of the assault on the West:
A woman’s face was slashed by a Muslim
in New York’s subway
.
He told cops that he
had slashed the elderly woman with a razor as the D train pulled into the
Broadway-Lafayette station because he
felt threatened
, according to a criminal complaint.

Now, and then: Sieg Heil!

Threatened by an elderly woman? And, in Britain, another
woman’s face was slashed
by an unwelcome Muslim lover:
These are the
appalling injuries suffered by a young mum after she was allegedly slashed from
mouth to ear by her cheating ex-lover.
Siobhan Stevenson’s
former partner allegedly kicked down her door and attacked her with two blades
after she refused to take him back.
He then slashed her
across the face, allegedly telling her he would ‘make sure another man never
looks at her’, the
Daily Record reported
.
Meanwhile, in Austria, jihad
is the rule
of the day; be careful where you go to skate:
Last Saturday, as
every year, the ice disco took place in the Linz Donaupark ice rink. A
13-year-old Austrian was sexually assaulted by four migrants and is now in
shock.
As the “Wochenblick”
learned directly from police circles, the perpetrators are four Afghan asylum
seekers.
They rushed to the
helpless girl and groped her in the genital area. More details about the act
are still unclear, but still follow.
After the sex
attack, the completely distraught girl turned to the security staff, who
immediately alerted the police.
The officials were
able to quickly locate the Afghan perpetrators, they have all been arrested.
Swimming
pool assaults
in Germany and other conquered European countries are common,
in which “asylum seekers” not only avail themselves to what doesn’t exist from their
countries of origin, but feel free to pollute the pools with their own bodily
fluids and evacuations.
Migrants in
Germany are accused of sexually harassing several young girls at a
swimming pool in Essen over the weekend.
Yet more migrants
stand accused of trying to sexually abuse underage girls at a swimming pool in
Germany. In the German town of Essen several girls at an outdoor pool, aged
between 12 and 13 years, are said to have been approached by migrants over the
weekend who tried to sexually abuse them.
Turn the Kuffers’ playlands into sh-holes
Migrants can’t wait to use
the bathroom
. Swimming pools are convenient.
A German swimming
bath has banned migrants from entering the premises after a group of men went
on an obscene rampage, laughing in the faces of pool staff when challenged
about their grotesque behaviour.
A group of migrant
men and women were caught on security camera at the Johannisbad baths
in Zwickau, Saxony engaging in unacceptable behaviour, including masturbating
into the jacuzzi. In separate incidents other groups of migrants were
caught “contaminating” the children’s  training pool by “emptying their bowels
in the water”, and sexually assaulting other bathers, reports Bild.
In London acid
attacks
on random victims are changing the character of a once busy and
charming city:
Such vicious incidents have long been a problem in
several south Asian countries. But in London, the trend has seen a steep and
worrying rise.
According to data from the Metropolitan Police in
London, 454 acid attacks were reported in 2016.
This is a huge increase ( >173%) from the 261
reported attacks in 2015, and almost triple the number of attacks
reported in 2012.
For the six-year period from 2010 to 2016, the
number totals 1,805.
And Sweden, per the Islamization of the
country, now has rape coming out of its ears:
In 1975, the Swedish parliament unanimously decided to
change the former homogeneous Sweden into a multicultural country. Forty years
later the dramatic consequences of this experiment emerge: violent crime has increased by 300%.
If one looks at the number of rapes, however, the
increase is even worse. In 1975, 421 rapes were reported to the police; in 2014, it was 6,620. That is an increase of 1,472%.
Sweden is now number two on the global list of rape
countries. According to a survey
from 2010
, Sweden, with 53.2 rapes per 100,000 inhabitants, is surpassed
only by tiny Lesotho in Southern Africa, with 91.6 rapes per 100,000
inhabitants.
This is not about mythological Europa
being seduced by a bull. In the story, Europa is carried off by Zeus in the
form of a bull to a secret garden, and Europa gives birth to Hermes. In the European
Union
version, Europe is carried off by barbarian hordes and gives birth to
a place in which chaos and brutality are the norm, for the sake of “diversity”
and “tolerance” and the abolition of “whiteness.”
Let us in, say the barbarians: “We bring peace and innovation – excuse
our pig’s eye.”

“Own” Truths vs. Reality

Saudi Arabian
investor Prince Alwaleed bin Talal
Sells used cars and
countries

 “We don’t care about facts. We ignore them.
It’s racist to cite facts. It’s our
feelings that determine what is real or relevant, not facts. What we feel is
the true reality. We have our own
truths. Oprah
said so
.” However, as many “non-#Resistance” commentators have observed,
there is no such thing as one’s “own” truth. There is just reality, or facts.
An individual doesn’t own reality, nor is it true if he does assert he that does.
To him, reality is malleable, changeable,  clay putty to be turned into anything he
wishes, because he  “doubts.” He is the
practicing icon of
Descartes’s
dictum, “I think,
therefore I am
.”  And they don’t care
if they’re called hypocrites. Labels, after all, mean nothing to these doyens.

Virginia
governor
Terry McAuliffe (D.) swore
on national TV that if he runs for President against President Trump in 2020,
he’ll hit Trump, if he stands behind him, as he did to Hillary, and
knock him down
. He also said it earlier on an independent  boast on the Virginia state site. “You’d
have to pick him up from the floor
.” However:
Under United State
Code Title 18, Section 871, it is a felony for an individual to “knowingly and
willfully” make a “threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily
harm upon the President of the United States.” The punishment for this crime is
severe, with a possible 5-year prison sentence and a fine of $250,000.
Doubtless the Secret Service would intervene immediately and cuff him
on serious charges, one of which would be assaulting the President.  Synonymous to treason. Jail time for the
pugnacious governor. McAuliffe’s madness is indicative of the rampant,
emotion-driven hatred exhibited for Trump and his supporters by him, by most
Democrats, and by the MSM.  All because his
supports helped  Trump wipe the floor and
used a broom to sweep her from presidential aspirations. McAuliffe and
#Resistance all suffer from reckless delusions of wanting to be like Rocky. But all they ever do is
float like a butterfly
but never sting like a bee. Trump seems to be immune to their snickers and
sneers.
The best way to confuse a Democrat or anyone who professes to be a Progressive
is to insist on arguments from facts. To separate his feelings from what is. He’ll refuse to do it. He’ll sputter
and look demonic and spray you with his drool.  End of argument. He’ll be so divorced from
reality you could convince him that a bar of butter is a bar of gold. Asking a
Progressive to think is like asking a turtle for the square root of 2.
Head gear  on sale at
Wal-Mart
For example, the Democrats wanted a study that would prove that illegal
gun sales were the bane of the country. But when the General Accounting Office
concluded that such sales were hard to quantify, and also because too often gun
sellers were reluctant to answer a question by a government agency, the Dems
asked for a “better” study.
Kerry Picket of the Daily
Caller
wrote January 15th:
Democratic
lawmakers don’t like the methodology that the Government Accountability Office
used to find that it’s difficult to buy firearms illegally on the internet.
The
Democrats requested the report on online gun sales, but now they seem to want a
new study to be conducted with different methodology.
“Well,
when we send something to GAO, we allow them to do the process that they think
makes sense. But we do have a disagreement with their methodology, and we’re
going to go and sit down with them and discuss how to get at the problem,”
Hawaii Democratic Sen. Brian Schatz told The Daily Caller last Thursday.
He
continued, “Our view is that it is still absolutely possible to legally
purchase guns online. The way that the GAO analysts did it is, they announced
to the sellers, ‘Hey I’d like to buy some guns illegally.’ I think the sellers
are wise enough to that to decline, so we did not agree with their methodology,
but we’ll continue to work on this issue.”
The
GAO report stated that its investigators tried to illegally purchase firearms
on both the “Surface Web” and the “Dark Web.” The investigators “revealed their
status to the sellers as individuals who would ordinarily be banned from buying
these weapons legally,” according to the report.
“Private
sellers on Surface Web gun forums and in classified ads were unwilling to sell
a firearm to our agents that self-identified as being prohibited from
possessing a firearm,” the GAO said.

An enemy of snowflake butterflies:
Cassius Marcellus Clay, Jr.
(later Muhammad Ali)
So, if sellers were unwilling to sell prohibited
guns to government agents, it warps the study in a way the Dems don’t want to
see. They’d rather the sellers sell their guns indiscriminately, to “Prove”
that gun sales are unwelcome.
Of
the 72 attempts agents made to purchase firearms on the Surface Web, 56 sellers
refused to complete a transaction once we revealed that either the shipping
address was across state lines or that we were prohibited by law from owning
firearms.”
In
the other cases, the investigators’ website was frozen or they encountered
suspected scammers.
Ultimately, the GAO
is “not making recommendations in this report.”
To the Dems, the conclusions were unwelcome. The reported facts did not
fit into their ideal conclusion. They’d rather see a fairy land of guns salting
the country in private hands and deserving of regulation (or more regulations).
Reality is unacceptable to them. When Obama’s Attorney General, Eric Holder,
rigged “Fast
& Furious
,” there were no such complaints or whining. Holder eventually
was revealed as the shyster he is, to help advance Obama’s crusade to disarm
all those “gun clingers” Obama demonized.
There has always been a question of how Barack Obama attended Harvard
and how well or badly he did there. Many of his personal records are still
sealed, including his academic records.  In
September 2008 Ken
Timmerman
asks the question.
How exactly did
Barack Obama pay for his Harvard Law School education?
The way the Obama
campaign has answered the question was simply hard work and student loans.
But new questions
have been raised about Obama’s student loans and Obama’s ties to a radical
Muslim activist who reportedly was raising money for Obama’s Harvard studies
during the years 1988 to 1991.
The allegations
first surfaced in late March, when former Manhattan Borough president Percy Sutton told a New
York cable channel that a former business partner who was “raising money” for
Obama had approached him in 1988 to help Obama get into Harvard Law School.
In the interview,
Sutton says he first heard of Obama about twenty years ago from Kalid
Al-Mansour, (not the Saudi soccer player) a Black Muslim and Black Nationalist
who was a “mentor” to the founders of the Black Panther party at the time the
party was founded in the early 1960s.
Sutton described
al-Mansour as advisor to “one of the world’s richest men,” Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin
Talal
.
Timmerman’s article winds up at a dead end, because Percy Sutton’s
relatives denied he ever said that Mansour had anything to do with Obama, even
though Sutton said Obama knew Mansour in an interview.  But the video connection between Sutton and
Mansour and then to Obama must be archived somewhere.
Prince
Alwaleed catapulted to fame in the United States after the September 11
attacks, when New York mayor Rudy Guiliani refused his $10 million check to
help rebuild Manhattan, because the Saudi prince hinted publicly that America’s
pro-Israel policies were to blame for the attacks.
Sutton
knew Al-Mansour well, since the two men had been business partners and served
on several corporate boards together.
As
Sutton remembered, Al-Mansour was raising money for Obama’s education and
seeking recommendations for him to attend Harvard Law School.
Whether or not Talal was a secret funder of Obama’s Harvard years is an
open question. It is very possible he was Obama’s Harvard “sugar daddy.” It still
remains a subject of speculation. Though, given
Talal’s investments
and holdings, he is too likely a candidate. Pittance
like the cost of Harvard Law School tuition would be small drop in the bucket
to someone like Talal, practically invisible, but Occidental College in California and Harvard
would conform to the Muslim Brotherhood’s goal of conquering America by stealth
and by blatant political action by an “Islamic Candidate.”

