I can’t say enough about
Pamela Geller’s FATWA:
HUNTED IN AMERICA, previously reviewed on
Rule of Reason (Pamela
Geller: Wonder Woman of the Counter-Jihad). I could pen a column for each
chapter in the book, and it still wouldn’t do it justice. Geller is an
Amazonian warrior without equal, at least in our time.
warrior in her time (1905-1982), and endured and survived the same level of smearing,
defaming, and character assassinations at the hands of the MSM as Geller has
and continues to endure now. Rand was opposed to Communism and alerted Americans
to the insidious and stealthy campaign to insinuate the ideology into the
culture, especially by academics and Hollywood. She was hated because of her
opposition to any brand of collectivism and for her willingness to expose the sneaksbies.
Islam was not an overriding concern to her or to just about everyone else in
demonstrated how Islam is being insinuated into American politics and culture, and how it should be fought, and not merely
indefatigable warrior of the mind. Geller is a warrior of the mind, as well. She
insists that it is the ideology of Islam that must be repudiated, defeated, and
extinguished. It is not just its uncounted instances of barbarism over the
centuries and its totalitarian nature that must be exposed and opposed. For
more people to grasp the death-worshipping nature of Islam, it must be addressed
as an ideology. Nothing but a preemptive intellectual strike against Islam will
disintegrate it as a “moral” system. Islam, like the Left, has no moral
argument in its defense. It cannot call on the truth about itself without
implicating itself. Geller is leading that strike.
comes at you with a gun, you answer with force. If he is out to destroy you,
you owe it to yourself to defend yourself. We need to understand that the left
is as dangerous, if not more so, than the suicide bomber, for obscuring this
basic fact. Because leftists have the legitimacy of the mainstream, the imprimatur
of respectability, they wield this spurious legitimacy like a club to destroy
all opposition to their totalitarian agenda. (p. 226, FATWA)
and enemies on the Left are like the Komodo Dragons of Indonesia. These
prehistoric creatures are content to merely bite a victim, and inject a
bacterial poison into it. They will wait until the victim dies from the poison
or is helplessly paralyzed by it before consuming it. So it is with the Left
and Islam. That is how the Left and the so-called “religion of peace” have
worked. The First Amendment has been bitten, and it is dying. The Islamic Komodo
Dragons are drooling.
|Security at the Draw Mohammad Garland event|
Quoting from my
first review of FATWA:
wish to think about the essence of Islam, but would rather cowardly slink
behind George Bush’s mantra that Islam
is “a religion of peace,” Geller has a prophetic warning:
consequences of avoiding reality” (p. 87).
keep piling up the bodies and victims in jihadist attacks inspired
by Islam, almost weekly.
will sooner or later come after the smaller ones. Journalism has been bitten.
It is practically dead.
Project on Terrorism (IPT) reported a 1991 document of the Muslim Brotherhood,
Memorandum,” that explains Islam’s methods and goals of conquest:
process of settlement is a “Civilization-Jihadist Process” with all
the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind
of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from
within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the
hands of the believers…
Emerson of IPT prefaced that startling revelation of strategy with:
a.k.a. Mohamed Adlouni, for the Shura Council of the Muslim Brotherhood. In the
introductory letter, Akram referenced a “long-term plan…approved and
adopted” by the Shura Council in 1987 and proposed this memo as a
supplement to that plan and requested that the memo be added to the agenda for
an upcoming Council meeting. Appended to the document is a list of all Muslim
Brotherhood organizations in North America as of 1991.
Memorandum in FATWA. The MSM is the palsied (such as the New York Times), “miserable”
hand that is aiding the enemy in its quest to destroy Western civilization.
later come to understand the evil of the left and its dogma of superiority of feelings
over reason…It was not until years later that I understood that the left was as
big a problem, perhaps bigger, than the jihad. For the left was all about control,
which is why they are aligned with the jihad forces. There is no better system
of control than Sharia.
It is the eternal struggle of mankind. Individualism versus collectivism. The state
versus the individual. The left despises the individual, which is why they are
so deeply at odds with America, why they stand with Islamic supremacists. There
is no unique soul under Islam, no “individual.” America, on the other hand, was
the first moral government in history to be based on individual rights (p. 15
of the defenders of the freedom of speech is nothing new. It began shortly
after the American Revolution and soon after the Constitution was ratified in
1788 (by the 9th state, New Hampshire, meeting the 2/3rds requirement), when
President John Adams signed the Alien and Sedition Acts in 1798. From my September
2016 column, “Hate
Speech: Then and Now”:
late-1790s has reverse parallels today. Where the Mainstream Media (MSM) today,
by its own admission, intervened to slander, libel, and smear presidential
candidate Donald Trump (now the President-Elect), to aid in and guarantee the
election of a criminally irresponsible, scandal-rich, unstable Hillary Clinton,
the Democratic candidate, the writers and newspapers of the 18th century came
under vicious attack from the government and the Federalists, the party of John
Adams, who as President signed the Alien and Sedition
Acts passed by Congress. The MSM failed ingloriously in its efforts. But
Adams, who was the main target of criticism by “Republican” (the name of the
early Democratic Party) writers and newspapers, unleashed the dogs of
censorship on them when he
signed the Alien and Sedition Acts on June 18th, 1798.
could call the 18th century equivalent of “hate speech.” It was impermissible
and punishable now to hate President John Adams (the second President after
George Washington) and the Federalists and their national and foreign policies,
and to voice one’s anathema for them in print or vocally. Those who did so and
drew the attention of large numbers of people, were arrested and jailed. Adams
and the Federalists would not otherwise have heard or read the dissatisfaction
but for informers who reported the transgressions to Adams and his political
Sedition Act may sound familiar to you. Google, Facebook, and YouTube are the
heirs and practitioners of this brand of censorship:
utter or publish, or shall cause or procure to
be written, printed, uttered or published, or shall knowingly and willingly
assist or aid in writing, printing, uttering or publishing any false,
scandalous and malicious writing or writings against the government of the
United States, or either house of the Congress of the United States, or the
President of the United States, with intent to defame the said government, or
either house of the said Congress, or the said President, or to bring them, or
either of them, into contempt or disrepute; or to excite against them,
or either or any of them, the hatred of the good people of the United States….
the “government of the United States,” Congress, or the President, and you will
get the point. In this instance, it was the government suppressing any
criticism of itself by criminalizing words printed in what was then a free and raucous
press. Writers and editors were arrested for having printed, written, or spoken
those words; they were tried, and served time in prison. By the time Adams left
office in 180 to make way for Thomas Jefferson, only two of those victims languishing
in jail were the sole survivors of the persecution, out of possibly dozens.
Jefferson immediately pardoned them.
that new “free press,” not the government (not yet), that has become the judge
and jury of any anyone speaking out against Islam, for holding it in contempt,
disrepute, or ridicule, and for inciting “hatred” for it in people (“Islamophobia,”
bigotry, and racism, even though Islam is not a race and has follower and
converts from every ethnic group), and feels free to defame and denigrate anyone
who speaks the truth about Islam. Our “free press” has become a tool of a
totalitarian ideology that tolerates no criticism (as the Nazis did not), and so
is no longer “free.” If Islam will not tolerate the freedom of speech, neither
will the MSM. The MSM has become the despised “running dog” of Islam. And we
know that, at its core, Islam
and Muslims hate dogs.
lapdogs have created narratives out of whole cloth about the impending violence
from the right…(p. 222, FATWA).
in the U.S. against Muslims that never happened or ever happens after a
particularly vicious and bloody jihadist attack, e.g. 9/11, Orlando, Boston,
New York) is a violence that the left hopes will happen so it can argue for
more gun control, and speech controls. I can only say that this species of
malevolent hope of the MSM is evidence of a sociopath. But when the violence
occurs, it is usually the work of jihadists, and when the MSM is forced to
concede it, the jihadists are excused because of “mental illness” or imaginary
persecution or discrimination. Or they are “excusably” provoked by the actions
and words of Geller and other “right-wingers).
violence, no matter how nonexistent the ties. Even when I was the target of an
assassination plot in Garland [with some FBI connivance], the left blamed me because
I would not adhere to the blasphemy laws under Sharia (p. 223; brackets mine;
Geller discusses the FBI’s connivance in Chapter X: “Garland, Texas: ISIS
Attacks the Homeland”).
not bend to Sharia. And never will. So she had to die.
asserts that Geller “provoked” the jihadists by exercising her right to speak
freely and to display a gallery of Mohammad images. Speakers and writers of the
truth are today accused of “hate speech,” when in fact it is the MSM and Islam that
indulge freely in “hate speech.”
aside from being a prolific writer (Can’t
We Talk About This?), and a tireless champion of the freedom of speech. In FATWA:
HUNTED IN AMERICA she details her fight against knock-kneed transportation
authorities to get her many ads put on buses and in subway
|Winner of the Draw Mohammad Garland event|
stations. One of her
billboards is prominently displayed in Times Square. She an advocate of the
victims of Muslim honor-killings, and a public speaker when she is allowed to
speak and even allowed to appear anywhere. Almost single-handedly, she defeated
plans to erect the Ground
Zero Mosque. She is a founder, with Robert Spencer,
and a prime mover behind the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI) and Stop
Islamization of America (SIOA). The Wikipedia entries on Geller, Spencer, and
the AFDI are prime examples of the lop-sided kinds of pro-Islam “journalism”
that is the norm today.
the MSM go to sleep, they first check their closets or look under their beds
for the boogeyman jihadists of Islam they fear will behead them. But all they
find is stern-eyed,