The Official Blog Of Edward Cline

Magna Carta In the Dustbin

Prime Minister Theresa May has said “phooey” on the Magna Carta and
British liberties and ordered the arrest of Tommy Robinson on a specious charge
of “disturbing the peace.” He was live streaming a report on the trial of a group
of Muslim “groomer” rapists outside a Leeds courthouse, out of earshot of the judge,
the defendants, lawyers and jurors – technically not even on the courthouse
property – when a bevy of policemen swooped in and arrested him.

knights of the Crescent Table at work

On Friday, Robinson was live-streaming
(from his telephone) outside Leeds Crown Court where last week’s Grooming Gang
of the Week were on trial for “grooming” – the useless euphemism for
industrial-scale child gang rape and sex slavery by large numbers of Muslim men
with the active connivance (as I pointed out to the Sky guys) of every organ of
the state: social workers, police, politicians. Oh, and also the media….
Robinson, a journalist for Rebel Media, was
arrested, detained, taken to another courthouse, judged, sentenced, and taken
to Hull Prison, all within a matter of minutes. Not only that, but the judge
who sentenced him to  thirteen months in
prison, decreed a blanket
news blackout
on his arrest and also on the trial of the grooming gang.
Newspapers and their Internet sites that had reported the body-snatching were
obliged to “scrub” their stories, under penalty of law if they did not.
Robinson was
taken with the governmentjudicial tool of a “bill of
which one legal site site defines as:
Definition: A legislative act that
singles out an individual or group for punishment without a trial.
special legislative enactment that imposes a death sentence without a judicial trial
upon a particular person or class of persons suspected of committing serious offenses,
such as
or a felony.
A bill of attainder
is prohibited by Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 of the Constitution because it deprives
the person or persons singled out for punishment of the safeguards of a trial
by jury.
A bill of
attainder does not necessarily entail a death sentence.  In Robinson’s case, it just means “disappearing”
from public sight, as dissidents did in Argentina and Chile in the last century.
Steyn wrote:
So on Friday
he was outside the Crown Court in Leeds. He was not demonstrating, or accosting
or chanting, or much speaking. He was just pointing his mobile phone upon the
scene from a distance. Within minutes, seven coppers showed up in whatever they
use instead of a Black Maria these days, tossed him inside it and drove off. In
other words, these were not “investigating officers” called to the
scene: They showed up with the intent to take him away. Within hours, he was
tried, convicted and gaoled – at HM Prison Hull, a Category B chokey, or one
level below maximum security. The judge in the case, one Geoffrey Marson, spent
all of four minutes on trying, convicting and sentencing Robinson. It is not
clear whether that leisurely tribunal included his order expressly forbidding
report on these proceedings
” (the case is Regina vs Yaxley-Lennon
because that’s Robinson’s real name).
Robinson’s “trial”
was more like a military “drum head
trial than a civilian trial. Frankly, the prohibition of all news about his
arrest does not even constitute a “D-notice,”
but rather a plain case of classic railroading to get rid of someone likely to
shed light on the forty years of Muslim grooming and the Shania enslaving of
British girls and children in a vast prostitution ring about which the government
had done little or nothing.  
This is why
Britain needs a Constitution like our own, complete with a First Amendment and
with a prohibition of bills of attainder. Robinson was initially charged with “disturbing
the peace.” However, the street on which Robinson was pacing outside the
courthouse was virtually empty; it was indeed, empty and peaceful, until the
cops showed up. No noisy mob of Muslims was there demonstrating and threatening
to kill or injure him or any passersby. There weren’t even any supporters
cheering him on.
What part of
the Magna Carta does Theresa May snort at while clutching to power as she sells
out Britain and Brexit? There are two clauses in it which May has put in her personal
memory hole
(38) In future no official shall place
a man on trial upon his own unsupported statement, without producing credible
witnesses to the truth of it.
(39) No free man shall be seized or
imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or
deprived of his standing in any way, nor will we proceed with force against
him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by
the law of the land.
This is not
what Robinson was afforded.
The Magna
Carta over the centuries produced Parliament (from the 25 Barons who
arm-twisted King John into signing it) and common law. There is a lot in the
document that concerns the issues of his time and which are completely foreign
to modern minds.
And so May
has just snapped her fingers at the principles. Doubtless all the civil servants,
corrupt police and social “servants” in her train have applauded her and
breathed sighs of relief.


Perfidious Albion


The Islamic Prime Directive


  1. Teresa

    This is the saddest thing that has happened to England in my lifetime. That and the disturbed mentalities that made the incident possible. The king is dead and may this parliament die with him.

  2. Justin O Smith

    The arrest of British free speech activist Tommy Robinson has sent shockwaves across the Anglosphere. The United Kingdom, once dedicated to the values of freedom, has taken a path toward authoritarian government and away from freedom. The once great nation, which created the Magna Carta and once commanded an empire, is now the land of tyranny. Unless the British people love their freedom enough and fight this injustice in fierce fashion, it will remain a land silenced by intimidation and fear.

    The authoritarian socialist government of the United Kingdom has been out to get Robinson for years on anything it can. It has harassed, intimidated, arrested, and incarcerated Robinson, as it did last May, since it is now apparently a "crime" to report on the decades-long systematic rape of hundreds of non-Muslim children by gangs of Muslim men, who are now apparently a protected class of people. Lizzie Dearden of the Independent reported that Robinson was arrested for "breaching the peace," no doubt an absurd pretense by the British authorities in light of the documented film footage of his actions.

    Read more:
    Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

  3. Justin O Smith

    If gangs of white men had spent decades torturing and raping little Muslim girls and a justly outraged Muslim reporter were covering the case, in a similar manner as Robinson, would he be arrested?

    We all know that the answer is "no," and we know why. The U.K. is so invested in its politically correct multiculturalism diversity project that it has applied a different treatment of Muslims under the law, which accepts the diversity of legal systems and places the country on a path toward ruin.

    Diversity of treatment under the law fragments societies. Diversity in this sense cannot ever work unless moral values remain constant. If freedom of speech is a value and a virtue, can any free nation really tolerate the intolerant and those who violently oppose freedom of speech?

    Read more:
    Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

  4. Justin O Smith

    As we all know, there has been no press conference or detailed explanation of Robinson's arrest from the British government, which further illuminates the illegitimacy of this action. Instead of transparency, the government banned any reports on the trial of the Muslim pedophiles and the arrest and incarceration of Tommy Robinson. Not only were reporters' questions going unanswered, but the reporters were forbidden from even reporting the bare facts of Robinson's incarceration.

    On May 26, Gerald Batten, a UKIP member of the European Parliament, tweeted: "I am trying to recall of a case where someone was convicted of a 'crime' which cannot be reported on. Where he can be cast into prison without it being possible to report his name, offense, or place of imprisonment for fear of contempt of court. Can anyone remember such a case?"

    This only infuriated journalists across the Atlantic. Judi McLeod, editor of the Canada Free Press, opened her article by asking, "Where is Tommy Robinson? A question whose answer should be demanded rather than merely asked[.] … Modern day Merry England has become far more nightmare than fairytale, as it steadily works its way toward ugly police state status."

    What's next, England – people getting "disappeared"?

    Free speech is dead in the United Kingdom. The imprisonment of Tommy Robinson and the arbitrary silencing of the press prove it.

    In a land that once could proudly state, "The sun never sets on the British Empire," the torch of freedom has been extinguished. It's a land divided by diversity that has now descended into the darkness of tyranny.

    If the globalists in both American parties and the U.S. State Department have their way, America will be next.

    Tommy Robinson represents a large segment of Britain's people, with over 500,000 signatures on a petition already to "Free Tommy." The people sent a clear message on Saturday, May 26, 2018, that they have had enough, as thousands of British people stopped traffic, chanted, and pressed the gates of 10 Downing Street and threw bottles at machine gun-toting policemen. Their anger hung thick in the air, because they want Robinson, at the very least, to be released from prison and allowed to get back to his life and enjoy the same protection and human rights and dignity as Anjem Choudary, the terrorist-supporter, was afforded by the authorities. Short of this, the summer in Britain will turn out to be a season of riots and civil strife, awaiting the spark that moves the good and decent Brits – of a long ancestry dating to 1066 and William the Conqueror – to fight furiously to make their land free once more.

    Read more:
    Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén