The Official Blog Of Edward Cline

Month: December 2018 Page 1 of 2

Lonve Wolves2

These “lone wolves” just obeyed Islam,
the ISIS flag is irrevalent

I opened my column, “Lone Wolves,” with:
Canadian Columnist Mark Steyn tackles a term, “lone wolf,” which describes not so much any jihadist as it does the authorities that fossick around a box of Islamic Crackerjacks in search of a motive, in strenuous evasion of the fact that the perps were Muslims  motivated by Islam .  
The authorities seem to be “lone wolves,” in their apparent divergence from the collection of facts about how Maren Ueland of Norway, and Louisa Jespersen of Denmark, were murdered.  One body was found inside the hiking tent they’d pitched, and the second outside of it. Photographs in several publications show investigators near the tent. But another picture claims that one was found near what looks like blockhouse (New Zealand Herald). Most reports say that the women’s throats had been cut and make no mention of their decapitation; were both women decapitated or just one?  How were their bodies mutilated? Was there evidence of the women being raped before being slain? There has been no mention of that in any of the accounts I’ve read. Did the woman have any contact with the killers before the killers struck? How many killers were there? No mention of that, either.  When do the medical examiners estimate the women were killed? Morning, noon, or night? 
A CBS report says:
Four men have been detained in Morocco, and authorities there consider the killings of two female students to be a terrorist act.  The women from Norway and Denmark had been hiking, and two French hikers discovered their bodies discovered Monday with stab wounds in their necks, [Holly] Williams reports. 
The term “Lone Wolves” is a piece of deceptive, distracting Politically Correct argot, almost synonymous with the term “extremist ” intended to change the focus of one’s attention from Islam to personal motives unrelated to Islam, so that one is led to the conclusion that the jihadist has “misunderstood” Islam or has psychological problems. There are a number of passages in the Koran and Hadith that the authorities can claim that a jihadist can “misunderstand” the  Koranic verses, such as:
“Kill the disbelievers wherever we find them” (2:191), “murder them and treat them harshly” (9:123), “fight and slay the Pagans, seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem.”
The holy Prophet prescribes fighting for us and tells us that “it is good for us even if we dislike it” (2:216). Then he advises us to “strike off the heads of the disbelievers (47:4).” Our God has promised to “instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers” and has ordered us to “smite above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them” (8:12).
The homicidal language cannot be “misunderstood.” It is clear and explicit. Jihadists take the “extreme” meaning” of the verses, which are the precise and intended meanings. It’s the difference between adding a teaspoon of salt to one’s boiling water and a ton.
So there seems to be a disparity in the reported coverage of the murders and what information has been released about the nature of the murders. We have entered an era when words lose their meanings, when things have definitions, but which PC allows people evade the things they want to avoid for fear of PC name-calling, such as “racist” or  “Islamophbia.”
Pamela Geller reported:
The SUN  Three Muslim men have been arrested after two female backpackers, 24-year-old Louisa Vesterager Jespersen, from Denmark, and Maren Ueland, 28, from Norway, were found with severe neck injuries in their tent at a popular trekking spot in Morocco.
According to Morocco World News, a witness, who asked to not to be named, said the women were allegedly found decapitated.” Their bodies were found in a “remote mountainous region” about 6.2 miles from the centre of the village.
A decapitation is a far cry from a mere “knife wound,” which would precede a  decapitation.
“The emir of the group” was Abdessamad Ejjoud, a 25-year-old street vendor living on the outskirts of Marrakech, according to the head of Morocco’s central office for judicial investigation, Abdelhak Khiam.
Ejjoud had “formed a kind of cell that discussed how to carry out a terrorist act inside the kingdom,” he told AFP.
Investigators claim Ejjoud is one of the four men seen pledging allegiance to Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi with a black IS flag in the background in a video uploaded by the group a week before the double murder.
Mr Khiam said the group “agreed under the influence of their emir to carry out a terrorist act … targeting the security services or foreign tourists”.
Two days before the murders, they travelled to the Imlil region “because it is frequented by foreigners” and “targeted the two tourists in a deserted area”, he said.  Described as “lone wolves”, the killers are said to have wanted to “carry out terrorist acts inside the kingdom” in revenge for Kurdish forces taking back control of ISIS-held towns in Syria.
Although the suspects had a photo taken of themselves with an ISIS flag in the background, Clare Lopez of the Center for Security Policy remarked:
When devout, practicing jihadis attack & kill non-Muslims, we are short-sighted to identify them only by a discrete group name – AQ, Islamic State, Taliban. We need to listen to what they themselves tell us: they fight jihad in obedience to Allah to establish a global Islamic State under rule of Islamic Law (shariah).
Islam has a definition that can’t be evaded. The suspects were motivated by Islam. It is a “religious” cult that prescribes death or submission for its non-believers,”or a living death for its believers. It is, basically, evil and anti-life.

Lone Wolves

Canadian Columnist Mark Steyn tackles a term, “lone wolf,” which describes not so much any jihadist as it does the authorities that fossick around a box of Islamic Crackerjacks in search of a motive, in strenuous evasion of the fact that the perps were Muslims  motivated by Islam .  

The suspects suffer from “mental illness,” their cranial instability probably the safest label they  can pin to a killer without being accused of not being “diversity’” friendly.

“This term ‘lone wolf’ is a cop-out…the idea that they somehow have to have a membership card in Islamic State or in al Qaeda for it to be official, fully-credentialed terror, like getting a hairdresser’s license in New York State is completely preposterous” he stated.
Steyn added that the rhetoric of “lone wolf” terrorists allows those who do not want to admit that radical Islam is a problem to brush off terror as isolated incidents, saying “all jihad is local. That actually suits them, to say, ‘oh no this is just some mentally ill guy in Ottawa and this is another guy who’s a bit goofy in New York and there’s no connection between the two.’ Because otherwise you have to treat it like your other big story. You have to treat it like ideological Ebola and you have to stop the infection…
In other words, the term “lone wolf” permits authorities to hopscotch over the reality of Islam-fueled terrorism, and thus avoid the hypothetical unpleasantness of offending Muslims or their “religion,” and probably the accusation of “racism” (even though the practice of Islam is not confined to any one race; but apparently this is a difficult concept to communicate).
Being a “lone wolf” entitles one to belong to the Amalgamated Union of Lone Wolves. One acts alone in one’s butchery, not on command by ISIS. One is inspired by ISIS, by its videos and online encouragement.
Relating to the beheading murders of Louisa Vesterager Jespersen, of Denmark, and Maren Ueland, of Norway in the High Atlas Mountains of Morocco, Australian News reported:
In a press conference in Rabat yesterday, police and domestic intelligence spokesman Boubker Sabik labelled the suspects “lone wolves”, adding that “the crime was not co-ordinated with Islamic State” [ISIS].
Authorities allege the four main suspects — all of whom were arrested within three days of the murders — recruited up to 15 others into a hastily formed terrorist group.
Authorities in Morocco and Denmark initially pinned the attack on Islamic State after a video of the four main suspects pledging allegiance to the group a week before the murders surfaced online.
But local police now believe the alleged killers acted without advance agreement with IS or any other foreign terrorist organization.
Although no connection to ISIS has been firmly established, ISIS wasted no time in cashing in on the murder, and celebrated them by sending videos of the beheadings Jesperson’s mother and her friends in Denmark. The Swedish government news outlet has made it a punishable offense to send the videos.
RT reports
On Christmas Eve, the national public broadcaster in Sweden aired a report about the barbaric killings, but chose not to focus on the actual details of the crime or the now-established links to Islamic terrorism. The SVT report made no mention of the fact that one of the young women was beheaded, said nothing about the ISIS link and simply referred to “knife damage” on the woman’s neck.
Bizarrely, the report focused almost entirely on how it is a punishable offence to share the disturbing video. Written reports on SVT’s website did mention the fact that the murders have been linked to Islamic terrorism, but that fact was nowhere to be found in its strange Christmas Eve report.
“Knife damage”?  That is about as sensational as me nicking myself while shaving. One commenter remarked in response to SVT’ timid, s soft shoe coverage of the crime:
225 years ago Marie Antoinette suffered ‘knife damage to her neck’ during the French Revolution,” another user sarcastically wrote.
Maximilien Robespierre held the knife. More than two centuries later,  Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi became his successor in terror. Robespierre was eventually consumed by his own army of lone wolves. Let us hope that al-Baghdadi meets the same just fate.
“This term ‘lone wolf’ is a cop-out…the idea that they somehow have to have a membership card in Islamic State or in al Qaeda for it to be official, fully-credentialed terror, like getting a hairdresser’s license in New York State is completely preposterous” he stated.
Steyn added that the rhetoric of “lone wolf” terrorists allows those who do not want to admit that radical Islam is a problem to brush off terror as isolated incidents, saying “all jihad is local. That actually suits them, to say, ‘oh no this is just some mentally ill guy in Ottawa and this is another guy who’s a bit goofy in New York and there’s no connection between the two.’ Because otherwise you have to treat it like your other big story. You have to treat it like ideological Ebola and you have to stop the infection…
In other words, the term “lone wolf” permits authorities to hopscotch over the reality of Islam-fueled terrorism, and thus avoid the hypothetical unpleasantness of offending Muslims or their “religion,” and probably the accusation of “racism” (even though the practice of Islam is not confined to any one race; but apparently this is a difficult concept to communicate).
Being a “lone wolf” entitles one to belong to the Amalgamated Union of Lone Wolves. One acts alone in one’s butchery, not on command by ISIS. One is inspired by ISIS, by its videos and online encouragement.
Relating to the beheading murders of Louisa Vesterager Jespersen, of Denmark, and Maren Ueland, of Norway in the High Atlas Mountains of Morocco, Australian News reported:
In a press conference in Rabat yesterday, police and domestic intelligence spokesman Boubker Sabik labelled the suspects “lone wolves”, adding that “the crime was not co-ordinated with Islamic State” [ISIS].
Authorities allege the four main suspects — all of whom were arrested within three days of the murders — recruited up to 15 others into a hastily formed terrorist group.
Authorities in Morocco and Denmark initially pinned the attack on Islamic State after a video of the four main suspects pledging allegiance to the group a week before the murders surfaced online.
But local police now believe the alleged killers acted without advance agreement with IS or any other foreign terrorist organization.
Although no connection to ISIS has been firmly established, ISIS wasted no time in cashing in on the murder, and celebrated them by sending videos of the beheadings Jesperson’s mother and her friends in Denmark. The Swedish government news outlet has made it a punishable offense to send the videos.
RT reports
On Christmas Eve, the national public broadcaster in Sweden aired a report about the barbaric killings, but chose not to focus on the actual details of the crime or the now-established links to Islamic terrorism. The SVT report made no mention of the fact that one of the young women was beheaded, said nothing about the ISIS link and simply referred to “knife damage” on the woman’s neck.
Bizarrely, the report focused almost entirely on how it is a punishable offence to share the disturbing video. Written reports on SVT’s website did mention the fact that the murders have been linked to Islamic terrorism, but that fact was nowhere to be found in its strange Christmas Eve report.
“Knife damage”?  That is about as sensational as me nicking myself while shaving. One commenter remarked in response to SVT’s timid, s soft shoe coverage of the crime:
225 years ago Marie Antoinette suffered ‘knife damage to her neck’ during the French Revolution,” another user sarcastically wrote.
Maximilien Robespierre held the knife. More than two centuries later,  Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi became his successor in terror as the head of ISIS. Robespierre was eventually consumed by his own army of lone wolves. Let us hope that al-Baghdadi meets the same just fate.

A Pair of Stooges

Ruth King wrote in her blogspot  Ruthfully Yours about the resignation of Secretary of Defense James Mattis,  and President Trump’s announcement to withdraw American troops from Syria:
I was advised by a good friend with whom I almost always agree, that I should include more columns criticizing the withdrawal of our troops from Syria. I did below. However, they only hardened my support for troop withdrawal.
First: Jewish “leaders” are opposed? As I recall they were not uniformly opposed to Obama’s disastrous and scurrilous appeasement of the mullahs in the infamous Iran deal.
Second: Israel is “nervous” that the removal of 2000 American soldiers will embolden Iran, Turkey and Syrian jihadists. Now, I am hawkish on Israel- very hawkish on a hawkish Israel with defense forces that do not rely-never- on any foreign guarantees for the security of the nation. Am I to believe that the presence of 2000 United States troops is necessary for Israel’s defense?
Sorry I remain unconvinced. And as for General Mattis- he was opposed to moving the United States embassy to Jerusalem; opposed to quashing the Iran deal; was opposed to the 2017 bombing of Syria in retaliation for Syrian chemical weapons attacks; opposed to leaving the G20 global climate fraud.
 Mattis and McMaster wanted Trump and the U.S. to bow to the global consensus.
It seems that James Mattis has been one of the Three Stooges against Trump’s foreign policy:  the two other “Stooges” have been George Soros and H.R. McMaster.  
McMaster became history in March, and for good reason. For example, The National Interest in February commented:
McMaster called for reforms to strengthen the very institutions that the president had previously decried as being hostile to American interests. “We must actively cooperate to protect, reform, and strengthen these institutions so that they honor their original aims—and serve the interests of states that value the rule of law and human dignity,” McMaster said.
McMaster also decried “revisionist” powers bent on undermining the liberal international order. “Revisionist powers are challenging the stability of the postwar international order through military force and other pernicious forms of aggression,” McMaster said.
His presence in the Trump administration was almost as bad a hiring a SJW to work in the White House. He wasn’t any better than, say, John Kerry.
Soros, of course, is not in the White House (thank God) and nor is he one of Trump’s close advisors counseling the President by telephone to compromise with our enemies. We all know what Soros stands for and pursues, which is suffocating Western civilization under the wet blanket of primitive, hostile Third World “cultures,” chiefly that of Islam.  
Ruth asks, “Am I to believe that the presence of 2000 United States troops is necessary for Israel’s defense?” No, she isn’t expected to believe that. 2000 American soldiers?  The technologically advanced Israeli Defense Forces numbers in the thousands and has repeatedly demonstrated its ability to fight Iran, Hezbollah, and other enemies of Israel, with fatal consequences for the enemy. So I agree that the withdrawal of 2000 soldiers, even if they’re largely staffed by Special Forces, is going to make much of a difference in a theater of war as bizarre and roiling as the Mideast. Those soldiers are there chiefly as adjuncts to the Kurds.
The Kurds are also capable of kicking Turkish and ISIS butt, as they have also demonstrated in the past. Especially effective are the female contingents of the Kurdish forces; to be killed by a female soldier in combat automatically robs a Muslim of his supposed ticket to paradise, so Turks and ISIS terrorists avoid engaging them.
The hair-tearing and desk-pounding of the Left over Trump’s decision is almost amusing but eloquently indicative of its apparently incurable TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome). “Oh, Gee, now the Iranians or the Turks will replace the Americans!” Since when did the Left care about what happens in Syria? Or in Iraq? Unless it was news of an American defeat or set-back?
What has the U.S. to gain by being in Syria, or in Afghanistan? Abundant supplies of figs, soap, or dish towels? Are we “nation building.” Creating a new partner in the war against terrorism? A new subsidized dependent, one that would require more billions of dollars and the lives of more Americans to protect from predators in the region?
Trump’s enemies claim that we’re handing Turkish dictator Recep Tayyip Erdoğan free rein to attack the Kurds once we’ve withdrawn our troops.
From my perspective, we’d be making a gift to Erdoğan of a stuffed pig gussied up with bright ribbons and a dash of lipstick.

News from the North

NEWS FROM CANADA

The divide is not between the Left and Right anymore but between patriots and globalists. Marine Le Pen
 — May 17 2017
~Dr. Gad Saad ~
The Global Compact
Europe is being destroyed by uncontrolled migration. There are refugees, fake refugees, economic migrants and terrorists, and no one can identify who is who.
Most are not looking to integrate into their host countries. They are colonists. Their aim is to overwhelm Western societies. Hundreds of sharia courts function in every major European city and there are numerous no-go zones, where infidels are forced out and police will not enter.
Jews are not safe in Europe and are leaving in record numbers, particularly from France, England, Norway and Sweden, where authorities cannot or will not protect them.
We must all be compassionate and ease the suffering of genuine refugees, but Canada would be foolish to follow Europe’s example.
U.S. Rightly Rejects UN Global Compact on Refugees
The United States has nothing to apologize for in standing up for its national sovereignty and opposing global compacts that do not serve the interests of the American people. As the Heritage Foundation concluded in urging the United States not to sign on to the Global Compact on Refugees, “Too often, even non-binding, voluntary compacts serve as gateways to binding commitments and vehicles for politically motivated criticism.” Moreover, if the leadership of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees continues to slam U.S. refugee policies and to press for international funding for Iran, the Trump administration should firmly object and cut back substantially on what the U.S. contributes annually to this UN bureaucracy.
BREAKING: “The people’s win” Belgian Prime Minister resigns over UN Migration Pact
Migrant criminality rising in countries where the number of migrants has also risen has given way to votes such as Brexit and the rise of populist politicians. The career ending UN Migration Compact has seen millions across the globe signing their names to petition after petition in at least half the member states demanding their governments not sign it.
Why You Should Be a Nationalist
 It’s undeniable: Around the world, nationalism is on the march, and the media and reigning political elites would have you believe this is a dangerous disaster in the making. So, why is Yoram Hazony, author of The Virtue of Nationalism, unafraid?
Canada
How Canada Protects Sharia Law
If you denounce Sharia law in a public fashion you will suffer. Outside of the Arab world, this also holds true in Canada, where a member of the Canadian Race Relations Foundation board, Christine Douglass-Williams, was fired over comments on Sharia law.
The Rise of the Violent Left
On June 19, 2013, Bill – 309 (41-1) was passed into law. An act to amend the Criminal Code Preventing Persons from Concealing Their Identity during Riots and Unlawful Assemblies
Concealment of identity:
(2) Every person who commits an offence under subsection (1) while wearing a mask or other disguise to conceal their identity without lawful excuse is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years.
 So, with this in mind, why does Canadian Law Enforcement consistently allow ANTIFA to cover their faces at protests and carry weapons?  Why are these violent ANTIFA protesters not being disbanded and put on the Listed Terrorist Entities List on the Government of Canada site.
Canada pays $8 million US to Taliban Soldier who Killed American
“What kind of sick and twisted ivory tower do you have to live in…to decide to award this man 10.5 million good-hearted, hard-working Canadian folks’ dollars?” Layne Morris, the Army veteran who lost eyesight in one eye due to a grenade thrown by Omar Khadr during a 2002 firefight, is blasting Trudeau and the Canadian government. https://www.facebook.com/FoxNews/videos/10155688170001336/UzpfSTE2MzMzMTMyMjE6MTAyMTYwNzEzODI4OTA2OTc/
Youth council member shows more courage than anyone in Trudeau’s pathetic government cabinet.
With her letter, Sara Wheale showed far more courage than any member of Justin Trudeau’s pathetic governing cabinet, none of whom showed the toughness or strength to condemn Trudeau’s awful remarks, or stand up for Canadian construction workers. When there’s more leadership in a youth council than in an entire federal government, you know that Canada has some serious problems at the top.
Canada released Somali Muslim “gangster refugee” who fled U.S. warrant, deportation order
 Retired Homeland Security agent Tony Langeland burst out laughing when he was read the statement about Farah being one of the most honest detainees the IRB officer had ever encountered. “I had a lot of interaction with him,” Langeland said. “He is definitely not the most honest person I have ever met. “But he is a criminal and he is involved in a whole lot of shit.”
Canada: Arabic newspaper publishes calls for Muslims to kill Jews
Canadian citizens have been lectured by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau that Canada is “tolerant” and that “diversity” is our strength. But what does the Prime Minister have to say about the gross anti-Semitism coming from Islamic supremacists inside Canada? A Canadian Arabic newspaper has recently published a hadith, accounts of sayings attributed directly to Muhammad, that speaks about Muslims killing Jews as part of the final Islamic fight to establish Sharia law and justice in the entire world.
Immigration “Its Trudeau’s way or we will monitor you”
 This is one hell of a clip. Its a commentary on one broadcast on Quebec TV yesterday (subtitled in English):
Watch all The Rebel’s Reports from the UN’s Global Warming Conference in Poland
Sheila Gunn Reid is covering the upcoming United Nations climate change conference in Katowice, Poland. It’s called COP 24, or the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, and it’s going to be just as uninformative and skeptical as it sounds.
Punches thrown during anti-immigration protest in Edmonton
There were only a few police officers present at Churchill Square when the altercation started, but more arrived after the first punch landed. About 20 officers formed a line to separate the pro and anti-immigration groups, comprising about 150 people in total.
Trudeau Economy: Exxon Mobil Scraps $25 BILLION LNG Project In B.C.
Canada’s increasingly-vulnerable economy has suffered another blow. Exxon Mobil has announced their withdrawal of the environmental assessment application they filed for a $25 billion liquid natural gas export facility in B.C. Another severe blow to Canada’s economy.
Open letter to Canadians opposing Canadian pipelines and oilsands
No one should get their facts from a nameless person shouting on the internet. So, my name is Demian Newman, and the two kids I’m leaving this planet to are Olivia and Liam. And both of them need to grow up in a country which is thriving as a world leader, both economically and environmentally – as anything less would be un-Canadian.
Act! For Canada:

Islam is Evil

Louisa Vesterager Jespersen, of Denmark left,
     and Maren Ueland, of Norway

This column is devoted to the evil of Islam.

The killing of non-Muslim humanitarian workers by devout followers of Islam occurs quite often. While there is rarely any celebration on the part of other Muslims, neither is there much outrage expressed by a community renowned for its peevishness.
While rumors of a Quran desecration or a Muhammad cartoon bring out deadly protests, riots, arson and effigy-burnings, the mass murder of non-Muslims fails to raise any sort of real passion. In the eleven years following 9/11 nearly 20,000 acts of deadly Islamic terrorism were perpetrated, yet all of them together do not provoke the sort of outrage on the part of most Muslims that the mere mention of Abu Ghraib or Guantanamo inspires.
In point of fact, the killing of any non-Muslims by Muslims is neither acknowledged, nor celebrated nor protested. The Ummah remains mute. The Koran permits and encourages such killing. The better to reduce the numbers of infidels and to make way for the Islamic “master race.”
The Koran says:
Qur’an 9:5 Fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, harass them, lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war.
Doubtless a so-called “civil rights” organization like CAIR (The Council on America n-Islamic Relations) would shed crocodile tears on the murders (the probable rape and beheadings of two Scandinavian hikers in the Atlas Mountains of Morocco), and continue on its campaign of “eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”  So says the Explanatory Memorandum. But CAIR and its useful, parroting idiots will say “This is not Islam.” CAIR or the MSN or the ICN or ISN would file a lawsuit asserting that “to oppose the construction of a mosque in your neighborhood, because a mosque would create traffic and congestion, is to oppose Islam” and claim “freedom of religion.”
Arabic symbol of the Koran
Why were these two women so vulnerable to the bestiality of these Muslims? Had they an inkling that they had been stalked? That they had been marked for torment and death? No.  Did they have a can of Mace or pepper spray ready? We don’t know yet. See the beheading video on Pamela Geller’s report here.
Danes and Norwegians, like other Scandinavians, are taught to be tolerant of Islam and to never question or doubt its “peacefulness.” They’re subjected to that brand of lobotomy from grade school and are consequently disarmed, so have no objective measure of Islam and what its adherents believe or are capable of. The rape statistics in Sweden are horrendous and the government there suppresses them so that people do not become anti-immigrant or anti-Islam. This is also the case in Germany and the U.K., where laws are in effect to punish citizens for speaking out against Islam, even though the rapes (e.g., Rotherham, etc) are committed largely by Muslims. It’s common knowledge, even to the police, who are not permitted by the state to think badly of Muslims, and who are more likely to arrest a non-Muslim for speaking ill publically or privately on the Internet about Islam.
The environment these women were raised in has sabotaged and scuttled their rationality and sense of self-preservation in hostile countries and even in their own countries. They’re taught to ignore the reality of Islam, even though the bestiality of the religion is almost daily reported in crime news. Islamophobia is the new thoughtcrime. The term, Islamophobia, was popularized by the Iranians and Muslim theorists. It is a form of George Orwell’s doublethink. “”Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.” (Nineteen Eighty-Four” Book 2, Chapter 3) That is, you must both fear Islam and Allah, and also not think of them as perilous or inimical but as your huggy-bear and glad hander and source of spiritual consolation (They’re not dangerous! proclaimed the signs of Europeans welcoming boatloads of immigrants into their countries ).
(Parenthetically, Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch searched for the origin of the term Islamophobia; “My conclusion was that it had originated in Britain and had almost certainly been coined not by a Muslim but a pitifully dhimmified Jew, the “anti-racism” campaigner Richard Stone. He was one of the authors of a letter to the Guardian in 1994, which was the first recorded use I could find of the term.)
Quran (4:24)“And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.” Allah even permitted Muhammad and his men to have sex with married slaves, such as those captured in battle.
It continues: And also forbidden to you are all married women (muhsanat) except those women whom your right hands have come to possess (as a result of war). This is Allah’s decree and it is binding upon you. But it is lawful for you to seek out all women except these, offering them your wealth and the protection of wedlock rather than using them for the unfettered satisfaction of lust. And in exchange of what you enjoy by marrying them pay their bridal-due as an obligation. But there is no blame on you if you mutually agree to alter the settlement after it has been made. Surely Allah is All-Knowing, All-Wise.
“Taken in war.” Fair game for Muslims
So,  Louisa Vesterager Jespersen, of Denmark, and Maren Ueland, of Norway, were “taken in war” against the infidels. They were likely gang-raped (there were at least three Muslims who attacked them) before having their throats cut, while one of them was beheaded. “Allah wills it,”  one of the men said on the video. “In the video, the perpetrators can be heard saying the murders were revenge for air strikes carried out by Western bombing missions in war-torn Syria.  “This is for Syria, here are the heads of your Gods,’ a man can be heard saying, as well as ‘this is in revenge for our brothers in Hajin.“
Horrific images showing one of the murdered Scandinavian tourists being beheaded in Morocco have been sent to a victim’s mother, it has emerged. 
ISIS fanatics gloated about the killing of Dane Louisa Vesterager Jespersen, 24, and Norwegian Maren Ueland, 28, by spreading the gruesome footage on social media.
The clip, in which a suspected ISIS terrorist shouts “Allah’s will,” was also sent to friends of Ms Jespersen via ‘private messenger’, it has been claimed.
Arabic symbol of Islam
Here is a selection of Koranic verses that should give you a taste of Allah’s “mercy.” Allah makes Negan, the super villain of The Walking Dead, look like a wussified amateur or a kindly parish priest.
4:89: “They wish that you should disbelieve as they disbelieve, and then you would be equal; therefore take not to yourselves friends of them, until they emigrate in the way of Allah; then, if they turn their backs, take them, and slay them wherever you find them; take not to yourselves any one of them as friend or helper.”
5:33: “This is the recompense of those who fight against Allah and His Messenger, and hasten about the earth, to do corruption there: they shall be slaughtered, or crucified, or their hands and feet shall alternately be struck off; or they shall be banished from the land. That is a degradation for them in this world; and in the world to come awaits them a mighty chastisement.”
5:38: “And the thief, male and female: cut off the hands of both, as a recompense for what they have earned, and a punishment exemplary from Allah; Allah is All-mighty, All-wise.”
8:12: “When thy Lord was revealing to the angels, ‘I am with you; so confirm the believers. I shall cast into the unbelievers’ hearts terror; so smite above the necks, and smite every finger of them!’”
8:39: “Fight them, till there is no persecution and the religion is Allah’s entirely; then if they give over, surely Allah sees the things they do.”
8:60: “Make ready for them whatever force and strings of horses you can, to terrify thereby the enemy of Allah and your enemy, and others besides them that you know not; Allah knows them. And whatsoever you expend in the way of Allah shall be repaid you in full; you will not be wronged.”
 9:5: “Then, when the sacred months are drawn away, slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them, and confine them, and lie in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they repent, and perform the prayer, and pay the alms, then let them go their way; Allah is All-forgiving, All-compassionate.”

No critique of Islam would be complete without mentioning its quest to impose Sharia on all people, regardless of or in opposition to one’s religion, FMG (female genital mutilation), honor killing, and misogyny. Islam seeks to make life as miserable as possible by force or by deception.
Beware of the dog. The illiterate, psychopathic Mohammad is quite verbose, as most super villains are.

Globalist Big Brothers

We are left wondering what profound motive it was that the “Des Gilets Jaunes” (the Yellow Vests) were moved to raise destructive hell in France the past few weeks. Was it just a protest against the new price of diesel gas? No. It was also a protest against taxes. And it was also a protest against Emmanuel Macron’s policies. One of which might have been his gratuitous immigration policy. It’s hard to decide what caused thousands of Frenchmen to run riot. There have been over a dozen explanations for the turmoil. Business Insider had one summary explanation:

The Yellow Vests mobilized over rising gas prices mainly caused by a new tax on diesel fuel which has jacked up prices 16% in 2018.
Diesel went from an average €1.24 ($1.41) per litre to €1.48 ($1.69,) according to UFIP, France’s oil industry federation, cited by CNN.
Macron’s government said this is to be more environmental and to go green, but in rural areas which don’t have public transport or car sharing services, driving is the main option. Macron said these taxes are necessary to help make the country a low-emission economy.
President Emmanuel Macron’s leadership is central to this anger and they say he and his government don’t care about ordinary people.
Here is another clarification of the anger against the new diesel gas prices, from Americans In France:
In France 70%+ of cars run on diesel (gazole). Why is this? In short the tax on diesel is less than on gasoline (essence). In the price of a liter of diesel about 55% goes to taxes. In gasoline it’s about 65%. It’s largely this difference in taxes that explains why the French drive diesel powered cars. [And also because they’re used cars] The specific taxes is the TIPP – Taxe Intérieure de consommation sur les Produits Pétroliers. The TIPP for diesel is €.42 per liter and for gasoline it’s €.59 per liter.
Because diesel is cheaper than gasoline, cars running on diesel tend to be driven more and therefore need more maintenance. Diesel motors are noisier and emit more fine particles into the air.
Macon’s not-so-secret motive behind the rise in diesel gas prices was to compel people to become “greener” and more environmentally “conscious.” They must be forced to be model environmentalists, through their pocket books, if necessary.
As we now know, that “high-minded” tax, imposed from on high on the homme ordinaire, and later withdrawn lest it bring the water to the boiling point, was an elitist’s action to twist Frenchmen into becoming “low emission” slaves. 
Victor Davis Hanson has a broad explanation about the French uprising that cuts to the chase of why Frenchmen do what they do. In American Greatness, on December 16, in his article, “The Globalist Mindset: They Hate You,” he wrote:
Against what or whom is the contemporary Western public pushing back?
The French non-Parisians against new green taxes on already unaffordable gasoline?
Broke southern European Union nations against the financial demands of German bankers?
The Eastern Europeans against French and German open-border mandates?
The British masses against both the EU and their own government that either cannot or will not follow the will of the people and implement Brexit?
The American populists against outsourcing, offshoring, and illegal immigration?
The common target of all these populist pushbacks is an administrative and cultural elite that shares a set of transnational and globalist values and harbors mostly contempt for the majority of their own Neanderthal citizens who are deemed hopelessly unwoken to environmental, racial, gender, and cultural inevitabilities.
In a word, the Ivy League, Oxbridge, and the Sorbonne masters, of the universe, assume that the world is on a predetermined trajectory. We are to follow an arc of history bending toward state-managed social justice if you will—to end up as a sort of global Menlo Park, Malibu, Upper West Side, Saint-Germain-des-Prés, Schwabing, or Kensington. No wonder, it is their ethical duty of transnationals to goad the fated, but sometimes stalled, process along.
America has its own coterie of transnationals or globalists:
The globalist elite is certainly transnational and is sickened by localism, traditionalism, and autonomy. Monsieur Macron shares much more in common with Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, or Justin Trudeau than he does with rural Frenchmen. It is almost as if in 2019 our elites are emulating the interlocking aristocratic families of late 19th-century Europe, but instead of being common descendants of Queen Victoria they are the godchildren of Menlo Park, Brussels, Strasburg, Davos, and Wall Street.
And they wish to perpetuate their transnational club of privilege and power.
Globalism is both an ideology and a culture of behavior. The creed is that the Western world, given its colonial and imperialist past, has a duty both to make amends to the former third world through magnanimously lending the global community elite Western expertise—whether through Kyoto- or Paris-like climate accords, foreign interventions guided by Western humanitarian principles, asymmetrical trade agreements, open borders, or U.N. mandates.
Hanson touches on what is a delicate point that goes far to explain the globalists’ urge to combat nationalism and sovereignty: the alleged guilt of Western countries for their colonial and “imperialist” pasts. They seek to force nations to “atone” for such histories by abolishing national borders and subjecting indigenous populations to the primitive and savage “cultures” invited and permitted to invade countries. 
He writes:
Globalist penance for past sins is accomplished in a variety of ways. Non-Westerns are not to be held to symmetrical value systems. Islamic countries can destroy churches, Western nations consider mosques sacrosanct. Illegal immigration force feeds diversity onto a tired and exhausted Western public in dire need of having its horizons expanded by the other. Dumping, patent and copyright theft, and technological appropriation are sins only for wayward Westerners.
Bruce Thorton and Niram Ferretti published an interesting discussion on the origins and consequences of this Westerrn “guilt” in their article, “The Muslim Immigrant: The Icon of Oppressed Humanity” in an Italian magazine, Foglio Quotidiano.  
Ferretti: Professor Thornton, in 1984, French philosopher Pascal Bruckner wrote Le sanglot de l’homme blanc, his essay in which he showed how the West, from the Sixties onwards, has been engulfed in an apotheosis of self-guilt. The bottom line is that Western civilization is nothing more than a tale full of sound and fury, while the Third World is the innocent victim of its rapacity and evil.  What are the reasons, according to you, of this cultural landscape?
Thornton: There are three developments behind what we can call Third Worldism.  First, increasing contact with the undeveloped world through colonialism exposed Europeans to exotic peoples whom they idealized as superior to their own more developed and repressed lives. Next, Marxism, having been rejected by the European proletariat, turned to the anticolonial revolutionary movements in the Third World to find a substitute revolutionary vanguard. Now the revolution would be spearheaded by Third World peoples rather than the workers. And it made the Third World into a useful club for attacking liberal democratic and capitalist countries. Finally, Romanticism and the cult of sentimentalism in the West, aided by globalized communication media, found the Third World an object of “compassion” and guilt, which mass media turned into a commodity of suffering that Westerners could consume and vicariously enjoy those feelings without any efforts to ameliorate it. The result is cheap sentiment and guilt serving the Marxist ideology of undermining Western culture.
Thornton: We have institutionalized Lenin’s slogan “Who, whom” ––who is the oppressor, who is the victim. This dynamic underlies political correctness, multiculturalism, and identity politics, all of which work to leverage political power from a group’s status as an historically oppressed victim. The battle is lost, for now. These assumptions and attitudes have shaped three generations, and become mental reflexes beyond critical examination. We see it, e.g., in the Republican Party establishment, which alienated the voters who put Donald Trump in office by Republicans’ bad habit of accepting the progressive views on race, sex, homosexuality, etc…..
Ferretti: Recently French philosopher Alain Finkielkraut, stated that, “Anti-racism is the Communism of the XXI century, do you agree?
Thornton: Absolutely. Marxism has always been a melodrama pitting absolute good against absolute evil. Identity politics, which is predicated on grievances responding to historical crimes, had to inflate racism into the arch crime even though historical change has reduced to a fringe the legal infrastructure of segregation and the brutal violence and petty daily humiliation with which most blacks lived in America before the Sixties. Anti-racism fosters resentment and grievance that provide energy for political action and political leverage for extracting power from the government. So it must be melodramatic: no complexity or nuance, just pure evil continuing to brutalized the noble, righteous oppressed––the anti-racist. Finally, as do Marxists, the nobility and righteousness of the anti-racist justify “any means necessary,” including censorship, assaults on rights like free speech, and violence.
What the globalists want to erase
Back to Victor Hanson’s essay:
Globalism ultimately is an offspring of elite progressive universities, think tanks, foundations, government institutions, and borderless corporatism. All the old progressive boilerplate—anti-trust legislation, prohibitions on monopolies, product liability—ceases when vast multibillion-dollar tech fortunes put their money into progressive causes, and thereby remind us that sometimes noble ends justify unethical means of obtaining them.

Facebook, Google, and Twitter have a perfect right to monopolize, to warp political expression, and to censor free speech if they devote their billions to enacting global climate, political, or social justice change, in the manner that here at home the Justice Department, the FBI, the CIA, and NSA—at times in conjunction with their foreign counterparts—justifiably had to monitor, use informants, and spread libelous smears on reckless Cro-Magnons like Donald J. Trump, who would harken us back to an embarrassing nationalist and sovereign past. Illegality has its uses.

So, there you are absorbing all the information about the poisonous saturation of Western civilization by globalism, when you encounter a headline such as this one:

UCLA Professor: Too Many White Male Firefighters Out There.” It’s a globalist complaint, of course, and it goes on to whine about there not being enough gays, transgenders, and Muslims asked to risk their lives putting out raging forest fires. Its’a patriarchy that favors white men. The patriarchy must be eliminated for world social justice.

 

Genocide in South Africa

Andile Mngxitama calls for mass murder

The MSM does not deign to report an ounce of news about the South African government deciding, by constitutional amendment, to steal all white-owned farmland.  This is chiefly at the prompting and urging of the Parliament’s communist/racist Julius Malema. He is not only a communist, but a combination Leninist and Stalinist; Lenin imposed communism on Russia; Stalin decided to seize the most productive farmland, which was in the Ukraine, and as a consequence starved millions to death when the collectivization of agriculture failed. Malema is a member of the African National Congress (ANC) and heads the Economic Freedom Fighters  (which means it fights against freedom, not for it)

Cyril Ramaphosa is the president of the country and is as much a racist as Malema.
Katy Hopkins and Lauren Southern have excellent, informative videos about the economic situation in South Africa and the atmosphere of fear among white farmers can be found here and here. Stalin’s starvation of millions was deliberate and premeditated. The same thing will happen when the farmers are eradicated; the whole population will starve. It is estimated that one farmer feeds about 3,000 people. Additionally, the country has a water problem; Israel offered its technology to help correct the problem, but Ramaphosa rejected the offer, based on Israel’s relation with the Palestinians. This is spiting one’s nose for ideological  and racial reasons, and not really concerned about the population.  
The lie about how whites “stole” the land from the blacks is fiction out of whole cloth. Southern presents a history of South Africa that contradicts the common story and belief propagated by the government, that whites systemically robbed blacks of their land. The Dutch began to settle the Cape Town area in the late 17th century. They got along with two black tribes which were eventually wiped out by the Bantu from the north, The Khoikhoi (previously called Hottentots) and the San. A detailed description of the chief and final battle between the Voortrekkers and the Zulus can be found here. As Southern and Hopkins relate, the white settlers entered into land trades and agreements with blacks but never expropriated it. The farms that Ramaphosa and Melama want to take originated with the whites, and were created and maintained by them…for centuries.
The story of blacks once owning hundreds of farms “stolen” by whites is as much a myth of Wakanda one, two and three.
Hopkins and Southern both traveled to South Africa and collected volumes of information about conditions in South Africa as well as gruesome stories in many points in the country of how whites have been targeted by the government and the police for terrorism, and not just the farmers. Black farmers and their workers are also terrorized. The South African government is not only corrupt, but it is a terrorist government.
Kat y Hopkns tweeted, quoting from :
“For every 1 black person we kill 5 white people”

President of Black First Land First Andile Mngxitama calls for killing of whites

Tells cheering crowd: ‘we kill their children, we kill their women, we kill their dogs.

Watch and listen to creature’s blood lust

And they do. The world watches on, silent
Listen to this evil person, President of Black First Land First, Andile Mngxitama, ranting how  all whites should be killed.
Peter D’Abrosca reports that Hopkins remarks:
The mainstream press is once again silent after the president of a socialist South African political party called for the deaths of white people.
“You kill one of us, we kill five white people,” shouted Andile Mngxitama at a Saturday rally where he called for revolution. “We kill their children, we kill their women, we kill their dogs, we kill their cats, we kill anything we find in our way.”
Mngxitama is the president of South Africa’s socialist Black First Land First Party (BFL).
The clip has been pulled from YouTube for violating the company’s terms of service, but British commentator KT Hopkins posted the clip to her Twitter account:
During the clip, Mngxitama also called for 50,000 “soldiers” to sign up and “join the “revolution.”
After facing intense public backlash, BFL and Mngxitama were forced to walk back the statement. According to Lindsay Maasdorp, spokesperson for the BFL, Mngxitama was talking about killing whites in self-defense.
In August, members of South Africa’s radical left Economic Freedom Fighter party were filmed chanting “white men must die.”
  Mngxitama’s is another in a series of calls for the deaths of white people in South Africa, which is on the brink of a civil war, that has gone unreported by Western press. In fact, the media has clutched its pearls, claiming that calls for the genocide of whites in South Africa are a white supremacist dog-whistle perpetuated by President Donald J. Trump.
Big League Politics reported:
The mainstream press melted down and devolved into calling President Donald J. Trump a white supremacist after he Tweeted a factual statement about land being seized from white farmers in South Africa.
“I have asked Secretary of State [Mike Pompeo] to closely study the South Africa   land and farm seizures and expropriations and the large scale killing of farmers. ‘South African Government is now seizing land from white farmers,’” he said on Twitter.

Blaspheming Islam

It’s so easy to blaspheme Islam.

Allah as a clown

It’s as easy as laughing at the irony of a Muslim clown entertaining at a children’s party.
A Muslim clown? Is there such a thing? A Muslim comedian is not necessarily a clown, threatening the kids with eternal hellfire if they can’t remember how to recite the shadada.
Actually, there is a whole Wikipedia entry on Islamic humor. Reviewing some of the humor in the Koran and Hadith, it wasn’t of Jerry Seinfeld caliber, or even of Archie Bunker’s. Mohammad would bomb at the Comedy Club. His first set would be the last. Perhaps the kids might chuckle when the clown bangs his head so hard it hurts (which would instantly earn him a Fatwa; after all one is not supposed to feel pain when expressing obedience to Allah). There are a couple dozen standup comedians who…
…use comedy to educate people about Islam, invite people towards Islam, and encourage good actions….

Bruce Bawer has an article, “Improving Muslim Integration: Sending in the Clowns,”

 on the elaborate Swedish effort and expense to bring enlightenment to Muslim kids, especially, in countries torn by  religious sectarianism.  
Nonetheless, the Swedish Migration Board has managed to find an unspecified number of kronor – apparently in the millions – to spend on the services of an organization called Clowner utan Gränser. Translation: Clowns without Borders (hereafter CWB). According to an article in the invaluable Friatider website, CWB plans to “’play’ its way to better integration.”
The Migration Board specifies that the clowns will be used to integrate non-EU immigrants – which in Sweden, of course, mostly means Muslims.
After reading Friatider’s story, I naturally went straight to CWB’s website. Front and center is detailed information about how to contribute money to this thing: “Become a donor and spread laughter every month!”
Click on “about us” and you’ll find out that CWB was founded in 1996 and operates in a dozen countries, sending clowns into refugee camps and youth prisons. CWB’s declared mission is “to meet children in pleasure, play, and joy.” It seeks to create “hope, humanity, and the will to live.” Its vision is “a world filled with play, laughter, and dreams, where all people have the opportunity to develop, express themselves freely, and feel hope even in vulnerable situations.” All its work “is done in our belief that it creates a better world.”
What? No virgins? Just dates? Are you joking?
A “better world”? One in which a happy Muslim rapes, stabs, throws acid into someone’s face, or commits vehicular jihad with a smile on his face?  Is a jihadi all “play, laugher, and dreams”? Bawer remarks later in his July 2017 article:
…But the main point here, obviously, is that the eagerness of the Swedish Migration Board to bring “play, laughter, and dreams” to Muslim children makes one thing perfectly clear: namely, that – even after all these years, all these immigrants, and all these failed efforts at integration – Swedish authorities still don’t know the first damned thing about Islam. Have none of them ever come across the Ayatollah Khomeini’s famous pronouncement on the subject of play and laughter?
“Allah,” declared Khomeini, “did not create man so that he could have fun. The aim of creation was for mankind to be put to the test through hardship and prayer. An Islamic regime must be serious in every field. There are no jokes in Islam. There is no humor in Islam. There is no fun in Islam. There can be no fun and joy in whatever is serious.”
Of course, the Sh’ite Iranian mullahs are certifiably humorless. We can see that in virtually every photograph of a knee-slapping mullah. But the Sunni sheiks of Saudi Arabia probably snickered up their sleeves when Barack Obama bowed to kiss the hand of the King of the country in 2009.

The pure evil of Islam, however, is no laughing matter. It has slaughtered more people over the centuries than Hitler and Stalin put together.

Comey’s Alzheimer’s Episode

I cannot tell a lie. But I can say nothng.

Inconvenient memory lapses. A bother.

 

One rarely, if ever,  witnesses a person burdened by advanced Alzheimer’s, that is, the near total blanking out in one’s memory of what one has done or not done. It’s much like such a person forgetting how to tie his shoe laces or forgetting where or how one must drive a car. This is usually a privately revealed malady not usually broadcast to the public.

 

 In this case, however, is James Comey testifying. In Comey’s case it is a deliberate blanking out.  245 times claim members of the House Judiciary Committee who questioned Comey. He “can’t remember” or he doesn’t  “recall”  things he did or did not do when he headed the FBI  (shall we call it the FIB?).This is an individual who once headed the FBI, and, after accusing Hillary Clinton of being “careless” with her private email server, then deciding that her “lack of intention” in such carelessness was not a prosecutable offense.

 

  James Comey:  “No serious person” would attempt to prosecute Hillary Clinton.”
He didn’t even attempt to. So I guess Comey is not a serious person.
However, from the horse’s mouth. Neon Nettle reports:
Comey spoke for more than an hour and repeatedly attacked the sitting president on a number of fronts, even comparing the Trump administration to the mafia families and crime syndicates he’d prosecuted in the past. He also accused the president of engaging in “witness tampering” via his use of Twitter and suggested that Mueller was “close” to naming Trump as an “unindicted co-conspirator” in the alleged crimes purportedly committed by some of his associates.
It is worth noting, however, that Comey seemed to withhold his support of the general push from the left to impeach President Trump. Comey described “Trumpism” as a sort of political ill infecting the country, one that needed to be excised “in a landslide rid ourselves of this attack on our values.”
Comey added, “Removal by impeachment would muddy that,” and insinuated that roughly a third of the country — presumably in reference to the solid base of loyal support maintained among the populace by Trump, which has never dipped below the mid thirties percentage-wise — would view removal by impeachment as a veritable “coup” against the duly elected leader.
Here the “unbiased”  former director says, per Western Journalism:
Speaking at an event in New York City with MSNBC host Nicole Wallace, a former Bush White House official turned vehemently NeverTrump “Republican,” Comey said, “All of us should use every breath we have to make sure the lies stop on January 20, 2021.”
He further urged the disparate ideological wings of the Democratic Party — progressive leftists versus establishment moderates — to set aside any differences they had and unite together behind a concerted effort to defeat Trump at the polls in 2020. Comey said, “I understand the Democrats have important debates now over who their candidate should be, but they have to win. They have to win.” [Italics mine]
Who must win? Can he remember? The Republicans? The Russians? The Martians? The Democrats? Oh, yeah. Them.  My pals, the Dems.

A Compact of Tyranny

For those who wish to nod off reading it – warning: it is in verbose, generalized, non-specific UN-ese – here is the text of the Global Compact.

In the Grip of the Global Compact

The so-called Principles of the Compact can be read in part here:
The pact is not legally binding but can provide very useful guidance for countries facing migration, she told a news conference.
“Many challenges will stand in the way of its implementation, not least the toxic and ill-informed narrative that too often persists when it comes to migrants…”
While the GCM is ostensibly “non-binding,” active signatories will be able to take slackers and non-signatories to the political woodshed. Signatories include companies as well as states. There are 12,000+ signatories in over 160 countries, both developed and developing, representing nearly every sector and size.
World Watch reported on December 10th:
              
In early October, the United Nations “de-listed” 335 companies from the UN Global Compact, a voluntary business initiative that brings together companies in support of universal environmental and social principles. The signatories’ removal from the list of participants indicates their failure to submit the required “Communication on Progress” (COP), an annual summary of actions taken toward meeting the Compact’s goals that is shared publicly with stakeholders and used to “safeguard the integrity of the initiative.” Any company that does not submit a COP for two consecutive years is labeled as “inactive” on the UN Global Compact website.
Among the companies listed as inactive as of early November were Air India, China Petroleum and Chemical Corporation, Ernst & Young-Brazil, Moscow City Telephone Network, and NH Hotels of Spain. An inactive label does not necessarily mean that a company is not implementing the Compact’s 10 principles in the areas of human rights, labor, the environment, and anti-corruption. However, being an active participant indicates the company’s commitment to the initiative and offers derivative benefits such as the ability to use the Global Compact name and logo. Participating companies may also see improved access to markets and capital, proactive risk management, reputational gains, improved stakeholder relations, and better employee morale and retention.
By de-listing companies, the Global Compact is demonstrating its credibility and interest in upholding its standards of corporate responsibility, says Sir Mark Moody-Stuart, chair of the Foundation for the Global Compact. “While the Global Compact is a purely voluntary initiative, it is important to protect the investment that seriously committed companies and other stakeholders have made,” he notes. “It is crucial that companies take seriously their commitment and demonstrate performance.” To regain their “active” status, de-listed companies are simply required to submit the missing COP.
UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, who conceived the Global Compact in 1999 as a way to make global markets more sustainable and inclusive, endorsed the de-listing process, asserting that “success is only possible when business can operate in ways that benefit economies, societies, and people everywhere.” Annan challenged the business and academic communities to “sustain the momentum of the corporate responsibility movement” through responsible practices and universal principles. Since its official launch in July 2000, the Global Compact has grown to some 3,000 participants, including more than 2,500 businesses in 90 countries worldwide.
The U.S. pulled out of the Paris Agreement, and has eschewed any and all climate change agreements or compacts, as “hot air.” and so will not participate in the Marrakesh party.   
Wikipedia notes:
The Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration (GCM) is a intergovernmentally negotiated agreement, prepared under the auspices of the United Nations, that covers “all dimensions of international migration in a holistic and comprehensive manner”.
At the Intergovermental Conference to Adopt the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, which was held from 10–11 December 2018, 164 nations met under the auspices of the United Nations General Assembly at Marrakesh, Morocco, in order to formally agree upon the Compact.  As the Compact is not an international treaty, and it will be non-binding under international law. However, as with similar United Nations agreements, it will formally be a politically binding commitment.
To sign the “GCM” is to agree to censor any and all criticism of the invading “cultures.”  Criticism would of course include especially anything that “defames” or tells the truth about Islam.  It is understood that the GCM is about “migrating” to advanced Western nations, and especially those that are welfare states. “Objective” 9 stresses that migrants be guaranteed welfare benefits:
…ensure migrants have access to public or affordable independent legal assistance and representation in legal proceedings that affect them, including during any related judicial or administrative hearing, in order to safeguard that all migrants, everywhere, are recognized as persons before the law and that the delivery of justice is impartial and non-discriminatory….
  
And that such benefits are “portable” or transferrable from country to country. “Objective” 22 states:
…integrate provisions on the portability of entitlements and earned benefits into national social security frameworks, designate focal points in countries of origin, transit and destination that facilitate portability requests from migrants, address the difficulties women and older persons can face in accessing social protection, and establish dedicated instruments, such as migrant welfare funds in countries of origin that support migrant workers and their families….
As for the criticism of GCM and migrants, that is to be discouraged. “Objective” 16 states:
…promote mutual respect for the cultures, traditions and customs of communities of destination and of migrants by exchanging and implementing best practices on integration policies, programmes and activities, including on ways to promote acceptance of diversity and facilitate social cohesion and inclusion …
Migrants must be “protected” from any and all forms of racism, xenophobia, and other negative hostility, which means criticisms of the migrants’ cultures and practices. “Objective” 17 states:
We commit to eliminate all forms of discrimination, condemn and counter expressions, acts and manifestations of racism, racial discrimination, violence, xenophobia and related intolerance against all migrants in conformity with international human rights law. We further commit to promote an open and evidence-based public discourse on migration and migrants in partnership with all parts of society, that generates a more realistic, humane and constructive perception in this regard. We also commit to protect freedom of expression in accordance with international law, recognizing that an open and free debate contributes to a comprehensive understanding of all aspects of migration.
Furthermore, signatories must:
…enact, implement or maintain legislation that penalizes hate crimes and aggravated hate crimes targeting migrants, and train law enforcement and other public officials to identify, prevent and respond to such crimes and other acts of violence that target migrants, as well as to provide medical, legal and psychosocial assistance for victims….
For example, Justin Trudeau has promised to subsidize the Canadian press to not say anything bad about the Compact or about the migrants: the Toronto Sun last month reported:
It calls upon governments to “promote independent, objective and quality reporting… and stopping allocation of public funding or material support to media outlets that systematically promote intolerance, xenophobia, racism and other forms of discrimination towards migrants.”
So much for a free press.
The UN wants governments to actively intervene in the media and pick and choose which journalists are worthy of promoting, based on a radical ideology and far-left worldview.
In short, you will be reported to the Thought Police, if you’ve not already been identified as a dissenter or an “Islamophobe” and taken to Room 101.
The UN is the “one world government” the Left has dismissed as a “conspiracy theory.”

Page 1 of 2

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén