Islam is Terrorist-Free

She knows who you are.

So, here’s the OIC (The
Organization of Islamic Conference
or Islamic Cooperation), but even though
every terrorist act has been committed with the sanction or encouragement of
the OIC,  Congress has failed to designate as a terrorist
organization; it refuses such a labeling. Is this a symptom of mental illness,
or the cowardly squirmies?
Pamela  Geller  has the story here.
The bill designating the OIC as a terrorist organization met defeat twice:
(It)… failed for two
terms, 2015-16, and 2017-18….
2015: (H.R.3892) The House had 69 Republicans and 2
Democrats, totaling 71, while
(S.2230) the Senate had 7 Republicans but no
Democrats; and
2017: (H.R.377) The House had 75 Republicans but no
Democrats, while
(S.68) the Senate had 4 Republicans but no
Democrats.
Did the bills get
out of committees?
2015: The House’s
Judiciary Committee voted in favor (17-10) as amended, but
no action in Senate
Judiciary’s Foreign Relations Committee; and worse,
2017: No action in
Judiciary committees of both the House or Senate.
Were there
substantive changes?
The bill (2017) deleted the findings of facts from the
bill (2015).
(1) – (7) Multiple
countries have declared the Society of the Muslim Brothers ( … “Muslim
Brotherhood”) a terrorist organization or proscribed the group from operating
in their countries: Syria; Russian Supreme Court; Egyptian court and
government; Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; Cabinet of the United Arab Emirates; and
the previous two backed by the Foreign Minister of Bahrain.
Congress? No, Congressmen and Senators would rather not alienate their Muslim
voting blocs. Besides, there is a “freedom of speech” issue, as though the OIC cared
about “freedom of speech,” which it works to ban everywhere if it criticizes Islam
(through its mouthpiece here, The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).
I’m
nuts. Every law enforcement authority says so.
Robert Spencer writes on Jihad
Watch
:
The word
“Islamophobia” is not the same as anti-Muslim bigotry, which any reasonable
person should oppose. “Islamophobia” is broader, and is analogous with Islamic
blasphemy laws. Any criticism of Islam, any attack on Islamic supremacism and
jihadist ambitions, renders one “Islamophobic.”
Wikipedia
notes that:
The first recorded
use of the term in English, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, was in 1923 in
an article in The Journal of Theological Studies.
The term entered into common usage with the publication of the Runnymede
Trust’s report in 1997. The term began to rise even more after the bombing of
September 11th. Because radical Islam was a new topic, so was the hate towards
Islam, which created the term “Islamaphobia.”Kofi Annan asserted at a
2004 conference entitled “Confronting Islamophobia” that the word
Islamophobia had to be coined in order to “take account of increasingly
widespread bigotry”.
Or, try this:
The term “Islamophobia”
was invented
and promoted in the early 1990s
by the International
Institute for Islamic Thought
(IIIT), a front group of the Muslim
Brotherhood
. Former IIIT member Abdur-Rahman Muhammad — who was with that
organization when the word was formally created, and who has since rejected
IIIT’s ideology — now reveals
the original intent behind the concept of Islamophobia: “This loathsome term is
nothing more than a thought-terminating cliché conceived in the bowels of
Muslim think tanks for the purpose of beating down critics.” In short, in its
very origins, “Islamophobia” was a term designed as
a weapon
to advance a totalitarian cause by stigmatizing critics and
silencing them….
Although the term
was coined in the early 1990s, “Islamophobia” did not become the focus of an
active Brotherhood campaign until after 9/11.
Since that time, Islamist lobby organizations (including the Council
on American-Islamic Relations
, or CAIR) and Muslim civil-rights activists have
regularly accused the American people, American institutions, law-enforcement
authorities, and the U.S. government of harboring a deep and potentially
violent prejudice against Muslims. The accusers charge that as a result of this
“Islamophobia,” Muslims are disproportionately targeted by
perpetrators of hate crimes and acts of discrimination.
Of course.  The OIC is an
affiliate of the Muslim Brotherhood.  The West, and
especially America
, it says, must be brought down by their “own
miserable hands
.” Even if we have to behead the blasphemers.
Written sometime in
1987 but not formally published until May 22, 1991, Akram’s 18-page document
listed the Brotherhood’s 29 likeminded “organizations of our friends”
that shared the common goal of dismantling American institutions and turning
the U.S. into a Muslim nation. These “friends” were identified
by Akram and the Brotherhood as groups that could help convince Muslims
“that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and
destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable
house by their hands … so that … God’s religion [Islam] is made victorious
over all other religions.”

Akram was well aware that in the U.S., it would be extremely difficult to
promote Islam by means of terror attacks. Thus the “grand jihad” that he
and his Brotherhood comrades envisioned was not a violent one involving
bombings and shootings, but rather a stealth
(or “soft”) jihad
aiming to impose Islamic
law (Sharia)
over every region of the earth by incremental,
non-confrontational means, such as working to
“expand the observant Muslim base”; to “unify] and direct Muslims’ efforts”;
and to “present Islam as a civilization alternative.” At its heart, Akram’s
document details a plan to conquer and Islamize the United States – not as
an ultimate objective, but merely as a stepping stone toward the larger goal of
one day creating “the global
Islamic state
.”

One reader, Cathy Spears, asks the obvious: why is Islam called the “religion of peace”?
 Because what Islam means by “peace” is literally death.
When Muslims no longer need to practice “fitna,” or the struggle to be faitful
to Allah, then there will be “peace.”
In 2014, I published The
Black Stone
, set in February 1930, in San Francisco, in which the hero
encounters agents of the Muslim Brotherhood, who are pursuing the New York reporter
who stole the Black Stone from the Ka’aba in Mecca. The early Brotherhood is
usually depicted as too
It isn’t his aunt’s recipe for apple strudel.
It’s a how-to formula for submission.
The OIC
is a large bloc in the UN, with multiple entities in the various departments representing
its interests. Its hands are in every conceivable committee and goal that would
busy the parasites of the U.N.: “Palestine,” family affairs, UNESCO,
science and the technology, education, and economics.  Among other things, it is invested in the suppression
of gay rights, sports, and supposedly women’s rights.
The
Organisation of Islamic Cooperation is an international organization
founded in 1969, consisting of 57 member
states
, with a collective population of over 1.6 billion as of 2008. The
organisation states that it is “the collective voice of the Muslim
world
” [the ummah]and works
to “safeguard and protect the interests of the Muslim world in the spirit
of promoting international peace and harmony”.
On 25 September
1969, an Islamic Conference, a summit of representatives of 24 Muslim majority
countries (most of the representatives being heads of state), was held in Rabat, Morocco. A
resolution was passed stating that
“Muslim
government would consult with a view to promoting among themselves close
cooperation and mutual assistance in the economic, scientific, cultural and
spiritual fields, inspired by the immortal teachings of Islam.”
Six months later in
March 1970, the First Islamic Conference of Foreign Ministers was held in Jeddah, Saudi
Arabia.[5]
In 1972, the Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC, now the Organisation
of Islamic Cooperation) was founded.
[M]any Muslims have
aspired to a pan-Islamic institution that would serve the common political,
economic, and social interests of the ummah (Muslim
community) since the 19th century. In particular, the collapse of the Ottoman
Empire
and the Caliphate after World War
I
left a vacuum.
In short, the OIC’s long-term goal is to revitalize the Caliphate with
the purpose of taking over the world via the dhimmfication of (especially with
the help of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, the
dictator of Turkey and would-be Caliph,
Western politicians, the U.N.,
and the ceaseless proselytization thru other venues, chiefly the MSM. It wishes
to criminalize “Islamophobia,” or, as Hillary Clinton once told the OIC, to “shame”
it.  It supports BDS
(boycott, divest, and sanction), or the ban of Israeli products. (Israel is its
obsession; it
cites the beginning
of the OIC on a fire in a mosque that occurred in 1969,
and automatically blamed it on the Jews.) It condemns terrorist acts, especially those
committed by Muslims, because such actions embarrass the OIC and its agenda, and
give it a “bad” press. It endorses the fantasy of a “two-state” solution to the
“Palestine” problem; that is, a means to
Indefatigable

destroy Israel.

The OIC is dedicated to making the world, and especially America,
submit to Islam and bringing “peace” to it. The Islamic brand of peace.