would be a good, long-term investment
in the political grooming of a man who wished to “transform” America and
subject it to the whims and demands of Islam. Funding Obama’s education at

High-profile Saudi
Arabian investor Prince Alwaleed bin Talal owns chunks of private and public
companies in the U.S., Europe and the Middle East through Kingdom Holding Co.,
5% of which is listed on the Saudi Stock Exchange (he is listed as owning the
other 95%). Holdings include stakes in the ride-sharing firm Lyft, social media
firm Twitter, Citigroup, hotel management company Four Seasons Hotels &
Resorts, the swanky Hotel George V in Paris and the Savoy Hotel in London.
Will Never Give In
Reports of Islamic attacks come to this site daily. It is especially discouraging
to read about what is happening in Germany and England (https://mail.google.com/mail/#inbox/160fe3bdb148d970
and from https://mail.google.com/mail/#inbox/160fdb8e65a28d1c). How to fight
the Islamic Swamp and its clueless Lefty allies? Write. Use that freedom to
oppose and fight the “inevitable.” Never submit.  Never
give in
.

Hollywood RIP

A
tragic hero

This column is not about Islam
per se, but it is about the growing decrepitude of Hollywood fare.  In a sense, it is about the secular version of
Sharia, to conform to
the nihilism of the Hollywood left. As Sharia’s purpose is to obliterate all
personal values and make them Allah’s, the Hollywood left is busy obliterating
them in its own manner. The decrepitude is part and parcel of current trends in
the culture. 

But, what is Sharia?
Total and unqualified submission to the will
of Allah (God) is the
fundamental tenet of Islam: Islamic law is therefore the expression of Allah’s
command for Muslim society and, in application, constitutes a
system of duties that are incumbent upon a Muslim by virtue of his religious
belief….
The second major distinction between the
Sharīa and Western legal systems is the result of the Islamic concept of law as
the expression of the divine will. With the death of the Prophet Muhammad in
632, communication of the divine will to human beings ceased so that the terms
of the divine revelation were henceforth fixed and immutable.
In short, Mohammad died, and
all divine revelations ceased. His will ceased to be a power.  Men would  obey his will and utterances without question.
This is, on the face of it, pure hokum. If he’s dead, he has no power over
anyone’s actions or beliefs – except in those who want to believe in a ghost in
the sky and could not live without believing there is a ghost.
The purpose of the Left’s
brand of Sharia is to persuade one to conform to or compel one to surrender  one’s 
personal values, and reason for living – for the state. For the “divine
will” of the new elites, the SJWs, who will denigrate every value you might
have to ensure that you have no values but their own.
My correspondent has plenty to say about what’s happening in popular
culture. In this instance, she discusses the decline and ruination of The Walking Dead  (TWD), in which several of the key characters,
who were heroes and objects of viewer adulation, have been diminished, changed
over for the worse, or given nothing significant to do.  Sharia, Hollywood style, is being subtly
introduced into the characters’ actions and motives. Fans may not notice it,
but they will be fed Koranic “wisdom.” “Don’t be angry with your nemesis; be
tolerant and make friends.” The main event, several seasons into the future, will be
Rick, quoting the Koran, and forgiving
Negan, one of the most villainous and evil characters in cinematic history, for
all the deaths he has consciously caused by his own hand, especially the deaths
of some of Rick’s most valued friends, with a baseball bat.
I am not a Creature Feature or Zombie fan by any means, but years ago the
original episodes appeared on Netflix
and I tried them. I was surprised by becoming interested in some of the main
characters, their development, and their struggles, and continued watching the
series until recently. it had become less and less interesting as time went on,
but when it introduced Muslim characters, I quit the series. It was when the
first Muslim character quoted the Koran:
“May my mercy prevail over my wrath.” I was certain that, because the character
of Rick, a main character, was growing more and more mushier, unpredictable, and
ambiguous (in a word, unstable), he would eventually adopt the Koran quotation as his rule of life.
(The closest I can find to this quotation, which may have been altered by the
series writers, is  “As to punishment, I
inflict it on anyone I will, but My mercy embraces everything. “ (203-204)
Lots of good
analysis here (though I’m wary of anyone who likes Negan and thinks Siddiq [one
of two Muslim characters] has “potential”), on specifics of how
TWD is being ruined. I’ve thought about the more basic issues a lot, with
TWD, and the series I’m upset over, and the new Star Wars movie which I don’t personally
care about but has that fan base so upset. I see in common the
destruction of heroic characters fans love, a message that we are going to ram
our Social Justice Warriors and Muslims and white-Western-male-hating identity
politics and gender-bending and militant feminism down your throats
whether you like it or not, and we are going to so muddle and destroy the
characters you do care about, the ones who have struggled to achieve heroic
status, who are unshakable in confronting and destroying — not “showing
mercy” to – evil.
You will have no
one left to genuinely admire
. By chaotic muddling of behavior as in the
recent TWD episodes they destroy coherence of plot and characterization.
In “my” series a major character’s heroic actions were trashed, in
TWD we’re seeing uncharacteristic behavior from Maggie, Daryl, Carl, Rick,
Carol [in TWD] and others in dark, poorly filmed scenes, and apparently the SW
universe has descended into total Social Justice Warrior chaos. Instances
of producers betraying competent (and expensive) actors as in Chandler
Rigg’s case have also turned up in all 3 series. (Mark Hamill of SW has been
openly denouncing this.) 
Scott Gimple,
“Showrunner” of The Walking Dead, has run the hit series to the ground, veering
 it in a direction that makes little or
no sense to just about everyone. The series fan base is not very happy with it,
some of it articulating their
objections
, some of them not but still expressing
some valid reservations.

Al Gore: A first-class blowhard.
It isn’t just Robert Mueller in pursuit of a Russian mirage and the Pussy
Hat brigade not marching in support of the women of Iran that
have diverted
news coverage from what’s important to focus on. It isn’t just Al Gore
claiming that the freezing temperatures are evidence of global warming.
It’s the popular culture, as
my correspondent has explained, that has been appropriated by the Social
Justice Warriors. The SJWs, who are determined to “transform” the
culture into
a closet of ironing boards. They work hard to deny anyone heroes, except
for
themselves, who have decided that they are the real “heroes,” out to
save the
world from Donald Trump, Confederate statues, and male ”whiteness.”
Netflix has
contributed to this trend.
For your boredom, Netflix has dozens of films which may or may not have
appeared on TV or in a theater, but which were eventually relegated to Netflix
status. “Bright,  is a redo of “Alien Nation” from the 1990s. Zoo,” is a remake of “Day of the Animals
from 1977. Like “Alien Nation,” “Bright” is a lesson in racial and cultural
diversity. The cast, headed by Will Smith, has as a police partner an alien in
Los Angeles who has a skin condition aggravated, it seems, by being bitten by a
thousand rats. In “Zoo,” the story is no longer a vanishing ozone layer that
drives animals crazy. The main cast the redo pursues the cause of animals, wild
or domesticated, acquiring intelligence and making war on man. The cast flies
all over the world looking for the cause, investigating bats, spiders, lions,
dogs, cats, rhinos, and elephants in Patagonia. The outbreak turns into a
global epidemic. Animals attack and kill thousands of people. It is caused by
something in commercial animal food made by an evil corporation. I watched
enough of it to detect where it was going. Then, humans bitten by the predators
begin to turn into monsters. When a sloth was able to communicate with spiders,
and cause a 20-story building to collapse, I gave up. All Hollywood can do any
more is take the forgettable films of the past and re-package them to be “relevant”
and inevitably forgettable.  The result
is unrelieved boredom.
 It isn’t Netflix’s fault that
there is so little to offer. It just packages whatever is produced or which
fails to grab the headlines and tries to sell it. It’s Hollywood in the tight
grip of the Left, in the crusading smash-and-grab nihilism of the SJWs.  We’re going to turn your heroes, they say,
into ambiguous ones whose motives are doubtful; we will make you reject the outmoded
and racist notion that there are such things as good and bad, life-affirming or
evil, heroes and villains.
England used to be merry. But now it’s Muslim. Islam frowns on
laughter, except when raping an infidel woman or child, or burying a knife into
a kafir. Only Allah may laugh, but
Muslims will never know it, because, like all mythological ghosts in the sky,
he never shows himself. He’s a wallflower.  That’s an Islamic
rule
. Laughing infidels deserve to be made to suffer or be killed. Kill them
as they dip into their cherry cobbler.

Fortunately, one has options. YouTube, Amazon, and other venues exist
in which  one can renew one’s emotional
need to see the heroic, to renew one’s emotional fuel to fight for one’s
values. That us what Rand called it: emotional
fuel
.

A sense of life is a
pre-conceptual equivalent of metaphysics, an emotional, subconsciously
integrated appraisal of man and of existence. … Art gives him that fuel;
the pleasure of contemplating the objectified reality of one’s own sense of
life is the pleasure of feeling what it would be like to live in one’s ideal world.
Values (and
value-judgments) are the source of emotions; a great deal of emotional
intensity was projected in the work of the Romanticists and in the reactions of
their audiences, as well as a great deal of color, …. Romantic art is the fuel
and the spark plug of a man’s soul; its task is to set a soul on fire and never
let it go out.
In our time, we must take what is there in the form of marginal or
twisted values. Hollywood and the publishing industry stopped producing values
decades ago, except in rare instances (e.g., Gladiator).
And then there are real life heroes and heroines, such as the women protestors
in Iran, one of whom burned the Koran and wrote that Islam
was imposed
on her country by Arabs.

New Year Started with a Bang: Revolt in Iran


An icon of Iran’s protests

The year 2018 started with a bang: mass protests in Iran and clashes
with the populace (mostly younger people) and the notorious Revolutionary
Guard, the enforcer of the mullahs’ will: Sharia. The Revolutionary
Guard
is a “paramilitary” army.
The Guard formed out
of Iran’s 1979 Islamic Revolution as a force meant to protect its
Shiite-cleric-overseen government and later [was] enshrined in its
constitution.
It operated parallel
to the country’s regular armed forces, growing in prominence and power during a
long and ruinous war with Iraq in the 1980s.
Though facing
possible disbandment after the war, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei
allowed it to thrive, granting it powers to expand into private enterprise. The
Guard answers only to Iran’s supreme leader.
 The Iranian regular
military, or Islamic Republic of Iran Army,
consist of the Islamic Republic of Iran
Army Ground Forces
, Islamic Republic of Iran Navy,[22]
Islamic Republic of Iran Air Force,
and the Islamic Republic of Iran Air
Defense Force
. The regular armed forces have an estimated 398,000
personnel: the Islamic Republic of Iran Army,
350,000 personnel, of which 220,000 are conscripts; the Islamic Republic of Iran Navy, 18,000
personnel, and the Islamic Republic of Iran Air Force,
30,000 airmen.[1]
The Islamic Republic of Iran Air
Defense Force
is a branch split off from the IRIAF.
The Army of the Guardians
of the Islamic Revolution
, or Revolutionary Guards, has an estimated
125,000 personnel in five branches: Its own Navy,[22]
Aerospace
Force
, and Ground
Forces
; and the Quds Force (special
forces
).
The protests and demonstrations continue, and possibly cause the
downfall of the “Revolutionary” government.
The larger protests,
which began on December 28 in Mashhad and have entered their seventh
consecutive day throughout Iran, have focused on a variety of issues, including
lack of food, high inflation, unemployment, and rejecting Iran’s costly wars in
foreign countries, which have resulted in sending weapons and fighters to Syria
and providing financial support to the Palestinians and Hamas and the Lebanese
Shiite militant group Hezbollah.
Chants of “Death to
the dictator!” referring to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and “Death
to Rouhani,” referring to Iran’s President Hassan Rouhani, have been repeated
for the past few days. Other chants include, “We
don’t want an Islamic republic,” and
 “Clerics shame on you, let go of our
country!”
This can’t help but come to a boil: the Revolutionary Guard and the
Iran army will crush the protests, or they will cave in. Some members of the Guard
and the army have let it be known they will not help punish the protestors;
this is a crack in the mullahs’ façade of omnipotence. We have had two
administrations that have helped the mullahs erect that sense of omnipotence,
Obama and Clinton.
Iran has planned and carried out dozens of acts of terror across five
continents. The regime currently provides financial and military support to
Hamas, Hezbollah, and Islamic Jihad, groups listed as Foreign Terrorist
Organizations (FTO) by the State Department and designated as terrorist
organizations by the European Union as well as several Arab nations. Iran
enabled Assad to perpetrate genocide against his own people, enabled Hezbollah
to swallow Lebanon whole, has spread misery in Yemen and provided deadly
Explosively Formed Projectiles (EFP) to Jihadists battling American troops in
Afghanistan and Iraq.
The EU designating Hamas, Hezbollah, and Islamic Jihad as terrorist
groups doesn’t really protect European citizens from them. The EU bureaucrats
are insulated from their hatred, and the devil takes the hindmost. They have
free reign to knife, run over, rape, toss fire bombs, and raise hell when they
will. There is no action being taken against them. They are like poisonous
mushrooms and they keep sprouting. We know these groups are there every time
more victims add to the pile of corpses they produce. They’re still in Europe
and their numbers are increasing as ISIS loses its steam and the U.S. and a few
others reduce their numbers, while all the others flee Iraq and make their way
to Europe through Turkey’s and President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’ s not-so-underground
railroad.
Brendan O’Neil, editor of
Spiked, yesterday asked:
Where is the world media?’,
asked Iranian-heritage actress Nazanin Boniadi this week as people across Iran
continued to confront the theocratic authorities. It’s a good question. Iran
has been rocked by brave, liberty-demanding revolts, and its Islamist rulers
have responded with severe, fatal repression, yet much of the Western media has
looked the other way. Liberal hacks in Britain have been too busy poring over
Toby Young’s tweets from eight years ago to think about Iranian women fighting
for the right to wear what they want and live as they please. Some media
outlets, including the HuffPost, have churned out protester-shaming
reports that could have been authored by the Ayatollah himself. We are now
seeing the extent of Western observers’ disdain for the idea of democracy in
this era of Brexit and Trump: they’ve become so convinced that politics is
better done by wise, expert cliques, rather than by grubby, ‘low-information’
little people, that they are unmoved, and probably a little horrified, by
ordinary Iranians’ democratic revolt against the theocrats and the Guardian Council
and the Assembly of Experts. Having demeaned democracy at home, they cannot
cheer it overseas.
All but a few MSM TV and print publications have either ignored the
protests or smeared them in various levels. “We don’t want to know about this. These
protestors are too much like the ‘freedom of speech’ protestors on campus. Besides
it isn’t important enough to pay attention to.” They choose not to acknowledge
that there are crucial radical differences: 
freedom of speech protestors in this country were harassed and penalized
by school and civil authorities, and attacked by Antifa thugs, who have the blessing of at least one U.S. congressman, Keith Ellison, a Muslim (shouldn’t he be wearing a Muslim night gown,  a beanie, and have an Arabic name, so we can
better identify his true colors?).

In the meantime, in the U.S., the new governor of Wisconsin has
revealed his Left narrative leanings by calling “The Star Spangled Banner” an “Ode
to Slavery” while Bosch Fawstin, had his Twitter account terminated by a wonk over “hate speech content.”
(It was reinstated after numerous protests and a threat by Fatwin to sue.)

The craziness isn’t limited to treasonous politicians.

 

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén