The Official Blog Of Edward Cline

Barack Obama’s Swamp of Evil: Part I

I am convinced that Barack Obama’s strategy
to swamp America with immigrants Muslim and Mexican was inspired by his
watching Star Trek: The Next Generation,
which was broadcast between 1987 and 1994. What he likely took away from the
series was a plan very similar to that of the Borg. As Jean-Luc Picard,
commander of the Enterprise, said of the Borg:  In their collective state, the Borg
are utterly without mercy; driven by one will alone: the will to conquer. They
are beyond
redemption, beyond reason
.
You know what the Borg are, don’t you? That interstellar
beehive of conquered worlds, using the enslaved as disposable pawns in that
will to power? “Resistance is futile.” Resist, and you die. Submit, and you
survive as a numbered cipher in service to the Collective.
That was a good plan, Obama must have thought,
while he was “community organizing” in Chicago and teaching – or maligning or
mis-teaching with tongue in cheek – constitutional law at the University of Chicago,
as a “visiting fellow.”  He was going to “fix”
this country. It was too “white.” Too beholden to the “flawed” Constitution.
Too European.  He had a plan to swamp the
country with Muslims and Mexicans, that is, with any real Mexicans or Central
Americans passing through Mexico to enter the U.S. 
As long as the “immigrants” were brown or black or
fifty shades of gray between those hues, it didn’t matter. It didn’t matter if
they wore burqas or niqabs or baseball caps or Pancho Villa hoodies, one and
all were welcome to come and overwhelm Honky. He certainly wasn’t going to
encourage and enable the invasion of the U.S. by white Europeans who wished to
flee their looting welfare states, as I’m sure many want to. Use the Muslims and
Mexicans as one would use salt and sand on icy roads. Salt will break up the
ice, sand will give traction. After all, grains of salt or sand have no individual
identities. Being Muslims, Mexicans, and assorted varieties of manqués and
ciphers in between those hues,  their “selves”
are inextricably linked to the tribe, the Umma, the Cube, the race, La
Raza
.  You don’t give them dirty
looks or they’ll hit you.
But if you even think of hitting them, you’re
guilty of racism and thoughtcrime.
In the name of multiculturalism, Obama has his own Treky
Prime Directive: Never, ever ask Muslims and Mexicans to discard their stagnant
or alleged cultures and assimilate into American culture and adopt American values
of freedom. To expect them to would confess that “latent”
racism among white and Asian Americans and even among blacks that Obama and
Hillary Clinton are so well-acquainted with. Muslims of whatever race and Mexicans,
even if some of them do resemble Vicente Fox, are not to be
charged with racism.  That, after all, would
be racist.
And then came along the hit TV series, The Walking Dead, in 2010, two years
into his first term, and Barack Obama had another brilliant idea: Treat the herds
of flesh- and wealth-eating Muslims and Mexicans as brainless zombies feeding off
of American efforts and sweat (via the welfare state and protected minority
laws), who have invested – or  infested,
if you like – the U.S. as “the walking dead,” but on the sly, so their feelings
won’t be hurt. (¡Somos los muertos vivientes
y usted no puede tocarnos
!)  Obama won’t reveal that he
has nothing but contempt for the people he claims he represents, or champions,
or uses his executive powers for. Muslims and Mexicans are merely pawns in his
quest for power. Please! No falafels or enchiladas at the White House dinner
table! We’re not that common! Michelle! You spilled some of that Sauce
Cardinal
all over your $500 Erin Featherstone
blouse! Do you think I’m made of money? Oh. That’s right. Taxpayers are made of
money.
The primary goal of Obama’s Borg/Mexican strategy is
to “get Whitey.” That has been the leitmotif of his seven-year reign. To drown civilization
with social and economic ballast as it was drowned by zombies in World War Z.  To get Americans to accept halal food and to whistle “La cucaracha”
while they worked and to fast with their fellow Muslim-citizens on Ramadan or
suffer another terrorist attack and refrain from wearing American flag t-shirts
in the presence of “Mexican-American” high school students.
Dare we call Obama a racist? Yes. Would he admit
it? No, not in so many words. He would deny it in his usual folksy yadda-yadda patois. But if one were to attach a summary
evaluation of his words and actions over the last seven years – aside from his
booby-trapped foreign policy and Marxist economic “reforms” – that’s the only
conclusion one can come to. He’s out to impoverish the country. To “transform”
it. To play the black knock-down game on it as many times as possible until it
swears eternal fealty to the Umma and obeys the Ulema and white Americans revere
Saul Alinsky and Karl Marx and their neighborhood El Salvadoran rapist and thug
with his “colors” tattooed to his chin.
It may be interesting to witness the clash between Muslims
and Mexicans over who gets to lord it over the fetid swamp that will be America
when it’s multiculturally conquered and “properly” ethnically diverse once Obama
is finished stocking it with alligators, escaped pythons, poisonous snakes,
mosquitoes, and unpotable water. The paddle tour will not be as entertaining as
one through The Great Okefenokee Swamp.
On  June 16th on FrontPage Daniel Greenfield wrote
a review of Ann Coulter’s book on this very subject and “amnesty,”
¡Adios, America!.
Amnesty is a sinkhole of corrupt
interests, from businesses looking for cheap labor to Democrats looking for
cheap votes, and panic by fossilized political entities like the NAACP, unions
and the Republican Party; eager to surrender out of fear that they will be be
left behind by the demographic future…..
Coulter’s latest book, “Adios,
America” is an uncompromising attack on the policies, justifications and
rhetoric of amnesty. It’s full of the punchy quotes she’s known for, such as
“Americans ought to be suspicious about being told incessantly fences don’t
work. It’s like being told wheels don’t work”, accompanied by a broad survey of
the entire immigration and illegal immigration debate.
The biggest targets are the latest
efforts at amnesty, from the disastrous Republican amnesty effort to Obama’s
unilateral legalizations, which have been disguised by Orwellian word games.
After years of amnestiers claiming that their amnesty isn’t really amnesty, she
lays out the simple fact that “Any law that forgives an illegal act, in whole
or part, is an amnesty….”
But…but….all those defamed “illegals”
will boost the economy and help to create wealth and not take jobs away from
blacks and whites, won’t they? Isn’t that what the immigrants from Europe did
in the late 19th and early 20th centuries?
Yes. That’s what they did
then.  The catch is that there  was no welfare state for them to hook up to,
either. No federal teats three dozen little piglets could suck on. Nor were
they looking for any. Immigrants of the past, as recently as Cubans, were
looking for freedom – not freedom to loot and become parasites.
As she points out, the vast majority of illegal aliens once
legalized will begin collecting between $14,642 and $36,992 from the taxpayer.
“We’re always told that we need to
amnesty illegals to shore up Social Security. How, exactly, are people who make
so little money that they don’t pay income taxes going to save Social
Security?” she asks.
Mexicans
can play the cultural, economic and civilizational jihad game as well as Muslims. All they need to do is take a leaf
from their Islamic ilk about how to milk the welfare state and never pay into
it.  Soren Kern had some interesting
statistics to report in his Gatestone article, “Welfare Jihad in
Europe
” from May 31st.
Anjem Choudary, a British-born
radical Islamic cleric who lives off the British welfare state, has repeatedly urged
his followers to quit their jobs and claim unemployment benefits so they have
more time to plot holy war against non-Muslims.
Choudary believes that Muslims
are entitled to welfare payments because they are a form of jizya, a tax
imposed on non-Muslims in countries run by Muslims, as a reminder that
non-Muslims are permanently inferior and subservient to Muslims.
In 2010, The Sun reported
that Choudary takes home more than £25,000 ($39,000) a year in welfare
benefits. Among other handouts, Choudary receives £15,600 a year in housing
benefit to keep him in a £320,000 ($495,000) house in Leytonstone, East London.
He also receives £1,820 council tax allowance, £5,200 income support and £3,120
child benefits. Because his welfare payments are not taxed, his income is
equivalent to a £32,500 ($50,000) salary. By comparison, the average annual
earnings of full-time workers in Britain was
£26,936 ($41,000) in 2014.
Moreover,
Kern reports that social welfare fraud of the kind perpetrated in Denmark is being
repeated throughout Europe, and that
a Swedish soldier deployed in
Afghanistan said that he was likely to get less help when he came back to
Sweden than returning jihadists [from Syria and ISIS] were.
What’s
at stake is the composition of the electorate in any election year. Writes
Greenfield about Coulter’s book. The composition will be Borg and Mexican:
The transnational assumption behind
the advocacy for illegal immigration is that the Americans, the French or the
Israelis are not entitled to have their country the way they want it, but must
bow to a higher international agenda. And if the locals don’t like it, they can
always be displaced and replaced by a new herd of voters who may be a financial
burden, but who will always vote the correct way.
 Taking apart the 11 million figure often
bandied about, Coulter contends that it’s more like 30 million and warns that
amnesty is the final and ultimate political issue of the Republic.
“If we lose immigration,” writes
Coulter, “we lose everything.”
Now, isn’t
that “racist”?
Mexicans
can also take another leaf from their Muslim  
compañeros de armas  in Europe once they become permanent, “legalized”
settlers in America who refuse to assimilate.  In 2012, Walid Shoebat discovered something
called the Institute
of Muslim Minority Affairs
. I’m sure La Raza has
a similar organization that researches and describes how the gringo culture can
be made to bend to the Hispanic will.
The manifesto
explains “Muslim Minority Affairs” as more than an organization or a
social concept, but as a calculated foreign policy of the Saudi Ministry of
Religious Affairs, designed to achieve these specific goals. Now, don’t start
denigrating the Saudis. They’re our “friends,” aren’t they?
1) Recruit individual Muslims who
live in non-Muslim lands and transform them as a collective unit by
establishing Islamic centers, educational programs, mosques, and organizations
(like the Islamic
Society of North America
and the Muslim
Students Association
) that serve to prevent Muslims from assimilating into
the cultures of their non-Muslim host nations.

2) Encourage these Muslim residents of non-Muslim host nations to shift the
demographic scales in their own favor by means of population growth—and
separatism—thereby enabling them to more effectively advance an agenda based on
fundamentalist Wahhabi [i.e., Saudi] teachings and the legitimation and spread
of Sharia Law in the West.

3) Eventually the proliferation of Muslims in the host nations will hit
critical mass, tilting those societies toward majority-Muslim status.

4) Ultimately, the host states will join the Muslim commonwealth.
Once the
Muslims have dealt with those pesky, nominally Catholic Mexicans, that is.
To be
continued.

Previous

Book Review: Masculine Power, Feminine Beauty

Next

Stolen Words: Plagiarism à la carte

3 Comments

  1. madmax

    Ed,

    You're coming around to the conclusion that I reached 4 years ago after reading Larry Auster and other Traditionalist Conservative websites. While I am not a Conservative in philosophic fundamentals, I think that the alt-right though it has pernicious elements to it nevertheless understands the anti-white, anti-male, anti-Western assault by the Cultural Marxist Left. They understand it better than anyone else including Objectivists and Libertarians. The typical Objectivist just thinks that being anti-immigration is being "anti-liberty". They don't understand that the Left is waging a demographic war against their ultimate enemy, white Conservative males, via immigration. The Left's intention is to first change the ethnic composition of the country to achieve total political power. Brown and Black people vote Left. When they accomplish this, there will be no right wing or, if you like, pro-liberty politics possible. O'ists don't understand this.

    But further, I'm convinced that ultimately what Leftists want is a racially mixed humanity. They feel if there were no races and if everyone was brown then there would be no dissension. We could all be equal. That's how warped they are. Leftists are salivating that a guy like Dylann Roof went on his rampage. The Left wants all these right wing killers so it can first abolish gun rights and then criminalize non-leftist thought. After that it will be a leftist tyranny. Which is why I don't think that either the anti-Confederate flag or the pro-gay marriage decision are good things in the bigger context. What they signal to me is the beginning of a Leftist McCarthyism that will be the prelude to Leftist tyranny. Yet I'd bet 98% of Objectivists think that both the anti-Confederate Flag backlash and the same sex marriage decision were good cultural trends. I could spit.

    If Ayn Rand had to write AS today, she would have to give the Leftists the explicit plan of replacing whites in North America and Western Europe though mass third world immigration, demographic decline and miscegenation. She would also have to write the novel with Russia having more sanity than America. She wouldn't be able to do it. The Left is far sicker than anything she could imagine.

  2. Edward Cline

    I've also been saying for years that I'm glad Rand died in 1982. She's been spared seeing the grotesque destruction of this country and of civilization. She's also been spared the spectacle of most Objectivists becoming clueless, yeah-saying, formula-spouting ciphers. I don't much associate with them.

  3. Unknown

    The left-wing code word for the subjugation of European white population is "diversity" and their plan of action is called multiculturalism. The plan has been a flaming success. We are practically finished if not past the point of no return.

    Andy Texan

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén