Saudi Arabian
investor Prince Alwaleed bin Talal
Sells used cars and
countries

 “We don’t care about facts. We ignore them.
It’s racist to cite facts. It’s our
feelings that determine what is real or relevant, not facts. What we feel is
the true reality. We have our own
truths. Oprah
said so
.” However, as many “non-#Resistance” commentators have observed,
there is no such thing as one’s “own” truth. There is just reality, or facts.
An individual doesn’t own reality, nor is it true if he does assert he that does.
To him, reality is malleable, changeable,  clay putty to be turned into anything he
wishes, because he  “doubts.” He is the
practicing icon of
Descartes’s
dictum, “I think,
therefore I am
.”  And they don’t care
if they’re called hypocrites. Labels, after all, mean nothing to these doyens.

Virginia
governor
Terry McAuliffe (D.) swore
on national TV that if he runs for President against President Trump in 2020,
he’ll hit Trump, if he stands behind him, as he did to Hillary, and
knock him down
. He also said it earlier on an independent  boast on the Virginia state site. “You’d
have to pick him up from the floor
.” However:
Under United State
Code Title 18, Section 871, it is a felony for an individual to “knowingly and
willfully” make a “threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily
harm upon the President of the United States.” The punishment for this crime is
severe, with a possible 5-year prison sentence and a fine of $250,000.
Doubtless the Secret Service would intervene immediately and cuff him
on serious charges, one of which would be assaulting the President.  Synonymous to treason. Jail time for the
pugnacious governor. McAuliffe’s madness is indicative of the rampant,
emotion-driven hatred exhibited for Trump and his supporters by him, by most
Democrats, and by the MSM.  All because his
supports helped  Trump wipe the floor and
used a broom to sweep her from presidential aspirations. McAuliffe and
#Resistance all suffer from reckless delusions of wanting to be like Rocky. But all they ever do is
float like a butterfly
but never sting like a bee. Trump seems to be immune to their snickers and
sneers.
The best way to confuse a Democrat or anyone who professes to be a Progressive
is to insist on arguments from facts. To separate his feelings from what is. He’ll refuse to do it. He’ll sputter
and look demonic and spray you with his drool.  End of argument. He’ll be so divorced from
reality you could convince him that a bar of butter is a bar of gold. Asking a
Progressive to think is like asking a turtle for the square root of 2.
Head gear  on sale at
Wal-Mart
For example, the Democrats wanted a study that would prove that illegal
gun sales were the bane of the country. But when the General Accounting Office
concluded that such sales were hard to quantify, and also because too often gun
sellers were reluctant to answer a question by a government agency, the Dems
asked for a “better” study.
Kerry Picket of the Daily
Caller
wrote January 15th:
Democratic
lawmakers don’t like the methodology that the Government Accountability Office
used to find that it’s difficult to buy firearms illegally on the internet.
The
Democrats requested the report on online gun sales, but now they seem to want a
new study to be conducted with different methodology.
“Well,
when we send something to GAO, we allow them to do the process that they think
makes sense. But we do have a disagreement with their methodology, and we’re
going to go and sit down with them and discuss how to get at the problem,”
Hawaii Democratic Sen. Brian Schatz told The Daily Caller last Thursday.
He
continued, “Our view is that it is still absolutely possible to legally
purchase guns online. The way that the GAO analysts did it is, they announced
to the sellers, ‘Hey I’d like to buy some guns illegally.’ I think the sellers
are wise enough to that to decline, so we did not agree with their methodology,
but we’ll continue to work on this issue.”
The
GAO report stated that its investigators tried to illegally purchase firearms
on both the “Surface Web” and the “Dark Web.” The investigators “revealed their
status to the sellers as individuals who would ordinarily be banned from buying
these weapons legally,” according to the report.
“Private
sellers on Surface Web gun forums and in classified ads were unwilling to sell
a firearm to our agents that self-identified as being prohibited from
possessing a firearm,” the GAO said.

An enemy of snowflake butterflies:
Cassius Marcellus Clay, Jr.
(later Muhammad Ali)
So, if sellers were unwilling to sell prohibited
guns to government agents, it warps the study in a way the Dems don’t want to
see. They’d rather the sellers sell their guns indiscriminately, to “Prove”
that gun sales are unwelcome.
Of
the 72 attempts agents made to purchase firearms on the Surface Web, 56 sellers
refused to complete a transaction once we revealed that either the shipping
address was across state lines or that we were prohibited by law from owning
firearms.”
In
the other cases, the investigators’ website was frozen or they encountered
suspected scammers.
Ultimately, the GAO
is “not making recommendations in this report.”
To the Dems, the conclusions were unwelcome. The reported facts did not
fit into their ideal conclusion. They’d rather see a fairy land of guns salting
the country in private hands and deserving of regulation (or more regulations).
Reality is unacceptable to them. When Obama’s Attorney General, Eric Holder,
rigged “Fast
& Furious
,” there were no such complaints or whining. Holder eventually
was revealed as the shyster he is, to help advance Obama’s crusade to disarm
all those “gun clingers” Obama demonized.
There has always been a question of how Barack Obama attended Harvard
and how well or badly he did there. Many of his personal records are still
sealed, including his academic records.  In
September 2008 Ken
Timmerman
asks the question.
How exactly did
Barack Obama pay for his Harvard Law School education?
The way the Obama
campaign has answered the question was simply hard work and student loans.
But new questions
have been raised about Obama’s student loans and Obama’s ties to a radical
Muslim activist who reportedly was raising money for Obama’s Harvard studies
during the years 1988 to 1991.
The allegations
first surfaced in late March, when former Manhattan Borough president Percy Sutton told a New
York cable channel that a former business partner who was “raising money” for
Obama had approached him in 1988 to help Obama get into Harvard Law School.
In the interview,
Sutton says he first heard of Obama about twenty years ago from Kalid
Al-Mansour, (not the Saudi soccer player) a Black Muslim and Black Nationalist
who was a “mentor” to the founders of the Black Panther party at the time the
party was founded in the early 1960s.
Sutton described
al-Mansour as advisor to “one of the world’s richest men,” Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin
Talal
.
Timmerman’s article winds up at a dead end, because Percy Sutton’s
relatives denied he ever said that Mansour had anything to do with Obama, even
though Sutton said Obama knew Mansour in an interview.  But the video connection between Sutton and
Mansour and then to Obama must be archived somewhere.
Prince
Alwaleed catapulted to fame in the United States after the September 11
attacks, when New York mayor Rudy Guiliani refused his $10 million check to
help rebuild Manhattan, because the Saudi prince hinted publicly that America’s
pro-Israel policies were to blame for the attacks.
Sutton
knew Al-Mansour well, since the two men had been business partners and served
on several corporate boards together.
As
Sutton remembered, Al-Mansour was raising money for Obama’s education and
seeking recommendations for him to attend Harvard Law School.
Whether or not Talal was a secret funder of Obama’s Harvard years is an
open question. It is very possible he was Obama’s Harvard “sugar daddy.” It still
remains a subject of speculation. Though, given
Talal’s investments
and holdings, he is too likely a candidate. Pittance
like the cost of Harvard Law School tuition would be small drop in the bucket
to someone like Talal, practically invisible, but Occidental College in California and Harvard
would conform to the Muslim Brotherhood’s goal of conquering America by stealth
and by blatant political action by an “Islamic Candidate.”

would be a good, long-term investment
in the political grooming of a man who wished to “transform” America and
subject it to the whims and demands of Islam. Funding Obama’s education at

High-profile Saudi
Arabian investor Prince Alwaleed bin Talal owns chunks of private and public
companies in the U.S., Europe and the Middle East through Kingdom Holding Co.,
5% of which is listed on the Saudi Stock Exchange (he is listed as owning the
other 95%). Holdings include stakes in the ride-sharing firm Lyft, social media
firm Twitter, Citigroup, hotel management company Four Seasons Hotels &
Resorts, the swanky Hotel George V in Paris and the Savoy Hotel in London.
Will Never Give In
Reports of Islamic attacks come to this site daily. It is especially discouraging
to read about what is happening in Germany and England (https://mail.google.com/mail/#inbox/160fe3bdb148d970
and from https://mail.google.com/mail/#inbox/160fdb8e65a28d1c). How to fight
the Islamic Swamp and its clueless Lefty allies? Write. Use that freedom to
oppose and fight the “inevitable.” Never submit.  Never
give in
.