The Official Blog Of Edward Cline

Adventures in the Surveillance State


Auditors of the ongoing
conquest of the West
by Islam, the nightmarish
bogeyman
, can’t help but notice that most Western governments, charged with
protecting their citizens from Islamic jihad, are cowards too afraid to
identify their enemy (other than the citizenry), or are in sympathy with it, but
 also are too sensitive to being accused
of censorship when they wish to have information suppressed or erased from
public knowledge.  That term, censorship, is so fraught with ominous,
negative connotations, that governments avoid it like the plague. Instead they work
by proxy, and require private communications entities like Google to do the
dirty work.

Melissa Cochran (pictured), the wife of US tourist
Kurt
who died, was left covered in blood on the pavement of
Westminster Bridge and comforted by a passer-by
after being badly injured.

And if these entities do not or refuse to do the dirty work, and let
slip unpalliative facts or ideas or videos, they will be punished instead.
Unlike in George Orwell’s novel Nineteen
Eighty- Four
, in which the government (or the Party), if it detected or
accused one of thoughtcrime, would
hustle you off to Room 101, where you would be tortured and made to become a
lover of and  true believer in the
Party’s aims, agenda, and methods, and  then
memory of your existence would subsequently be erased by the government’s
extensive “fake news” apparatus.  Breitbart London  has this revelation. It’s interesting that
Winston Smith, the protagonist in Orwell’s novel, was employed by the Party to
create the very thing he was an expert at doing: creating fake news. An urge to
discover the truth got him converted and erased.  

Trolled: The  Muslim pedestrian wearing a brown headscarf
and
grey coat was seen walking past a victim being treated
 on the pavement
while looking at her mobile phone.
“It’s just another dead kaffir, no big deal, Praise be
to Allah.”

On the very day of the attack, The
Independent
again reported Theresa May’s cross-eyed designation of Islam as
a “great faith”

The
Prime Minister has said the “Islamist” attack
on Parliament was not “Islamic” and Islam is a “great faith”.
Adding:
“This act of terror was not an act of faith. It was a perversion; a warped
ideology, which leads to an act of terrorism like that and it will not
prevail.”
Au
contraire
, Theresa,
it was an act of faith. Khalid
Masood
was certain that Allah would give him extra brownie points for
killing infidels and becoming a “martyr.”
Wake-up call for Theresa, per that
“great religion.” Is it “great’ to her because it underscores the virtue of
self-sacrifice and the sacrifice of others?
Qur’an’2:191-193:
“And slay them wherever you come upon them, and expel them from where they
expelled you; persecution is more grievous [sic]
than slaying. But fight them not by the Holy Mosque until they should fight you
there; then, if they fight you, slay them — such is the recompense of
unbelievers, but if they give over, surely Allah is All-forgiving,
All-compassionate. Fight them, till there is no persecution and the religion is
Allah’s; then if they give over, there shall be no enmity save for evildoers.”
4:89:
“They wish that you should disbelieve as they disbelieve, and then you would be
equal; therefore take not to yourselves friends of them, until they emigrate in
the way of Allah; then, if they turn their backs, take them, and slay them
wherever you find them; take not to yourselves any one of them as friend or
helper.”
47:4:
“When you meet the unbelievers, smite their necks, then, when you have made
wide slaughter among them, tie fast the bonds; then set them free, either by
grace or ransom, till the war lays down its loads. So it shall be; and if Allah
had willed, He would have avenged Himself upon them; but that He may try some
of you by means of others. And those who are slain in the way of Allah, He will
not send their works astray.”
Qur’an:8:39:
“So fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief [non-Muslims]) and all
submit to the religion of Allah alone (in the whole world).”
Ishaq:
324
: “He said, ‘Fight them so that there is no more rebellion, and
religion, all of it, is for Allah only. Allah must have no rivals.’”
Qur’an: 9:14:
“Fight them and Allah will punish them by your hands, lay them low, and cover
them with shame. He will help you over(come) them.”
Had enough? There are a few dozen
more in the same vein. Yes, Theresa, Islam is a “great” religion – for
homicidal maniacs.
Rather, Theresa said, the London
attack was “Islamist.” Whatever that means. The distinction is lost on me. A
chocolate cake can be described as “cakist.” How can a “warped ideology” be
warped? The Islamic ideology is already “warpish.” The cross-eyed lady said
that the terrorist action was a “perversion.” Whatever that means about, as Islam,
which worships death, as do innumerable Satanic cults. Reason, however, is
prohibited from entering any discussion of Islam, or from entering May’s mind.

P.M.  Theresa
May: “You have no business or right to know
        the
identity of who threatens you or killed you. That would be racist
and Islamophobic!”

 Pamela
Geller
notes:

Islamism
is generally defined as a political interpretation of Islam. Some critics argue
Islam is intrinsically political – as the Quran mandates a religious state and
law – and say the term is irrelevant.
MPs
almost unanimously agreed with the Prime Minister, lining up to warn against
“demonising” and “stigmatising” Muslims, and to condemn “Islamophobia” and
“racial and religious” discrimination.
What was the name of that British sit-com
that mocked the government? Oh, yes. “Yes, Minister.” And then
it became “Yes, Prime Minister.”
And what do we see here? “Yes, Prime Minister.” “Hear, Hear!”
In the meantime, St. Theresa doesn’t want you
to know what’s imperiling your life. The London Telegraph, in its March 24th
article, “Exclusive:
Google and social media companies could be prosecuted if they show extremist
videos
,” wrote:
Google, Facebook and
other internet companies could be prosecuted if they do not stop extremist
videos from being seen on their websites by people in Britain, The Daily
Telegraph
can disclose.
Ministers are
considering a new law which would mean Google – which owns YouTube – and other
social media sites like Facebook and Twitter can be prosecuted if they allow
such videos to be disseminated.
Theresa May, the Prime
Minister, made clear her displeasure at internet companies that publish
extremist content on Friday, saying “the ball is in their court” over taking
action.
Google publicly
apologised this week after the growing scandal over extremist videos on YouTube
led to a series of companies pulling their adverts from the internet giant.
Google, which owns the
video sharing website YouTube, and other social media sites have an agreement
to take down extremist content within 24 hours when they are alerted to it.

Angela Merkel is listening to you, and
doesn’t like what she’s hearing. Expect
a knock on your door.
(CHRISTOF STACHE/AFP/Getty Images)

May is taking a leaf from
Germany’s Angela Merkel and her drooling authoritarian colleagues.

Breitbart London reported
on March 22nd, in “German
Media Watchdog Instructs Press to Censor Ethnicity and Religion in Reports
”:

 

Germany’s media regulator has revised its code of conduct on reporting
whether crime suspects belong to an ethnic or religious minority after
complaints the previous guidance was unclear.

 

The German Press Council – a
voluntary, industry-run body – says information about a person’s ethnicity shouldn’t
be published “unless there is a justified public interest in doing so.”
The wording agreed Wednesday
replaces previous guidance that said such details should only be published if
there was a link between a person’s ethnicity or religion and the crime.
Numerous German media outlets
complained that the old code was hard to interpret during a breaking news
situation.
They argued that withholding such
information left readers searching for it on questionable social media sites
and stirred conspiracy theories of media cover-ups of migrant crimes.
And that’s right up Theresa’s alley.
Got to police those social media websites! She’ll probably get Mark
Zuckerberg’s help, just as he helped Angela Merkel smother German dissent
against her migrant policies. Breitbart
reported on February
5th
2016 in “Facebook Censorship
and the War on Free Speech”:
Free
speech is under assault — not only in repressive dictatorships suddenly able to
influence global conversations through the Internet, but across the Western
world, and even in the American bastion of free expression.  Absolute
protection for speech as an inalienable right has given way to bitter
squabbling over how much free expression should be sacrificed for various,
ostensibly noble goals, and who the censors will be.
Writing at the Gatestone Institute, British journalist Douglas Murray
looked at Facebook as a battleground in the war on free speech Friday,
recalling a recent case in which the social media giant was “forced to back
down when caught permitting anti-Israel postings, but censoring
equivalent anti-Palestinian postings.”
To this, Murray adds the
disturbing September incident in which German chancellor Angela Merkel was
caught on an open mike, asking Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg if he
would help suppress “anti-immigration” postings… and he replied that he was
already working on it.
“Oh, Mark! You’re such a
disgusting but well-behaved Jew – the Muslims have something there, don’t you
think? – but I need your help to keep my people pacified and in line, and,
frankly, shut up. I don’t want any backtalk from the hoi polloi. My
legacy is on the line here about all the badly-behaved savages I let into
Germany. Can you help me regulate German social media?”

You, the
average American, are now an NSA cryptoanalytic
cipher instantly retrievable any time an NSA wonk
wishes or detects an irregularity he does not approve
of.

And we mustn’t forget
the Big Brotherish surveillance of Americans by our own NSA. Fox’s Tucker Carlson’s eyes were opened wide
when he interviewed a
retired NSA spook
who described in detail the extent of domestic spying on
Americans.  Orwell’s Oceania all-knowing
and all-powerful ruling Party would turn green with envy with the scale and
abilities of the NSA. Binny, the retired spook, categorically denied that the “Deep State
was a conspiracy theory, but was a reality.
We are all in the clutches of another “Deep
State.”

Previous

Once Upon a Time in the West

Next

Ayaan Hirsi Ali

7 Comments

  1. daily updates

    Nice Post keep updating like this,

     Grammarly cost
    grammarly review

  2. daily updates

    Nice Post keep updating like this,

     grammarly discount

  3. daily updates

    Nice Post keep updating like this,

     grammarly discount

  4. daily updates

    Nice Post keep updating like this,

    grammarly student discount

  5. daily updates

    Nice Post keep updating like this,

    "grammarly premium free
    "

  6. daily updates

    Nice Post keep updating like this,

    " grammarly student discount
    "

  7. daily updates

    Nice Post keep updating like this,

    " grammarly student discount
    "

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén