We all know – “we” being those who bother to read or think about it –
what “Islamophobia” is.

Geert Wilders said it
first
. Muslims are flattered.
I’ve discussed Islamophobia in dozens of columns over the years. Islamophobia
is a (morbid) fear of Islam, Muslims, about how they can reduce an advanced
nation to an Islamic pest hole (and hardly “multicultural).
It is the fear of anyone who swears unswerving allegiance to Islam, and starts
slaughtering infidels, or of anyone who blinks or submits in indifference to islam,
such as most of our politicians, and of dhimmies
(a.k.a. the dimwitted, clueless activists who believe that Islam is a “religion
of peace”), that is, of morons who carried “Refugees Welcome” signs in
virtually every Western country.
One correspondent ingeniously devised a new term, Islamo-hegemony,
which aptly describes and identifies the principal end of Islamic doctrine
and methodology (stealth jihad), which is to establish Islam as the supreme
political and religious “way of life” everywhere it turns Western gold into Islamic
lead. She also devised another apt term –
Islamo-catatonia – which is
unresponsiveness to negative information about Islam.” That is,
it is a shrug of the shoulders when reading that women have been raped and
beaten by Muslim migrants, or that another woman or girl has been “honor-killed,”
or that an infant Muslim girl has died after undergoing female genital
mutilation (FGM).
But islamophobia isn’t limited to those who know the score about the belligerent,
violent nature of Islam and want to fight it or speak out about it. It emasculates
and terrifies those who are first-hand witnesses to it, chiefly in Europe. Europeans
are rendered impotent not only by their own “Islamophobia,” but by fear of their
own governments, which have penalized any criticism of Islam with stiff fines,
prison time, or “shaming.” To be afraid of “blasphemy laws” – particularly when
they shield Muslims against legitimate or scholarly “trash talk” about them,
Allah, and Mohammad – which put freedom so speech and open discussion about Islam
at a premium. Europeans, especially Swedes and Germans, are in a catatonic
state afraid to “blaspheme” or to help victims of Muslim sexual assaults. If a
Swede or a German appeared in a public space carrying a “Refugees Not Welcome,
Go Home,” he’d be handcuffed and hauled off almost immediately. He wouldn’t
need to appear in person; the monitoring of his email account would be enough
for the state to beat him down.

The German or Swedish male, immobilized
by fear: “Gee! If I try to stop them from raping
my wife, those Muslims might kick my
head in! And then I’ll be arrested for
interfering with their culture! Or for hate speech!”
It’s frightening when a Western country, such as Canada,
seriously contemplates censorship by declaring that any utterance or print of
statements that can be declared “Islamophobic” and punishable by the
state. 
 Doubly frightening now is that two of President Trump’s
national security advisors, Lt. General McMaster and Sebastian Gorka,
advise that connecting Islam, such as in the term “Radical Islamic Terrorism,”
to terrorism is “unhelpful,” in the war against Islam, because they
claim that Islam has nothing to do with waging jihad; has been
“hijacked” by Islamic terrorists who quote the Koran chapter and
verse (clueless and literally dumbfounded George
Bush started the “hijack” meme
on 9/11) every time they slaughter people in
Allah’s name, and that the term “Radical Islamic Terrorism” won’t
ever escape McMaster’ or Gorka’s  lips
(even though Trump said it during his speech before the Joint Session of
Congress, perhaps in defiance of McMaster and Gorka). I sincerely hope Trump
gets his facts straight and shows McMaster and Gorka the door.
On March 3rd, Gatestone carried a hard-hitting column by Judith
Bergman
, “The West Submits
to Blasphemy Laws
,” in which she details just how dhimmified Western governments
have become in the face of Islam. Blaspheme laws are becoming quite ubiquitous,
even in North America.
·        
“Now
that Islamophobia has been condemned, this is not the end, but rather the
beginning…” — Muslim Brotherhood affiliate Samer Majzoub, Canadian
Muslim Forum.
·        
The motion
still does not offer any definition or any statistics to support its claim that
“Islamophobia” is a problem in Canada.
·        
However, it
should hardly shock anyone that the first motion condemning Islamophobia has so
swiftly been followed up by a new motion demanding concrete government
measures.
The West is
submitting to blasphemy laws. Denmark, for example, has apparently decided that
now is the time to invoke a dusty, old blasphemy provision. Denmark still has a
provision in the penal code against blasphemy, but until now, it has only been
used three times. The last time was nearly half a century ago, in 1971.
Denmark’s Attorney General has nevertheless just charged a man for burning a
Quran….
In
Norway, the provision against blasphemy was abolished in 2005. A poll conducted in January showed that 41% of Norwegian
Muslims believe that blasphemy should be punished, and 7% believe that the
penalty for blasphemy anywhere should be capital punishment….
In
Britain, at least one man has been prosecuted and sentenced for burning the
Quran (in 2011) and several arrested in 2010 and 2014 .
One hell of a motivational speech.
In
Canada, meanwhile, anti-Islamophobia motions, aiming gradually to prohibit all
criticism of Islam — and part of Muslim blasphemy laws — are being passed.
The Ontario Provincial Parliament unanimously passed an anti-Islamophobia motion in February.
The motion called on the legislature to “stand against all forms
of hatred, hostility, prejudice, racism and intolerance; rebuke the… growing
tide of anti-Muslim rhetoric and sentiments” and “condemn all forms
of Islamophobia.” Needless to say, no such motions were introduced to
protect Judaism or Christianity.
In
October 2016, Canada’s national Parliament unanimously passed an anti-Islamophobia motion, which was the result of a petition initiated by Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated Samer Majzoub, president of
the Canadian Muslim Forum. At the time, no one knew what they were condemning:
Criticism of Islam? Criticism of Muslims? Discussing whether ISIS is a true
manifestation of Islam? No one knew, as no one had bothered to define it.
The
lack of definition, however, has not stopped Iqra Khalid, a Member of
Parliament from the governing Liberal Party, from introducing a new motion on
the back of the previous one, Motion M-103, in the Canadian parliament. The motion
demands that “Islamophobia” not only be condemned, but that the
government develop a comprehensive approach to reducing or eliminating
Islamophobia. The motion still does not offer any definition, or any statistics
to support its claim that “Islamophobia” is a problem in Canada. However,
it should hardly shock anyone that the first motion condemning Islamophobia has
so swiftly been followed up by a new motion demanding concrete government
measures. After the first motion was unanimously passed, the man who initiated
the original petition, Samer Majzoub, had this to say in an interview
with the Canadian Muslim Forum:
“Now
that Islamophobia has been condemned, this is not the end, but rather the
beginning… We need to continue working politically and socially and with the
press. They used to doubt the existence of Islamophobia, but now we do not have
to worry about that; all blocs and political figures, represented by Canada’s
supreme legislative authority, have spoken of that existence. In the offing, we
need to get policy makers to do something, especially when it comes to the
Liberals, who have shown distinct openness regarding Muslims and all
ethnicities… All of us must work hard to maintain our peaceful, social and
humanitarian struggle so that condemnation is followed by comprehensive
policies.”

When pigs fly. And Muslims snack 
on sausage and gravy.

Quiet in the
peanut gallery, you dhimmies! European silence, and the suppression
of information
on the crime rates in Europe – crime rates ballooned
by Muslim “refugees
,”  together with
an alliance with Politically Correctness, is aiding in the transformation of
European societies into ones in which the byword among citizens is “Mum’s the
word!” Liam Deacon, in his Breitbart column, “Government
Report: Islamists Building ‘Parallel Society’ in Sweden Aided By PC Culture of
Silence
,” of March 4th, reported:

Aided by a politically correct culture of
“tolerance”, the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) is secretly building a “parallel”
society in Sweden by infiltrating organisations and political parties, a government report has concluded.
Surprisingly,
the document takes aim at “political elites” for fostering a doctrine of
multiculturalism and silence, which can help and facilitate the nefarious ends
of anti-democratic organisation like the Brotherhood….
The paper’s authors claim the Brotherhood is
working to increase the number of practicing Muslims in Sweden, encouraging
tension with Secular society, and targeting political parties, NGOs, academic
institutions and other civil society organisations.
They
also slam the “established structure of values among the country’s political
elite [which] places a high value on ‘acceptance’ and ‘tolerance’ of citizens
who are in some sense different from the mainstream”.
In
the report, the Islamism of the MB is described as a totalitarian political
ideology born out of Islam, a religion. This can make it “difficult to oppose what
on the surface appears to be (a vulnerable minority) religious rights”, it
explains.
Separate but equal “parallel” societies? Hardly. Islamo-hegemony
won’t hear of it.  Islam claims the whole
turf. No fences. No borders. No “good neighbor” policies.

Take a bus to see the Arc de Triomphe!
But be sure to wear an asbestos suit and
take a fire extinguisher.
Meanwhile, back in France,  Guy Millière reports on “France’s
Death Spiral
.”
In
1990, the “Gayssot law” was passed, stipulating that “any
discrimination based on ethnicity, nation, race or religion is
prohibited”. Since then, it has been used to criminalize any criticism of
Arab and African delinquency, any question on immigration from the Muslim
world, any negative analysis of Islam. Many writers have been fined and most
“politically incorrect” books on those topics have disappeared from
bookshops.
At the end of the 1943 movie, “This Land is Mine,” a French
school teacher instructs her
students (under duress) to tear unapproved pages from their French history
books, unapproved, that is, by the occupying Nazis. M. Millière continues.

The French government asked the media to obey the “Gayssot law.” It
also asked that history textbooks be rewritten to include chapters on the
crimes committed by the West against Muslims, and on the “essential
contribution” of Islam to humanity. All history textbooks are
“Islamically correct.”

The new “Sieg Heil” is the Islamic
“Blesssings and peace be upon you.”
Shall we call it Islamofacsism,
as well? It is, after all, a companion term to Nazism.
Basically, Islamophobia is the traumatizing, action-stifling fear of
intervening when Muslims commit rapes, murders, and just sheet nihilism against
anything Western.  Muslims would never,
as the MSM are in the habit of doing, ascribe their irrationality to “mental
illness.” However, I don’t know of any other “religion” but Islam that sanctions
mental illness as a normal state of
mind.