The Official Blog Of Edward Cline

Islam Can Only Go “Mental”


It is my mission in life to kill Jews…and other pigs!
Don’t call me crazy! I know what I’m doing!
I am Allah-Walla’s instrument of justice!

Pamela Geller
highlighted a story on June 2nd from France that caught my attention because it
demonstrated just how far the “City of Light” (Paris) has gone over to “the
dark side,” that is, to Islam.
Muslim who screamed
“Allahu akbar”
while brutally murdering French Jewish woman may not be
tried, “not in his right mind.” The story is taken mostly from The
Times of Israel
.
A Muslim man suspected in the violent murder of an elderly French-Jewish
woman in Paris in early April may not face murder charges, as claims that he
was not in his right mind when he committed the act are being considered.
The suspect has been hospitalized for psychiatric evaluation since his
arrest for the murder of Sarah Halimi, 66, on April 4. His name has not been
released but he is known to be a 27-year-old African Muslim and a neighbor of
the victim.
Halimi was beaten severely before the suspect pushed her to her death out
of the window of her apartment on Vaucouleurs Street in the heavily Muslim 11th
district of Paris, considered a crime-ridden area.
His lawyer, Thomas Bidnic, told AFP on Wednesday that there was a strong
chance he would not be held “criminally responsible” for the murder. The lawyer
based this assessment on the medical advice of the suspect’s examiners.
Judicial experts will now need to determine whether the insanity claims
are valid.

Sarah Halimi,
66, was killed 
on April 4, 2017 in Paris.

From
France, Germany, Sweden, and other European nations come innumerable stories of
Muslims apprehended after committing horrendous crimes only to be declared “mentally
ill” (or who were just too “young” to be treated as adults) and so can’t be
held responsible for the crimes. WND
reports, even though stabbing attacks, vehicle jihad, and suicide bombings are
committed by individuals who are in full possession of their faculties and are
in the right Islamic mind:
Is “mental
illness” the new cover for jihadist attacks on the West?
It certainly
seems that way, says a noted expert on jihad.
The latest
“mentally unstable” young man to launch a seemingly random attack on unarmed
civilians was Zakaria Bulhan, a 19-year-old Somali Muslim who had been
resettled in Norway at the age of 5. Bulhan singled out an American woman in
London and stabbed her to death Wednesday on a busy square filled with
tourists, then injured five others in a stabbing spree before being
apprehended.
“Authorities
have ascribed jihad terror to mental illness on numerous occasions,” said
Robert Spencer, including the Orlando, San Bernardino and Chattanooga attacks
in the United States. Sometimes it sticks, but usually, days, weeks or even
months later, when few people are still paying attention, the police will
retract their earlier statements and admit it was a terrorist attack.
I
have argued in several columns that Islam is a ”theology” or “religion” whose
inescapable political imperatives – and Islam is nothing without its political
character —  command Muslims to spread
and obey the “faith” through terror, murder, mutilation and sexual assault. These
actions require goal-directed action; they are not committed willy-nilly on the
spur of the moment; they are not random instances of wackiness, or a Muslim
suddenly being overwhelmed by a brain wave to shout “Allahu Akbar” and stab or
shoot away.
https://therulesofreason.com/2016/08/the-mental-illness-of-islamic-pc.html
https://therulesofreason.com/2017/02/muslim-mania-and-other-insanities.html
https://therulesofreason.com/2016/07/islam-inculcates-criminality.html
But
if there is any “mental illness,” Muslims are not the only “victims” of it.
Western politicians are burdened and silenced by their own brand of it, chiefly
for fear of being labeled “racist” or “bigots” if they ascribe such “erratic”
and dangerous behavior to the nature of Islam, which can lobotomize or sabotage
one’s rational faculties and banish reason from one’s thought processes.
Daniel
Greenfield
comments
on how the authorities (East, West, South, and North) engage in
tongue-twisting, mental gymnastics to avoid “offending” the Islamic Ummah by
ascribing the latest stabbing, rape, or murder by a member of the Muslim flock
to “mental illness” or lack of employment opportunities, and other external
drivers. The Press complies with the explanations also for fear of raising the
lice-ridden hackles of Muslims. The latest episode occurred in Australia.
Muslim
killers seek to become “perfect” Muslims. Ann Corcoran of The Center for Security
Policy
, details the ongoing
influx
of Muslims into the U.S. in her Refugee
Resettlement and the Hijra to America
(Center for Security Policy, 2015)
explains the “troubled” and obsessed mental state of a Jihadist:
Islamic doctrine
holds that Mohammed is the perfect Muslim and, therefore, that emulation of his
life is evidence of the highest level of devotion for the faithful. According
to the sacred texts and traditions of Islam, Mohammed left his home town of
Mecca in the 7th century and traveled with a small band of followers to the
city of Yatrib (now Medina), in what has become known as the hijra (migration). He did so with the
intent of establishing a new base of operations from which to conquer and rule.
Hijra remains the model to this day for
jihadists who seek to populate and dominate new lands.  Their migrations are not for the purpose of
assimilating peacefully in a new host nation, adopting as their own its
traditions and legal systems. Rather, Mohammed’s followers, in keeping with the
example established by their prophet , are driven first to colonize and then to
transform non-Muslim target societies – whether through violent means or via
stealthy, pre-violent ones favored by the Muslim Brotherhood when it is not
powerful enough to use violence decisively.

Camille Pissarro, Boulevard
Montmartre
,
1897, Hermitage Museum. Paris is no longer
the “City of Light.”

What
Western morality deems as criminal acts, Islam treats as acts of virtue, as
professions of faith and adherence to a primitive “morality.” This is why I
regard it as fruitless to try and instruct Muslims of the wrongness and evil of
their actions when raping, murdering, and looting. That kind of concrete-bound
mentality, especially one that was raised in a culture that permits anything in
terms of dealing with others   and especially in dealing with “outsiders” or
non-believers, i.e.,  infidels – is
immune to “integration,” culturally and epistemologically. Muslim minds are
arrested at nearly the level of chimpanzees in which there is also a “caste”
system or pecking order.
Chimps
are not conceptual creatures, and neither is the average Muslim that does not
resort to violence to be loyal to his “faith.” It is the jihadists who take
Islam literally who become predatory because of clashing priorities in their
minds. But it’s difficult to predict when your average, non-intellectual Muslim
will turn jihadist. Almost to a man, virtually every description of a jihadist
who has committed some crime is that he was “quiet” and an otherwise “nice
guy.”
I
am more and more convinced that, aside from its totalitarian elements, Islam,
from a psychological perspective, deliberately
plants the seed of criminality in the average Muslim
. The essence of any
criminal act is the initiation of force – whether it’s robbery, rape,
vandalism, etc., which is to wish for and take the unearned. I should think
that would be obvious to the occasional reader of the last few weeks’
depredations, from the two Paris massacres to the rape of a 5-year-old
girl in Idaho
by “underage” Muslim boys I see nothing but an inculcated
urge to kill, maim, to inflict pain and humiliation, and this urge is
sanctioned by any number of Koranic verses and Hadiths. Here is a
small handful of Islam sanctioned orders
to commit crimes:
Violent verses from the Koran:
2:191-193: “And slay them wherever you come upon them, and
expel them from where they expelled you; persecution is more grievous than
slaying. But fight them not by the Holy Mosque until they should fight you
there; then, if they fight you, slay them — such is the recompense of
unbelievers, but if they give over, surely Allah is All-forgiving,
All-compassionate. Fight them, till there is no persecution and the religion is
Allah’s; then if they give over, there shall be no enmity save for evildoers.”
4:34: “Men are the managers of the affairs of women for that
Allah has preferred in bounty one of them over another, and for that they have
expended of their property. Righteous women are therefore obedient, guarding
the secret for Allah’s guarding. And those you fear may be rebellious admonish;
banish them to their couches, and beat them. If they then obey you, look not
for any way against them; Allah is All-high, All-great.”
4:89: “They wish that you should disbelieve as they
disbelieve, and then you would be equal; therefore take not to yourselves friends
of them, until they emigrate in the way of Allah; then, if they turn their
backs, take them, and slay them wherever you find them; take not to yourselves
any one of them as friend or helper.”
5:33: “This is the recompense of those who fight against Allah
and His Messenger, and hasten about the earth, to do corruption there: they
shall be slaughtered, or crucified, or their hands and feet shall alternately
be struck off; or they shall be banished from the land. That is degradation for
them in this world; and in the world to come awaits them a mighty
chastisement.”

Annihilate them in Manchester, 
on London and Westminster
Bridges!

Slay
them by committing vehicular jihad on Westminster or London Bridge, or by
stabbing them regardless of gender, or by slaughtering their children in
Manchester. Islamic behavior fits the bill completely: Muslims are racists (how
else to explain the multiple crimes against Westerners?); they are xenophobes,
even when they have invaded and settled in Western nations and expect
Westerners to conform and observe Islamic practices and Sharia law; Muslims
have an internal caste system, beginning at the top with imams and mullahs (the
“spiritual leaders”) descending to women, the lowest caste in Islamic society,
except for the occasional female spokesmen for Islam and who are just window
dressing.
Muslims
like to “know their place” and will not depart from it, but those who dare to
leave the Ummah (the larger tribal
group) are usually punished with death (honor killings), or physical maiming or
disfigurement, such as with acid attacks); Muslims are “snobbish” (we are the
superior group and all you infidels are lesser beings); the common
“ancestor.” 
And
if they do not fight Islam, slay them anyway for being indifferent to your
aspirations and the will of Allah.
.

Previous

Merkel’s Own Kool-Aid: Beer

Next

Ramadana-Ding-Dong Or, Bringing Joy to Allah

6 Comments

  1. Edward Cline

    I should note here that while many “Islamophobes” have the absolutely right position on Islam, I do not believe in “hate crime.” Muslims are notorious for hating everything not Islamic. If a Muslim commits murder or rape or robbery, he should be arraigned, convicted, and sentenced for his crime, not for what was going through his mind when he committed the crime. You can deduce why the person committed the crime, and that deduction may be used as indicative of a person’s motive, but the person’s thoughts should not be treated with the same moral or legal gravity as the actual crime. And even if you had some sort of magic X-Ray machine that could see inside a person’s mind, that, too, would be irrelevant.“Hate speech,” by the same token, is a wholly invalid concept. Because speech is an actual action, its character is irrelevant as an action taken against a person, idea, or organization, regardless of its content. It’s the action in reality that is provable and demonstrable, not the contents of a person’s mind. Throwing mental darts or daggers at something does not fall in the realm of cause-and-effect.

  2. Edward Cline

    Re mental darts or daggers, by that I meant, "dirty looks" at Muslims. Everyone should throw dirty looks at Muslims whenever they can. F***k Islam.

  3. Edward Cline

    I should add that I have never accepted the insanity plea as a legitimate means to escape justice. If a defendant could cook his own meals and drive a car and perform normal, everyday actions without killing himself, then he was sane enough to commit the crime, to engage in premeditation, to think and plot and act. “Insane” or “unstable” individuals who commit crimes ALWAYS know what they’re doing.

  4. Edward Cline

    Finally, Islam can only go “mental” because it creates a causo-connective loop: Muslims must act on their “faith” to prove themselves unswervingly devout, and prove it especially to those who would otherwise punish them. Sooner or later even their humble brood mares or baby factories must take up the knife or the steering wheel and kill unbelievers, as they have done in Israel. Islam is a homicidal rut from which there is no escape.

  5. Doug Mayfield

    "Muslims like to “know their place” and will not depart from it"

    Exactly. Islam freezes the mind and turns potentially decent human beings into robots who, if not overtly death worshiping, are intellectually, morally, and psychologically mandated toward
    placing strict obedience to Islam above life itself. (See below.)

    http://www.wnd.com/2017/06/unclean-pakistan-sewer-worker-dies-of-ramadan-non-treatment/

  6. revereridesagain

    Every person is responsible for what he chooses to believe. If you're fed nonsense about invisible gods and warlord "prophets" on magic flying horses and, as an adult, continue to believe — even though it demonstrably violates the laws of reality — because you find "comfort" in promises of favors and immortality conferred by magical beings upon believers of such tales, you cannot claim "madness" as an excuse to choose to obey their commands and slash the throats of "unbelievers" in a pub. That irreconcilable conflicts in life-threatening situations may trigger temporary psychosis does not apply in situations wherein the "conflicts" are between peaceful respect for the rights of others and murderous rampages committed for the purpose of gaining admission to a perpetual bordello in some otherworldly dimension because that's what your religion teaches. Not unless you can produce proof that you suffer from schizophrenia or some other medically verifiable mental illness not rooted in devotion to tenets of Islam shared by billions of "believers" worldwide.

    In other words, your lawyer's pitching an "insanity plea" will — or should — not wash even though thinking that running over the kuffar with a van will win you 72 recyclable sky virgins to deflower for all eternity IS NUTS. That is not "hearing voices" because your brain chem is out of whack. Some imam sold you that. You bought it. Now pay up.

    And no, that is not "hate speech", and no, "hate speech" is not a defensible legal concept.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén