The Official Blog Of Edward Cline

Month: March 2019

The Dems are our Whisperers

Evil is the leitmotif of today’s culture, in politics and in the arts. It’s an analogy that bedevils my thinking.
 The Democrats remind me of the Whisperers, the latest villains in The Walking Dead TV series, who have rejected civilized life to live in nature (‘as nature intended,’ remarked Alpha), subsisting on worms and grubs. They are determined to erase what is left of civilization, and to punish the living who work to live, by killing the living.  Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Rashida Tliab, and IIlhan Omor are the “living” zombies or walkers, together with their MSM boosters, amongst us. They are the minor “Alphas” who command the herds of the dead. They are the shock troops of the Whisperers. By wearing walker  (zombie) masks, they pretend to be walkers, but are armed with knives and will kill.
The previous super villain, Negan, led a group of looters who raided productive communities of survivors, or held their existence for ransom with the threat of extinction if they did not submit.  Negan killed at the drop of a hat. He was a psychopathic and verbose killer. The difference between Negan and the Whisperers is that at least Negan valued the material comfort he wrested from his victims. Alpha and her Whisperers, far on the other hand, are nihilists to the core. They eschew all civilized comforts, and kill and destroy for the sake of effecting negation. Civilized life and values are a joke, says Alpha.
As a story device, the Whisperers are literally incredible. In reality, no one could live for long the way it is depicted how they live from day to day “in nature.” Disease, malnutrition, constant exposure to rain and snow, and a host of parasites would weaken their bodies and ultimately kill them – aside from their cult-driven mental problems – and cause a growing attrition in the human numbers of the Whisperer tribe. Alpha and her second in command, Beta, appear to be the only relatively “healthy” members. Beta is six-foot brute and the “enforcer” of the tribe. He does as Alpha wishes, and kills on  cue.
 Alpha committed her first murder in Baltimore when she was hiding with her family in a basement at the beginning of the zombie apocalypse. She killed her husband when he began to go stir-crazy. She nearly murdered her daughter when the girl began to suffocate from a plastic wrap. In the beginning of the latest episode, she calmly scalps a comely woman she has killed, humming, and uses the hair in a disguise herself, by wearing the scalped hair over her shaven head, to infiltrate a community’s fair, aside from donning the woman’s dress and hat. Her face is blemished with dark spots; she is not an advertisement for living in a raw environment. She shaved her mind of all rational values, just as she shaved her head. See the illustration above of her holding a Whisperer mask.
 The other Dems comprise a herd of “walkers” and stalk humans (wearing  skinned walker masks) led by:   Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez , Ilhan Omar, and  Rashida Tlaib). Nancy Pelosi is the chief Alpha of the story. As a death-worshipping cult, the Whisperers, much like Islam, nurture a festering and implacable malice and hatred for anything that evokes the “old” world and despise anyone who attempts to recreate it. The Dems work to erase a society based on reason.
 I have watched this series from its debut in 2010 to the present to see how it would eventually mirror our crooked and corrupt culture. I’m certainly not a fan of any kind of horror film, but I watched this series because it featured men and women dealing with “emergency” situations.  
The TWD series is pocked with gaping plot holes, marred with gaps of causo- connections in action and dialogue. Often the story continuity falters.
 “May my mercy prevail over my wrath.”This is first said by Siddiq in Episode “Mercy” when Carl, the group’s leader, comes across Siddiq (nominally a Muslim) hiding in an abandoned gas station.  Rick repeats it later in the series in one of his hallucinating or dream segments. The homily was likely invented by the writers and producers of the series, because it does not occur in the Koran. This is according to Robert Spencer, an authority on jihad; neither of us could find a statement in the Koran that remotely reflects the Mohammadan homily. Spencer suggested Koran passage at 32:13, but we both came up zilch.

32:13: And if we had willed, We could have given every soul its guidance, but the word from Me will come into effect [that] I will surely fill Hell with jinn and people all together.

Lots of wrath, but no mercy.
In my Rule of Reason column, in answer to a reader’s question whether or not Muslims will be visible among the herds of “walkers.  From Season 8:
“No, it won’t be allowed. There were no Muslim walkers or zombies in any episode, just herds of mostly white ones, with a sprinkling of blacks and Asians. No Muslimas in hijabs, abayas, or burkas,  nor Muslim men wearing kufis or caps, attacking the living, as they do in real life. The villains were all white, including the cannibals who ran the Terminus slaughterhouse. TWD will never portray evil Muslims. It made its commitment to Islam through having a character recite from allegedly the Koran at the opening of Season 8: “May my mercy prevail over my wrath.” This is Dawah, or proselytizing Islam under the radar of dialogue.”
An evil Muslim walker would mirror the repressed character and yearings of the average Muslim.
CAIR doubtless warned the writers and producers of TWD that to portray Muslims as grotesque“ walkers” preying on the living would be regarded as “offensive” and “denigrating.” It would reflect on what Islamic jihadists do daily.
And CAIR doubtless gave TWD a pass on the mercy-wrath homily, confident that most people would not question its authenticity. It sounds Islamic and genuine. In point of fact, the homily sounds Christian, not Islamic. It’s the moral kind of imperative that Jesus would preach, not Mohammad.
The malice displayed by Nancy Pelosi in the House casts her in the role as Alpha, the murderous, malevolent leader of the Whisperers. She has done everything in her power to block President Trump’s border wall and other proposals in his agenda.  She is complemented by one dimwit, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and the two rabid anti-Semite Muslims, Omar and Tlaib. The other Dems do Pelosi’s bidding, and rally ‘round the anti-Semites  Omar and Tliab. The Dem herd does Pelosi’s bidding, and rallyies  ‘round Omar and Tliab. Pelosi has endorsed the idea of abolishing the electoral college, and granting illegal immigrants the right to vote and the whole panoply of welfare state benefits.  She will endorse the passing of the “Equality Act”, which is intended to “normalize” LGBTs by making any discrimination against them punishable. She is willing to allow thousands of illegal immigrants to break into the country to better the Dems’ election prospects in the 2020 election.
The Dems – as our Congressional Whisperers – are determined to rob Americans of every freedom at every turn on the crooked road to socialism and collectivism.

Violent Religions

Violent Religions

A Pakistani mob howling for Bibi’s neck.

If you want evidence that Britain has gone down the Yellow Brick Road to Islam in a state of advanced dhimmitude – there is this tidbit to support your suspicion. It refuses to grant asylum to an Iranian who converted to Christianity and left Islam. The reason he was rejected for asylum was because, the government said, Christianity was a violent religion.

And then there is the plight of Asia Bibi, a Christian Pakistani woman with a Muslim mob howling for her head. She, too, has been refused asylum, not because the government thinks Christianity is “violent,” but because granting her asylum would cause trouble in Britain.

Theresa May, the prime minister of the United Kingdom, stated that “the news would be welcomed around the world, and the UK was committed to the global abolition of the death penalty.” According to the British Pakistani Christian Association, Bibi appealed to Britain [after her acquittal of the charge of blasphemy] for asylum but was denied because her presence in the country might stir unrest among “certain sections of the population.”

Those “certain sections” being Muslim, of course. Perhaps she meant the Pakistani rapists of Rotherham. They might become “violent” and “groom” even more girls just to show May who’s boss.
Neon Nettle reported on March 22nd:

Immigration officials in the UK responded to the man’s application and ‘explained’ why they were discriminating against him. Biblical passages from the books of Leviticus and Revelation were cited by immigration officials to back up their rejection for asylum.
According to The Times report: Immigration officials wrote to the man citing violent passages from the Bible to prove their point. They said that the Book of Revelation was “filled with imagery of revenge, destruction, death, and violence.”

Godfather Politics also reported on the 22nd:
In yet another example that Britain is a lost and fetid nation, a Christian from Syria, who left Islam and converted to Christianity, was denied asylum because British officials claim that Christianity is not a peaceful religion.
During an asylum hearing for an Iranian convert from Islam, the UK’s immigration agency claimed that Christianity isn’t a peaceful religion, and quoted Bible passages to prove their claim, the Independent reported.

The asylum seeker said that he left Islam for Christianity because Christianity was a peaceful religion and that by leaving Islam his life was put in danger. But the British court said it was clear that Christians are not peaceful people.

The implication is that Islam is a “peaceful religion” and that Christians were not “peaceful.”
The immigration officials obviously cherry-picked violent sections from the Bible – Leviticus and Revelation – to prove their point. They could have also cited the Middle Ages, the Inquisition, and the wars raged by the Vatican, and the beginnings of Christianity in the immediate post- Roman Empire era (such as the brutal murder of Hypatia circa 415 in Alexandria by fanatical Christians).  Not to mention the violent persecution of the French Huguenots.  But today, Christians are “peaceful” and the Church – Anglican or otherwise – does not preach violence.
However, if they were looking for a religion that is consistently, and almost daily, violent, they need not look further than the Koran. But to cite the Koran as a sanctified prescription for killing and carnage, would upset Muslims. And, besides, to admit an apostate – a man who has left Islam for  Christianity, would probably precipitate demonstrations and, well, more Muslim violence.

They wouldn’t have needed to cherry-pick the Koran or the Hadith to find violence or urgings to follow violence; these works are celebrations of violence.

The Times reported that,
Immigration officials wrote to the man, who had converted to Christianity on the ground that it was a peaceful religion, citing violent passages from the Bible to support their claim. They said that the Book of Revelation was “filled with imagery of revenge, destruction, death and violence”.
The Church of England condemned the “lack of religious literacy” after the man said that he now faced persecution in Iran for his faith. Church officials called for a “serious overhaul” of Home Office policies.

Neon Nettle, from its July 2018, report, “UK Government Caught Rejecting Christian Refugees, Accepting Muslims Only”:

The UK has accepted over 1,100 Muslim Syrian refugees but refused Christians according to reports. Even despite the suffering of Christians during seven years of civil war, including the persecution by Islamic State, the UK government still refused to accept Christian refugees. In official figures, 4,832 Syrians were invited to settle in the UK last year, only 11 were Christian.

As an atheist, God means as little to me as does Allah. It has been that way for me since the age of 15, when I concluded, without having ever heard the arguments of the most notable atheists, that God was a metaphysical impossibility and a moral abomination. Allah was a mystical concept I had yet to hear of at that age. Both concepts are connected to the notion of a “first cause.” God is alleged to have conceived of and created the universe, while Islam claims that it was Allah who worked the cosmological magic, or just snapped his fingers.It’s a coin toss.

As for a “first cause,” which rejects the idea that existence exists and has always existed, Wikipedia narrates that
Since Georges Lemaître first noted in 1927 that an expanding universe could be traced back in time to an originating single point, scientists have built on his idea of cosmic expansion. The scientific community was once divided between supporters of two different theories, the Big Bang and the Steady State theory, but a wide range of empirical evidence has strongly favored the Big Bang which is now universally accepted.

Groucho Marx as Mohammad

But a “first cause” is not the chief subject of this column, but rather the discrimination the British government practices against Christians. Neon Nettle continues:

Islamic State fanatics have attacked Christians and churches, as well as carrying out the genocide of Yazidis and other religious minorities. Last week its forces set off bombs in the Syrian city of Sweida, which killed 215 people in an area that blends elements of Christianity, Judaism and Hinduism. Lately, jihadists vandalized several French cathedrals.

This ends the latest instance of my committing “cyber terrorism,” leaving readers,  Muslims and government speech censors quaking at their knees, salving their hurt feelings with Ben Gay, while calling for the banishment of “Islamophobia” and ill-feeling for Islam and Muslims. Robert Spencer reported on March 16th in Jihad Watch.

The International Union for Muslim Scholars (IUMS) has called on non-Muslim countries to ban Islamophobia, following the killing of dozens of people on a deadly attack on two mosques in New Zealand.
“IUMS calls on non-Muslim countries to ban the spread of hatred against Islam and Muslims,” IUMS President Ahmed al-Raisouni said in a statement at the conclusion of a 2-day session held in Istanbul on Friday….

Islamic censorship is a form of violent jihad, but most Western governments purchase it under the guise of “freedom of speech” and being opposed to “hatred.” It relies on the initiation of government force, with the help of the big information tech companies, to zip mouths, break pens in half, and crush keyboards. There is little difference between censorship and gunning down an editorial staff to silence it, with or without the help of Google, Facebook, or Twitter.

Misgendering Allah

AnnieJones, as Allah,
P.T. Barnum freak, 1865-1892

This column is devoted to the evil of Islam, and also to mock that “religion.” This is about the bearded lady of carnival fame. Perhaps “it” belongs to the LGBQetc. “community.”

The title of this column was inspired by this horrific story from the UK., “Catholic journalist to be questioned by police after misgendering a trans woman”. Misgendering is a neologism the product of politically correct speech.  
A devout Catholic journalist and commentator has claimed Surrey Police intends to investigate her after she called a young, transgender woman by the wrong pronouns….
Caroline Farrow, who has taken part in broadcasts such as Question Time and BBC News in the past, appeared on ITV’s Good Morning Britain back in September 2018 to talk about whether Girl Guides’ leaders should be able to tell parents whether any members identify as transgender. The broadcast aired in the wake of two leaders, who challenged the code, being expelled….
After their joint appearance on the show, Green claims that Farrow sent her trans daughter “very deliberately malicious and nasty messages,” which led her to report her to the police – not the fact that Farrow ‘simply’ misgendered her child. Farrow took to Twitter on 20 March to detail how Surrey Police recently contacted her saying it wants her to take part in a taped interview. …
“I can’t sleep I am so furious,” she wrote on social media. “I don’t even remember said tweets. I probably said ‘he’ or ‘son’ or something. All I have been told is that following an appearance on Good Morning Britain I made some tweets misgendering Susie Green’s child.”
You see, there are only a few passages in the Koran that refer to Allah as a man, or as  a man-like entity, that refer to “Him,” or say “His.” Aside from his prophet, Mohammad, being rape happy.   There are no purported images, and no descriptions of Allah. Descriptions are likely forbidden. For example,
5:33: “This is the recompense of those who fight against Allah and His Messenger, and hasten about the earth, to do corruption there: they shall be slaughtered, or crucified, or their hands and feet shall alternately be struck off; or they shall be banished from the land. That is a degradation for them in this world; and in the world to come awaits them a mighty chastisement.”
9:111: “Allah has bought from the believers their selves and their possessions against the gift of Paradise; they fight in the way of Allah; they kill, and are killed; that is a promise binding upon Allah in the Torah, and the Gospel, and the Koran; and who fulfils his covenant truer than Allah? So rejoice in the bargain you have made with Him; that is the mighty triumph.”
From my standpoint, you can’t take seriously the notion of Allah (aka God and Yahweh) without having a chuckle or two, especially when  Islam is shilled as a “religion of peace,” (see Robert Spencer’s The History of Jihad)   given its blood-drenched history of 1,400 years and counting. Allah is usually depicted in the Koran and the Hadith as being “merciful.” Or forgiving. Or compassionate.
9:5: “Then, when the sacred months are drawn away, slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them, and confine them, and lie in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they repent, and perform the prayer, and pay the alms, then let them go their way; Allah is All-forgiving, All-compassionate.”
That passage is without doubt an endorsement of “tolerance.”
That Allah is of an ambiguous gender is this passage from the Koran, which seems to be an endorsement of a bisexual Playboy Club:
They are to cohabit with demure virgins…as beauteous as corals and rubies…full-breasted maidens for playmates…in the gardens of delight…. They’re to lie face to face on jewelled couches, and be serviced by immortal youths…young boys, their personal property, as comely as virgin pearls…. We created the houris [dancing girls] and made them virgins, carnal playmates for those on the right hand…. We are going to wed them to dark-eyed houris. [55:56; 55:58; 78:33; 56:12; 52:16-17, 24; 56:35-38; 52:20]
 “Serviced” by “Young boys…as comely as virgin pearls”?  
In point of fact, the killing of any non-Muslims by Muslims is neither acknowledged, nor celebrated or protested. The Ummah remains mute. The Koran permits and encourages such killing. The better to reduce the numbers of infidels to fight and to make way for the Islamic “master race,” Nazi style.
I reproduce there my former column, “Islam is Evil.”
The Koran says:
Qur’an 9:5 Fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, harass them, lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war.
Doubtless a so-called “civil rights” organization like CAIR (The Council on America n-Islamic Relations) would shed crocodile tears on the murders (the probable rape and beheadings of two Scandinavian hikers in the Atlas Mountains of Morocco), and continue on its campaign of “eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”  So says the Explanatory Memorandum. But CAIR and its useful, parroting idiots will say “This is not Islam.” CAIR or the MSN or the ICN or ISN would file a lawsuit asserting that “to oppose the construction of a mosque in your neighborhood, because a mosque would create traffic and congestion, is to oppose Islam” and claim “freedom of religion.”
One can imagine the head honchos of CAIR chomping on popcorn as they watched the video of the Scandinavian girls being raped and beheaded.
Why were these two women so vulnerable to the bestiality of these Muslims? Had they aninkling that they had been stalked? That they had been marked for torment and death? No.  Did they have a can of Mace or pepper spray ready? We don’t know yet. See the beheading video on Pamela Geller’s report here.
Danes and Norwegians, like other Scandinavians, are taught to be tolerant of Islam and to never question or doubt its “peacefulness.” They’re subjected to that brand of lobotomy from grade school and are consequently disarmed, so have no objective measure of Islam and what its adherents believe or are capable of. The rape statistics in Sweden are horrendous and the government there suppresses them so that people do not become anti-immigrant or anti-Islam. This is also the case in Germany and the U.K., where laws are in effect to punish citizens for speaking out against Islam, even though the rapes (e.g., Rotherham, etc) are committed largely by Muslims. It’s common knowledge, even to the police, who are not permitted by the state to think badly of Muslims, and who are more likely to arrest a non-Muslim for speaking ill publically or privately on the Internet about Islam.
The political and educational environment these women were raised in had sabotaged and scuttled their rationality and sense of self-preservation in hostile countries and even in their own countries. They’ were taught to ignore the reality of Islam, even though the bestiality of the religion is almost daily reported in crime news. Islamophobia is the new thoughtcrime. The term, Islamophobia, was popularized by the Iranians and Muslim theorists. It is a form of George Orwell’s doublethink. “”Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.” (Nineteen Eighty-Four” Book 2, Chapter 3) That is, you must both fear Islam and Allah, and also not think of them as perilous or inimical but as your huggy-bear and glad-hander and source of spiritual consolation (They’re not dangerous! proclaimed the signs of Europeans welcoming boatloads of immigrants into their countries ).
(Parenthetically, Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch searched for the origin of the term Islamophobia; “My conclusion was that it had originated in Britain and had almost certainly been coined not by a Muslim but a pitifully dhimmified Jew, the “anti-racism” campaigner Richard Stone. He was one of the authors of a letter to the Guardian in 1994, which was the first recorded use I could find of the term.)
Quran (4:24)“And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.” Allah even permitted Muhammad and his men to have sex with married slaves, such as those captured in battle.
It continues: And also forbidden to you are all married women (muhsanat) except those women whom your right hands have come to possess (as a result of war). This is Allah’s decree and it is binding upon you. But it is lawful for you to seek out all women except these, offering them your wealth and the protection of wedlock rather than using them for the unfettered satisfaction of lust. And in exchange of what you enjoy by marrying them pay their bridal-due as an obligation. But there is no blame on you if you mutually agree to alter the settlement after it has been made. Surely Allah is All-Knowing, All-Wise.
So,  Louisa Vesterager Jespersen, of Denmark, and Maren Ueland, of Norway, were “taken in war” against the infidels. They were likely gang-raped (there were at least three Muslims who attacked them) before having their throats cut, while one of them was beheaded. “Allah wills it,”  one of the men said on the video. “In the video, the perpetrators can be heard saying the murders were revenge for air strikes carried out by Western bombing missions in war-torn Syria.  “This is for Syria, here are the heads of your Gods,’ a man can be heard saying, as well as ‘this is in revenge for our brothers in Hajin.“
Horrific images showing one of the murdered Scandinavian tourists being beheaded in Morocco have been sent to a victim’s mother, it has emerged. 
ISIS fanatics gloated about the killing of Dane Louisa Vesterager Jespersen, 24, and Norwegian Maren Ueland, 28, by spreading the gruesome footage on social media.
The clip, in which a suspected ISIS terrorist shouts “Allah’s will,” was also sent to friends of Ms Jespersen via ‘private messenger’, it has been claimed.
Here is a selection of Koranic verses that should give you a taste of Allah’s “mercy.” Allah makes Negan, the super villain of The Walking Dead, look like a wussified amateur or a kindly parish priest.
4:89: “They wish that you should disbelieve as they disbelieve, and then you would be equal; therefore take not to yourselves friends of them, until
5:33: “This is the recompense of those who fight against Allah and His Messenger, and hasten about the earth, to do corruption there: they shall be slaughtered, or crucified, or their hands and feet shall alternately be struck off; or they shall be banished from the land. That is a degradation for them in this world; and in the world to come awaits them a mighty chastisement.”
5:38: “And the thief, male and female: cut off the hands of both, as a recompense for what they have earned, and a punishment exemplary from Allah; Allah is All-mighty, All-wise.”
8:12: “When thy Lord was revealing to the angels, ‘I am with you; so confirm the believers. I shall cast into the unbelievers’ hearts terror; so smite above the necks, and smite every finger of them!’”
8:39: “Fight them, till there is no persecution and the religion is Allah’s entirely; then if they give over, surely Allah sees the things they do.”
8:60: “Make ready for them whatever force and strings of horses you can, to terrify thereby the enemy of Allah and your enemy, and others besides them that you know not; Allah knows them. And whatsoever you expend in the way of Allah shall be repaid you in full; you will not be wronged.”
 9:5: “Then, when the sacred months are drawn away, slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them, and confine them, and lie in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they repent, and perform the prayer, and pay the alms, then let them go their way; Allah is All-forgiving, All-compassionate.”
No critique of Islam would be complete without mentioning its quest to impose Sharia on all people, regardless of or in opposition to one’s religion, FMG (female genital mutilation), honor killing, and misogyny. Islam seeks to make life as miserable as possible by force or by deception.
A hairless Allah in his (her) Halloween mode.
Beware of the dog. The illiterate, psychopathic Mohammad is quite verbose, as most super villains are.

 Above is Annie Jones, a circus sideshow freak. P.T. Barnum was her “prophet. But you can also imagine Allah as Casper the Friendly Ghost in his (or her) Halloween

The Red Thread

There is more blatant corruption, sniveling conspiracy,  and underhanded intrigue revealed in Diana West’s new book, The Red Thread, than in the Kevin Spacey version of The House of Cards, which ran on Netflix from 2013 to 2018. The actors behind the attempted coup against Donald Trump, however, are bland, nondescript nonentities and mediocrities  — James Comey, John Brennan, Christopher Steele, Nellie and Bruce Ohr, Reinhold Niebuhr (Who!?!!), the Kramer brothers, Bill Browder and his family, and a passel of others, none of them engaging actors, able to credibly project the immorality and  villainy of their characters.

None of them is a Frank or Claire Underwood, though their insatiable hunger for power and control is not fictional and their appetite for power nearly cost this country the 2016 election. And the one character in the series I detested the most in House of Cards was Doug Stamper, Frank’s loyal assistant, “researcher,” gofer, arranger, blackmailer, and Mafia-like enforcer.  

They don’t exude or broadcast evil or show any tell-tale signs of duplicity, malice, or a drooling unquenchable appetite for power or a penchant for lying and deceit. They’re about as average-looking as anyone you’d have to wait in line behind at a Wal-Mart check-out. We’re not dealing here with Jack-and-the Beanstock monsters, nor with Leviathans or Behemoths. But rather with a swarm of human termites.
The full title of West’s book is The Red Thread: A Search for Ideological Drivers Inside the Anti-Trump Conspiracy.  Red Threads could be said to be an overture to West’s other knock-em-flat title, American Betrayal (reviewed by me twice (,  is a much longer work that details the rise of Communist influence in the U.S. in the 1930s and during the FDR years.

 “Disinganno,” by Francesco Quierolo, 
marble, Naples, 1754
West found the “drivers” of these conspirators. It took hard work and meticulous and truth-respecting research. On the other hand, given the globalist color of the “investigation” of Donald Trump, the drivers weren’t hard to find.  The information was there but not so hard to grasp. The principal driver was Communism and/or a concomitant hatred and malice for Trump as a threat  to the conspirators’ desire for the status quo. Diana West can be said to be our Francesco Queirolo, the Genoese creator of the 18th century marble sculpture, Release from Deception, which shows a man being freed from an entangling fisherman’s net.
In December 2017, Fox News’ James Rosen broke a pair of stories about a most intriguing married couple, Nellie and Bruce Ohr.
Nellie, we learned, worked as a Russian expert for Fusion GPS, a private research firm that was a nexus of covert pro-Hillary/anti-Trump operations. The firm’s most famous [or notorious] product (brackets mine)  is the set of 16 memos known as the Steele dossier, named for its purported author, retired British intelligence officer, Christopher Steele…[t]his Steele dossier was secretly funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee, which had funneled payments to Fusion GPS via the law firm Perkins Cole. (p. 3)


Nellie’s father, Richard L. Hauke, was a botany professor. His listed works are mainly scientific, but his biographical notes highlight more political interests in creationism, bioethics, and, circa 1983-1985, “nuclear winter.”


Nellie’s husband, Bruce Ohr, was a top official at the Justice Department, which was also, as we learned, a nexus of covert HillaryTrump operations. In his story, Rosen reported that Bruce had been demoted prior to the stoy’s publication for his failure to disclose his wife’s employment with Fusion GPS and his contacts with Steele both before and after the 2016 action…
It is tempting to skip over much of Ohr’s academic history, but much of what West learned is pertinent to understanding the threads she reveals., especially in relation to the Steele dossier.  This is also true about the other principal subjects; Comey, Brennan, et al.
Nellie graduated from Harvard-Radcliffe with a B.A. in Russian history and literature in 1983. While at Harvard, she met Bruce Ohr, her future husband, who would go on to graduate from Harvard Law School in 1987. While her professor father was mulling “nuclear winter,” Harvard Professor Richard Pipes, a well-known scholar of Survival Not Enough: Soviet Realities and America’s Future. In the book…he thanks his assistant, Nellie Hauke for her “dedicated work.”  Not only was Pipes a prominent anti-communist on Harvard’s senior faculty, he had just completed a stint on Ronald Reagan’s National Secuirity Council as Director of East European and Soviet Affairs. Was young Nellie breaking with her family’s political traditions?
 West remarked, “Highly doubtful…”(p. 6)
James Comey is as much a  crooked piece of work as is Robert Mueller., the “special counsel” investigating Trump’s alleged collusion with Russia to secure the 2016 election.  His “moral compass” is a theologian, Reinhold Niebuhr, basically unknown to us today. Wikipedia has this information on him and the description of him fits West’s thread:
Karl Paul Reinhold Niebuhr (1892–1971) was an American Reformed theologian, ethicist, commentator on politics and public affairs, and professor at Union Theological Seminary for more than 30 years…. A public theologian, he wrote and spoke frequently about the intersection of religion, politics, and public policy, with his most influential books including Moral Man and Immoral Society and The Nature and Destiny of Man…. Starting as a minister with working-class sympathies in the 1920s and sharing with many other ministers a commitment to pacifism and socialism, his thinking evolved during the 1930s to neo-orthodox realist theology as he developed the philosophical perspective known as Christian realism…. Niebuhr’s contributions to political philosophy include utilizing the resources of theology to argue for political realism. His work has also significantly influenced international relations theory, leading many scholars to move away from idealism and embrace realism.[25] A large number of scholars, including political scientists, political historians, and theologians, have noted his influence on their thinking. Aside from academics, numerous politicians, and activists such as former US Presidents Barack Obama[26] and Jimmy Carter;[27] Myles Horton, Martin Luther King Jr., Hillary Clinton, Hubert Humphrey, Dean Acheson, James Comey, Madeleine Albright, and John McCain have also cited his influence on their thought.[… Recent years have seen a renewed interest in Niebuhr’s work, in part because of Obama’s stated admiration for Niebuhr.
Comey the “Christian” realist, after investigating Hillary Clinton’s basement server, and finding that it violated national security, hoving on or  near treason, decided that the most “realist” thing to do was  to not  indict her. She was extremely “careless,” averred  Comey, but not “criminal.”

West writes:
The key to Comey seems to be the constant in his intellectual life: Reinhold Niebuhr.  Whether as a college Communist studying Niebuhr in the Reagan years, a top Republican appointee to the Bush Justice Department, , or a post-Republican, an ex-FBI Director fired by Trump, James Comey has consistently attested to Niebuhr’s deep influence on his thinking….
Niebuhr was a prominent, militant member of the Socialist Party (1930-1940), publicly well-known of his Marxist “ideas and approaches”…including “social ownership” of property, the use of violence to bring about political change, and his membership in over one dozen Communist organizations, including in leadership positions, which advanced the Kremlin line. …(p. 41)
In 1941, Niebuhr, with 16 co-authors, signed on to “A Declaration of World Democracy” in The City of Man, a slim volume pointing to the Constitution’s repeal. Certainly, the Bill of Rights had to go – or be tied, the authors write, to a “Bill of Duties” and supplemented by a Bill of Economic Rights.” To wit: “But the Bill of Rights pledging that no private property shall be ‘taken for public use without just compensation ‘ must be supplemented with a Bill of Duties stating that no private property can be tolerated outside the framework of just social use.” (p. 44)
West makes it obvious, in discussing Comey’s moral roots, that one of his principal drivers was the activism of a Leftist theologian.
Finally, on Comey, the dillitante and practitioner of Niehuhrian Pragmatism, West quotes from Comey’s college thesis, to underscore his conviviality with the conspirators:
However, it is wrong for the Christian [Niebuhr writes] “to regard every political decision as simply derived from our faith. This is a wrong answer because political issues deal with complex problem of justice, every solution for which contains  morally ambiguous  elements. All political positions are morally ambiguous because in the realm of politics  and economics, self-interest and power must be harnessed and beguiled rather than eliminated. In other words, forces that are dangerous  must be used despite their peril….{Emphasis added}
No, writes West, “in other words, “the ends justify the means. Pre-exonerating Hillary Clinton in the FBI investigation of her unsecured server – and failing to conduct the required damage assessment of the security breach – is really nothing on the Niebuhr-Comey spectrum of amoral possibility. …It is the duty of a Christian in politics to have no specific “Christian politics.” (p. 47)
Nor is it anything which Comey, Niebuhr, and the anti-Trump conspirators ever much chewed their nails over.
While West provides us with a cornucopia of  clues to the moral “back story” of each these creatures, I couldn’t pass up this gem, which I’d read in unconfirmed reports of before, but West confirms it: Former CIA director John Brennan converted to Islam.

In the post Labor-Day-stretch of the 2016 campaign, …Brennan began to unravel his own red thread. It went back four decades to the Ford-Carter presidential contest in 1976, when, as a 21yeear old Fordham University political science major, John Brennan decided to vote for Communist Party USA boss Gus Hall. Lenin School graduate, U.S. convicted revolutionary and, by 1976, a Soviet puppet for nearly five decades…
Brennan was CIA director then he exploded this CP bombshell during a September 16, 2016, panel discussion of “diversity  in the intelligence community.” Given that the CIA was organized to help stop Communist expansion abroad, what better defines “diversity” in its ranks than hiring a 1976 supporter of expanding communism in this country ? Not much – except perhaps elevating John Brennan to direct the flagship agency in an era of resurgent jihad . accordingly to  fomer FBI special agent and Islam subject-matter expert John Guandolo and former CIA chief of station Brad Johnson. Brennan was the target of a successful Saudi intelligence operation to convert him to Islam during Brennan’s stint, circa 1996, as CIA station chief  in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. As Guandolo has stated: “The facts of the matter are confirmed by U.S. government officials  who were in Saudi Arabia the same time.
This is the same Brennan who protested Donald Trump cancelling Brennan’s security clearance.

Diana West concludes her mesmerizing expose’  with:
While still a work in progress, I hope this study recalibrates our focus on events. The anti-Trump conspiracy is not about Democrats and Republicans. It is not about the ebb and flow of political power, lawfully and peacefully transferred. It is about globalists and nationalists, just as the president says. They are locked in the old and continuous Communist/anti-Communist struggle, and fighting to the end, whether  We, the anti-Communists, recognize it or not.
I pray we recognize it.

As she intimated here: More to come. Stay tuned.

Codifying Islamophobia

Islam is what I say it is! It says so right here!

A law code or legal code, is a type of legislation that purports to exhaustively cover a complete system of laws or a particular area of law as it existed at the time the code was enacted, by a process of codification. Though the process and motivations for codification are similar in different common law and civil law systems, their usage is different.
In a civil law country, a code of law typically exhaustively covers the complete system of law, such as civil law or criminal law.
 Britain is fatally infected by Islam. Bill Warner, founder of the Center for the Study of Political Islam, tells why.
The subject is the 72-page All-Party Parliamentary Group’s  Islamophobia Defined.; Warner stresses that in it Islamophobia is not defined. The legal beagles of Britain in every district have been ordered to weigh in on the meaning and ramifications of “Islamophobia” with the aim of not only banning it at the behest of resident Muslims, but recommending punishments for its expression . Warner also stresses that no definition of Islamophobia has been settled or what the term means by definition, nor what Islam is.
The purpose of the Group is:
To combat Islamophobia by investigating the forms, manifestations and extent of prejudice, discrimination and hatred against Muslims in the UK, while reviewing legislation and policy, the recording and prosecution of hate crimes, the role of the media, and the use of social media platforms as a means for spreading hatred.
Nor does the Koran, the Hadith, or the Sunna occur in the document.  Experts, activists, and Islamophobia “victims are all cited in the paper, except for Allah and Mohammad. Neither does it distinguish between Islam and Muslims.
“Muslims are people, Islam is a doctrine.”
Warner notes that 94% of British Muslims say that Islam is compatible with the British way of life. How can that be? he asks.  But wife beating is against British law, whereas Islam condones it in the Koran, the Hadith, and the Sunna.  It is a key element of the Shania.
Islamophobia causes harm, if it offends Muslims.
An Islamic “expert” states that Islamophobia is racist, it is bigoted, it causes Muslims harm, suffering, or hurt feelings. Warner makes the same point as I’ve made elsewhere, that Islamophobia has no metaphysical power to physically harm anyone. It has the potency of the term “jerk” or “doofus.”
The Group paper does not argue against freedom of speech. It upholds freedom of speech, as long as the speech or written word not against Islam or Muslims, or critical of it.
“This is all about Muslimology, a social study.  It’s all about opinion, not fact. They see it as a pure social construct….Islamophobia is rooted in racism that targets Muslimness or perceived Muslimness.  I didn’t know that Muslimness was a word.  But it is now.”
Justice to the Muslims means bringing punishment to the Islamophobes.
The document even states that all the U.K. is Islamophobic….that the entire society is Islamophobic. They say that arguments over freedom of speech is “subtle racism.” They also add that to say that Islam it not a race, is a racist argument.
“This document is purely subjective, instead of being objective. The term Muslim is used in virtually every paragraph, but Islam rarely. This whole paper is about victimology.”
“Everything that’s right wing is negative, and not one leftist organization is bad. All suffering and shortfalls in the U.K. caused by Islamophobia. Nothing that Muslims do is bad. This is an elitists document that attempt to limit free speech while saying that we don’t want to limit free speech. This is all globalist, elitist talk. It’s all about feelings, Muslims’ feelings.”
The Group document cites “one ‘expert’ after another, but not Allah or Mohammad. Not one fact about Islam is cited.”
“Everyone gets free speech, but Muslims can’t be offended. This is some kind of pseudo science that depends on surveys. Islam is said to be purely religious and without fault. There is some mention of the ‘Other,’ but never mentionsthe Kaffir.”
Warner says that this is a strategic totalitarian plan. They want to make Islamophobia a crime, and wants to make it a crime to say anything that offends Muslims’ feelings. Facts are irrelevant, and blasphemy laws are enforced by the State. Everyone in Britain becomes a dhimmi. This whole  document is a vast lie.
“Out of the 21 members of Parliament listed in this document, 14 are Muslim, 2/3rds of them. If you want Islam to be a jihadist document, you ask a jihadi Muslim. If you want it to be peaceful, you ask a peaceful Muslim.  In short, Islam will be whatever the 14 members want it to be.”
Jihad Watch reported on December 4th that U.K. Muslims
demand criminalization of “Islamophobic” “racism” that targets their “Muslimness.”
Muslims in the UK are demanding full legal protection from “Islamophobia,” and the definition of “Islamophobia” has finally been articulated:
Islamophobia is rooted in racism and is a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness.
There are already hate crime laws in the UK:
A hate crime can include verbal abuse, intimidation, threats, harassment, assault and bullying, as well as damage to property
What exactly are the Muslim Council of Britain and other Muslim groups seeking that is not already covered by British law?
Another site, reports on Islamophobia being regulated on or banned from the Internet. Jonahtan Turley , on October 5th reported, “Britain Moves to criminalize  extremist material on the Internet.”
For years, civil libertarians have warned that Great Britain has been in a free fall from the criminalization of speech to the expansion of the surveillance state.  Now the government is pursuing a law that would make the repeated viewing of extremist Internet sites a crime punishable to up to 15 years in prison.  It appears that the government is not satiated by their ever-expanding criminalization of speech. They now want to criminalize even viewing sites on the Internet.  As always, officials are basically telling the public to “trust us, we’re the government.”  UK home secretary Amber Rudd is pushing the criminalization of reading as part of her anti-radicalization campaign . . . which turns out to be an anti-civil liberties campaign….
Prime Minister Theresa May has previously called for greater government control of the Internet.  Now, the government not only would make reading material on the Internet a crime, but would not necessarily tell you what sites will be deemed the ultimate click bait.  Rudd told a Conservative Party conference that she wants to crackdown on people “who view despicable terrorist content online”….
But,  whose government? Pakistan’s?

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén