What causes migrants from Africa and the Mideast to go on rape sprees of European, Caucasian women? Is it race or the fact that Europe is so superior to Africa and the Mideast that rape compensates for the obvious inferiority of Africa? A rape compensates for hailing from a backward, primitive culture. Or is it pure hatred? It represents a conquest of the better by the inferior.

According to Bare Naked Islam (cited above):

Elin Krantz was repeatedly raped even when she was dead from the attack, and her corpse buried under rocks in a forest. Alllah commands that white, European women be brutalized in the name of Allah. Robert Spencer wrote on Jihad Watch:

Infidel girls and their use as sex slaves is sanctioned in the Qur’an. According to Islamic law, Muslim men can take “captives of the right hand” (Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 33:50). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful unto thee thy wives unto whom thou hast paid their dowries, and those whom thy right hand possesseth of those whom Allah hath given thee as spoils of war” (33:50). 4:3 and 4:24 extend this privilege to Muslim men in general. The Qur’an says that a man may have sex with his wives and with these slave girls: “The believers must (eventually) win through, those who humble themselves in their prayers; who avoid vain talk; who are active in deeds of charity; who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or (the captives) whom their right hands possess, for (in their case) they are free from blame.” (Qur’an 23:1-6)
The rape of captive women is also sanctioned in Islamic tradition. Victims of rape have reported that their attackers often prayed to Allah while or before committing the crime. As Robert Spencer, an authority on Islam; noted above on Jihad Watch.

There is the scandal of Rotherham, of a decades old crime wave (and not just in Rotherham) The experiences of Emma Jackson (a pseudonym), a long-term victim of one “grooming” gang, are revealed in this Guardian report of the jailing and sentencing of one of many gangs, which operate with impunity because of the Crown’s fear of being called racist, even though most of the ‘groomers” are of Pakistani origin, and even though most of their victims have been white. Are the “groomers’ racist? I would say, Yes, given the ethniticity of the victims and the common ethniticity of the criminals, Pakistani.

But what of Somanis, Nigerians, Eritreans, the Congolese?  And blacks of other African nations? And especially if they are Muslims? Is there penchant in them for the rape of  Caucasian-European women based on race? Given the races of both parties, I would say, Yes. One never reads of the rape of black women anywhere, and infrequently of the rape of Hindu or Indian women and girls in Britain. 

As Robert Spender has explained, the rapes are part and parcel of the Islamic imperative to conquer the West by humiliating its women. Mohammed was notorious for raping captive women. Ibn Kammuna goes into detail on the subject in Islam Watch:

Many critics accuse Muhammad of being a
rapist by citing certain sex incidents of his from the hadiths and Sira, but
Muslims reject such accusations by claiming that those incidents do not qualify
to be rape. In this article, I discuss the issue of Prophet Muhammad being a
rapist. To keep the article brief, I will cite the cases of three women whom
Muhammad had captured and used for sex.
I do invite the reader to look objectively
at the evidence before calling me a “bigot”, “Islamophobe”, or any other imagined
attributes that Muslims give to anyone who criticizes Islam or show Muhammad in
a bad light.
This work is divided into the following
1.    Definition of a
2.    Existing evidence
about Muhammad’s rapes
3.    Bani Al Mustaliq
raid and Juwairiyyah – Who was Juwairiyyah?
4.    Safiyah of
5.    Rayhana of Bani
6.    Conclusion
7.    Supplementary
1. Definition of a Rapist

Varieties of dictionary definitions of rape
make one theme obvious: A rapist is someone who forces another person to have
sexual intercourse. Rape is the crime of forcing another person to submit to
sexual intercourse. To force (another person) to submit to sex acts, especially
sexual intercourse, amounts to committing rape.

Bare Naked Islam carries the whole story above. Most of the stories of rape are too gruesome to dwell on. And because of the “cultural” differences between the West and Africa, rape is a certainty, borne by envy and hatred of the West, and a strong, overriding element of racism. You must wonder what was the fate of Western women during the Hun invasion of Europe. Rome was spared  But the West is being subjected to another Hunnic invasion, from Africa and from the Mideast, at the behest of Western governments too cowardly to defend themselves or their citizens.

Recep Tayyip Erdoğan  of
Turkey wishes to unleash on Europe countless more Muslim ‘immigrants.”  He is the new Attilla. He wishes to further subdue Europe to mass rape and murder and crime. He wants it to submit to barbarism, and to cry “Uncle.” Most Western governments are only too wiling to say it. They’re only too ready to cringe at the charge of racism.

Robert Spencer wrote:

The Qur’an teaches that
Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man
to take “captives of the right hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30). The
Qur’an says: “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of
the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is
more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah
Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women do not
cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and
that such abuse would be justified,”

Degrade, humiliate, mutilate,  and murder the white “slags” so that you may move closer to Allah, the Koran commands, And Africans and Mideast Muslims are entirely receptive to the decree. It isn’t a “racial” matter? Rather it’s an issue of hating the good for being the good.