of the National Security Council (NSC), responsible for advising the President
on policies and actions to take to protect the security of the U.S. Their argument is, “He’s a general, and Trump
needs generals to advise him on the right thing to do.”
The main White House
and what kind of advice would he offer President Trump, say, in the context of dealing
Korea’s threats? Has he any conception of what is the right thing to do? Or
would it be colored by his leftist, pragmatist leanings?
had seen service in Iraq and Afghanistan. After 9/11, he became just another
member of the PC-corrupted and PC-educated military hierarchy. Political
correctness had begun to sour many respected military educational venues, such
as West Point and the Air Force Academy. He graduated from the United States Army
Command and General Staff College in 1999. In 2003 McMaster completed an Army War College research fellowship
at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution.
emasculating American security agencies in their fight against Islam, and not
just against Islamic or jihadist terrorism. There is an integral connection
between terrorism and Islam, so deftly and clearly explained by Stephen
Coughlin in his important book, Catastrophic
Failure. The best advisors who do not believe going soft on Islam will
do us any good, but increase the peril Islam poses, will not be available to
offer advice and guidance if McMaster remains as ringleader of the effort to
remove Trump. McMaster cannot discredit or combat Trump’s announced foreign policies;
he can only help to dissolve them and work to return our foreign policies to
the Obama era or to emulate Hillary Clinton’s proposed presidential globalist policies.
He is an operative of the so-called “Deep State” and for all practical purposes
“man in the White House.” McMaster’s priorities comport with the Establishment’s
(including the news media’s) in that it wants America to be Europeanized, its “exceptionalism”
vaporized, and America reduced to being as “exceptional” as Finland, with its
population fractured and cowled into submission and servitude to globalist
aspirations (and, of course, to Islam). Trump is a threat to the globalization
elite, including to George Soros, who, with his NGO compatriots, is busy
replacing Europe’s population
with Muslim savages
and primitives from every quarter of the globe as his most important project.
McMaster apparently is a pawn of Soros. On August 9th, Kit Daniels of InfoWars
is already known that McMaster
was a member of International Institute for Strategic Studies which
was funded by Soros’ Open Society Foundation and another Soros-financed group.
Soros of continuously undermining democratically-elected governments.
began infiltrating the National Security Council as early as May when his
Hill, a member
of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Soros-funded Eurasia
Foundation, joined its staff.
Soros has penetrated the Trump White House,” Stone reported. “Soros has planted
a mole infiltrating the National Security apparatus: a woman named Fiona Hill,
who has a Harvard background, and has been on the Soros payroll and the payroll
of the Open Society Institute.”
had previously helped the Soros-founded Central European University in Hungary
which has tried
to influence the Hungarian government which has defiantly refused EU
migrant quotas and Soros’ meddling in its affairs.
Counsel penned an article, “Why They Hate Trump.” It was email text and I could
find no such article under Liberty Counsel.
all my years of engaging the political and legal processes, I have never seen
the level of vitriol and animosity against a political figure that we are
experiencing today against our President….
extreme and unprecedented hatred being directed at President Trump is not the
result of his unorthodox style. Rather, the animosity is based almost entirely
on their fear of President Trump’s pro-faith, pro-family, and pro-life
advocate of a woman’s right to have an abortion, I view most “conservative” sites
like Liberty Counsel with an eye half open. I am as appalled as is Staver by
the almost ubiquitous malice directed at Trump. While such sites often feature
news I can’t find elsewhere (actual news),
I can’t take seriously people who, on one hand, offer deferential, kneejerk genuflections
to the currently popular moon
muffin (God, Allah, Wontonka, Moloch, whatever), and deny a woman the right to control her own body.
People who deny that individualism (aka “pro-choice”) to women can’t endorse
An odiferous Congressional harpy
Trump for the reasons Staver cites. They might, but those cannot be the
principal reasons. They hate him because he won the 2016 election in the face
of the unremitting vitriol and animosity vomited from the political establishment
and the news media, because he promised to upset the collectivist, globalist
apple cart, of which Hillary Clinton wished to be its donkey; and, to a large
extent, he has done just that, and more than their trepidatious expectations
allowed them to feel without committing themselves to a weaving baskets for
therapy in a sanatorium. Their hatred of Trump is a vengeful one, not based on
want to “impeach” Trump, they want to “pin a rap” on him and are desperately
looking for evidence on which to hang an impeachable offense, and if they can’t
find it, they intend to fabricate one.
Baby Harpies (the news media)
harmonizing their whining hatred for Trump
That is the whole purpose of Special
Counsel Robert Muller’s Russia investigation, to find a party balloon they can
inflate to create a terrible creature. They exist in most strata of the
political realm, and especially in the news media. There is a conspiracy
to stage a “legal” coup against Trump. If it succeeds, who would replace him?
Vice President Pence? It isn’t likely. Trump’s whole loyal staff, and his
Cabinet, would get the boot.