The Official Blog Of Edward Cline

Refugees À-Go-Go

Barack Obama has not said it so openly. He relies on his allies in malice to
enunciate it. If there is any “negative” reaction to such racism, then it would
redound on his proxies, not on him. But, Hillary agrees and wants to continue
his policy. America’s “white” population electorate must not only be
disenfranchised or rendered null with a massive influx of Muslim “refugees,”
and also with South American illegals, all of whom will suddenly and magically be
endowed
with the vote
, but, if

For eight years, guilty of malice aforethought


possible, be “replaced” with the preferred races and
rendered a powerless, unrepresented “minority.”

This was Ted Kennedy’s
fondest legislative dream. In 1995, the Center for Immigration
Studies
opined on the consequences of the The
Hart-Celler Act of 1965
:
The unexpected result has been
one of the greatest waves of immigration in the nation’s history — more than 18
million legal immigrants since the law’s passage, over triple the number
admitted during the previous 30 years, as well as uncountable millions of
illegal immigrants. And the new immigrants are more likely to stay (rather than
return home after a time) than those who came around the turn of the century.
Moreover, this new, enlarged immigration flow came from countries in Asia and
Latin America which heretofore had sent few of their sons and daughters to the
United States. And finally, although the average level of education of
immigrants has increased somewhat over the past 30 years, the negative gap
between their education and that of native-born Americans has increased
significantly, creating a mismatch between newcomers and the needs of a modern,
high-tech economy…..
The liberalization
of immigration policy reflected in the 1965 legislation can be understood as
part of the evolutionary trend in federal policy after World War II to end
legal discrimination based on race and ethnicity — essentially, the immigration
bill was mainly seen as an extension of the civil rights movement,
and a
symbolic one at that, expected to bring few changes in its wake. [Bolding the
report’s]
And, there were a number of noteworthy 
foot-in-mouth predictions, this one  by Rep. Emanuel Celler (D-NY), a sponsor of
the bill:
“With the end
of discrimination due to place of birth, there will be shifts in countries
other than those of northern and western Europe. Immigrants from Asia and
Africa will have to compete and qualify in order to get in, quantitatively and
qualitatively, which, itself will hold the numbers down. There will not be,
comparatively, many Asians or Africans entering this country. .. .Since the
people of Africa and Asia have very few relatives here, comparatively few could
immigrate [sic] from those countries
because they have no family ties in the U.S.” (Congressional Record, Aug.
25, 1965, p. 21812.)
Ted Kennedy wants you to disappear.

Ted Kennedy then assures
everyone that there won’t be deleterious consequences of the new immigration
bill. But, being a Kennedy, he could not help but lie:

Senate immigration subcommittee
chairman Edward Kennedy (D-MA.) reassured his colleagues and the nation with
the following:
“First, our cities will not
be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the
present level of immigration remains substantially the same … Secondly, the
ethnic mix of this country will not be upset … Contrary to the charges in
some quarters, [the bill] will not inundate America with immigrants from any
one country or area, or the most populated and deprived nations of Africa and
Asia … In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the
proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to
think.”
Sen. Kennedy concluded by saying,
“The bill will not flood
our cities with immigrants. It will not upset the ethnic mix of our society. It
will not relax the standards of admission. It will not cause American workers
to lose their jobs.” (U.S. Senate, Subcommittee on Immigration and Naturalization
of the Committee on the Judiciary, Washington, D.C., Feb. 10, 1965. pp. 1-3.)
In 1965, there
was no ISIS, Muslims were all but invisible, and so were Mexican and South
American illegals, and Syria and Iraq may as well have been on the moon. But,
knowing how little Kennedy valued any truth, one cannot but imagine that he was
hoping for the worst: he, too, wanted to destroy America. He got what he wished
for, in the person and policies of Barack Obama.
Now, if we have
admitted thousands of Syrian “refugees”-cum-“immigrants,” and among them is a
high proportion of passive Islamic supremacists, and another proportion of ISIS
infiltrators posing as put-upon sufferers of wartime hardship, what does this
bode for the country?
Well, the French
may not have the knack for keeping out terrorists, but they have grasped a bit
of the problem and have provided us with a foreshadowing of things to come in
this country. Bruce Cornibe in his Counter Jihad article of October 11th, “French
Terrorism Watch List Overflowing with 15,000 Potential Jihadists,
” writes:
Terror
watch lists help track potential terrorists, but they are only as good as the
validity of the indicators to get on the list, the intelligence on the
suspects, the manpower to monitor the highest threats, and the aggressiveness
of law enforcement to step in before the radicals act upon their desires.
France’s terror watch
list
with its 15,000
individuals gives insight into the extent of how radical Islam is plaguing one
of Europe’s largest countries. The UK’s Express provides some details about the
list and some of its failures stating:
French
authorities began tracking people on a database in March of 2015 following the
Charlie Hebdo attacks and shootings at a kosher market in January of that year
that killed 17 people.
However
that did not prevent the subsequent co-ordinated attacks in Paris in November
of last year which killed 130 or the horrifying slaughter of 86 people at the
Bastille Day celebrations in Nice in July.
There have
been a total of 21 terror attacks across the country since December 2014
sparking widespread anger and a backlash against French president Francois
Hollande.
Now Special
Forces are said to believe that at least 4,000 of these individuals pose a
significant threat to society and are being tracked on a daily basis by the
Directorate of Internal Security.
The majority of the people being
watched are men aged between 18 and 25 and are said to be “psychologically
confused.”
Psychologically confused?? Among other ill-effects of Islam, it can also be responsible
for dementia.
Just as Angela
Merkel wants to see indigenous Germans replaced with what she must imagine will
be a mongrel hybrid of Germans, Middle Easterners, and North Africans (provided
enough German women are raped and impregnated by migrants and denied by the new
fascist German state the right to an abortion). This is the “social justice” of
our warrior “elites.” It is pure undisguised racism.
The Germans have
a “final solution” to the problem of Muslim migrant depredations: Fuse Islamic
ideology with what is left of Western liberalism. Finance Minister Wolfgang
Schaeuble has proposed introducing a “German Islam.” Reuters reported on
October 2nd, in “Germany’s
finance minister presses for a ‘German Islam
‘”:
A veteran ally of Angela Merkel
urged Muslims in Germany on Sunday to develop a “German Islam” based
on liberalism and tolerance, saying the influx of people seeking refuge, many
of them Muslims, is a challenge for mainstream society.
Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble,
stepping out of his usual finance remit, urged tolerance, saying the arrival of
hundreds of thousands of migrants required a better understanding among Germans
of what is important to them and how they want to live.
The arrival of large numbers of
refugees has strained communities and led to a rise in far-right violence and
attacks on migrant shelters, particularly in eastern Germany.
Schaeuble, a stalwart of
Merkel’s Christian Democrats (CDU), said: “Without a doubt, the growing
number of Muslims in our country today is a challenge for the open-mindedness
of mainstream society.”
In a guest article for
conservative paper Welt am Sonntag, he added: “The origin of the majority
of refugees means that we will be increasingly dealing with people from quite
different cultural circles than previously.”
He acknowledged that sexual
attacks by migrants in Cologne and two attacks by migrants claimed by the
Islamic State militant group over the summer had soured the mood.  “We should not, in this more tense
situation, allow an atmosphere to emerge in which well-integrated people in
Germany feel alien,” he said.
Despite the rising number of
xenophobic attacks in Germany, Schaeuble said he believed the majority of
Germans would say: “Yes, we want you to belong to us.”
Perhaps Schaeuble
is blind or tone deaf, but he seems to be oblivious to a growing number of
Germans who are shouting and demonstrating: “No! We do not want you to belong to us!” Because they know that, in the end,
they will belong to the Muslims. Western values and Islamic values are
irreconcilable.

“Timmy” Kaine (I
call him “Timmy” to indicate his intellectual age), Hillary Clinton’s
vice-presidential candidate, is one of the most voluble and vicious Democratic
racists. He wouldn’t say what he says below unless Hillary and her staff had
first vetted it. “I’m Hillary Clinton, I approved this doofuss’s message.”  Infowars
reported:

“I’ve never been treated badly
in life because of my skin color or my gender,” Kaine told a group of black
Baptists in New Orleans. “I think the burden is on those of us who are in the
majority — Caucasians. We have to put ourselves in a place where we are the
minority.”
The “burden” that Kaine mentions
obviously means taking on “white guilt,” despite the fact that – even at the
height of slavery – only 1.4% of whites in America owned slaves. White people
were also victims of far more brutal and longer lasting oppression under the
Barbary slave trade.
Kaine’s desire to see whites
become a minority in America is set
to be realized in around 30 years
because white people are the only group
with a higher death rate than birth rate.
Hispanics are growing in number
at a pace of around 2.1 percent a year, with blacks growing at 1.3 percent, while
whites are only growing at 0.5 percent.
Ann  Moreno on Truthfeed also reported Kaine’s moronic
meanderings in “Tim
Kaine Admits Hillary Plans to “Stick it to White People” Says ‘Whites Need to
Submit’
”:
In what can only be
called a colossal Freudian
slip
, Hillary’s VP nominee admitted on Thursday that
Democratic policies are harmful to white Americans.
Kaine was speaking to a group of
black Baptists in New Orleans when he suggested that in order to have “equity”
between the races, white people must submit themselves to a state of
repression similar to what black Americans have experienced.
Essentially, what Kaine is saying,
is that he and Hillary want to turn White Americans into the minority race.
…and her policies will do that,
according to him.

Vice President
Joe Biden, the Obama administration’s resident “scary
clown
” also had to flap his gums on the subject of erasing “white supremacy.”
Breitbart reported  in June 2015 in “Joe
Biden: ‘A Good Thing’ When Whites ‘Absolute Minority’ in 2017 (Census Bureau
Projects Majority-Minority Nation in 2044)
:

On Tuesday, Vice
President Joe Biden said it will be a “good thing” when whites are an “absolute
minority” in America in 2017…..
“By 2017, those of
us of European stock will be an absolute minority in the United States of
America,” Biden said at a State Department luncheon for Brazilian President
Dilma Rousseff. According to pool reports, Biden added that that’s “not a bad
thing, that’s a good thing” because it means the country is becoming more
diverse….
Biden
is reportedly considering a run for the White House and his party’s chances of
keeping the White House depend on whether minorities and young voters who made
up Obama’s coalition turn out again with the same level of enthusiasm. Recent
polling
has found that non-white voters are less enthusiastic about the
2016 election than white voters who tend to lean more Republican.
Listen to Biden rattle
on with his nonstop “wisdom” about “diversity” and submerging and drowning
whites in a multicultural morass.
A flood of “cultural enrichers” on their way to your town

All of this is
linked to the massive immigration into the U.S. of especially Syrian “refugees,”
a group of Muslims too likely heavily saturated with ISIS operatives and
Muslims sympathetic to ISIS.  Patrick
Goodenough Family Security Matters writes in his October 2016 column, “12,2587
Syrian Refugees Admitted in FY 2016
.“


The administration admitted a total of 12,587 Syrian refugees during the
just-ended fiscal year, exceeding the target President Obama declared last fall
by 2,587 (20.5 percent).
Of the 12,587, the vast majority
are Sunni Muslims – 12,363 (98.2 percent) – while another 103 are identified in
State Department Refugee Processing Center data simply as Muslims and a further
20 as Shi’a Muslims.
Sixty-eight of the 12,587 Syrian
refugees (0.5 percent) are Christians. They comprise 16 Catholics, eight
Orthodox, five Protestants, four Jehovah’s Witnesses, one Greek Orthodox, and
34 refugees self-identified simply as Christians.
The remainder of the Syrian
refugees resettled in the U.S. in FY 2016 are 24 Yazidis, eight refugees with
religion given as “other,” and one with “no religion….”

All segments of the Syrian population are affected by the
devastating civil war, which has witnessed grave atrocities by minorities waged
by the Sunni jihadists as well as sectarian-fueled bloodshed involving Sunnis,
Shi’a (including Iranian and Hezbollah elements) and adherents of President
Bashar al-Assad’s Alawite sect….

Obama has not declared a target figure for
Syrian refugee admissions for FY 2017, although a recent report to Congress
said the administration “aims to admit a significantly higher number”
of Syrian refugees in the new fiscal year than the 10,000 target initially set
for FY 2016.
Assistant Secretary of State Anne Richard said
last week
that even though the department is working with a stipulated
target for FY 2017, “this administration has been very clear that we want
to bring more Syrians, so my own guidance to our staff is that we want to bring
even more than we brought this year.”
Over the course of the conflict that began
when small anti-government protests in early 2011 were met with a harsh
crackdown by the Assad regime and later widened into a convoluted civil war,
the U.S. has resettled a total of 14,460 Syrian refugees – 87 percent of them
during FY 2016.

Obama has surpassed his 10,000 Syrian refugee goal. Fred Fleitz of The
Center for Security Policy
reports:
The Obama administration
announced this week that President Obama’s November 2015 pledge to bring 10,000
Syrian refugees to this country has been met. Mr. Fleitz writes:
You may remember the Obama administration assured the
American people last year not to worry about the risk from these refugees
because processing them would take 18 to 24 months or longer.
I wrote in a November 20, 2015 Fox News.com op-ed
that processing of the 10,000 Syrian refugees President Obama agreed to admit
late last year probably would be sped up to ensure they arrived while he was
still in office and to prevent his successor from blocking these refugees.
This is what happened.  The Obama administration lied
again.

State Department officials defended the process to vet
Obama’s 10,000 refugees and insisted they are “the most thoroughly-screened
group of travelers to the U.S.”  So how did the Obama administration
resolve the problem expressed by CIA Director John Brennan in June 2016 when he
said in testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee that ISIS is training
operatives and attempting to enter the U.S. through “refugee flows, smuggling
routes and legitimate methods of travel?”

Obama officials are trying to reassure Americans that there
is little threat from President Obama’s 10,000 Syrian refugees because they
claim 78 percent are women and children.  Given that about 72 percent of
Syrian refugees arriving in Europe are military-age males, this is difficult to
believe.  I believe the administration is playing statistical games in the
way it counts these refugees.  There also could be another group of Syrian
adult male refugees that the Obama administration plans to quietly admit later,
probably after the election.
Admitting poorly-screened female Syrian refugees could
allow male ISIS members to immigrate to the United States through
“chain-migration” when these women refugees apply to admit male refugees who they
claim are husbands or blood relatives.  Without documentation, it will be
extremely difficult to confirm these claims.
Lying is par for the course on Obama’s
political golf course.  I doubt that
Hillary Clinton plays even ping-pong, but she is a congenital liar, as well.
And what about all those Somali “refugees”?  Patrick 
Goodenough on Family Security Matters reports again in “Almost
100,000 Somali Refugees Admitted to U.S. Since 9/11 and 99.6% were Muslim
.”
Almost 100,000 Somali refugees have been resettled in the
United States since 9/11, including 8,619 so far during the current fiscal
year. The largest number – some 16 percent of the total over the past 15 years
– have been resettled in Minnesota, home to the nation’s biggest
Somali-American community.
Of the 97,046 Somali refugees admitted to the U.S. since
the fall of 2001, 99.6 percent were Muslim, and 28,836 (29.7 percent)
were males between the ages of 14 and 50.
In FY 2015 Somalis were the third largest contingent of
refugees admitted to the U.S. – 8,858, or 12.6 percent of the total from around
the world. Only Burma, with 26.3 percent, and Iraq, with 18.1 percent,
accounted for larger groups of refugees arriving in the country.
The biggest influx of Somali refugees over the past 15
years occurred during the FY 2004-2006 period, after which the numbers dwindled
before picking up again from FY 2014-2016, State Department Refugee Processing
Center data show.

Given the cited numbers above, is the administration really expecting all these
“immigrants” to behave themselves and abide by the rule of law and American cultural
norm? I don’t think the administration knows or cares. Obama and Hillary just
want to subjugate the country and Americans to savagery, more “lone wolf”
terrorist attacks which the authorities will do their best to cover up, suppress
information, and lie through their teeth about, local and federal authorities, together.
And let’s not forget the small-time enablers, such as the mayor of Rutland,
Vermont, who has secretly arranged to “resettle” Syrians in his small town, and
kept the conspiracy from the town’s residents. 
Judicial Watch has this startling news: “Judicial
Watch: Federal Contractor Tells Local Official to Keep Syria Refugee Plans
Secret
.”

Judicial Watch today released 128
pages
of documents it obtained from the mayor of Rutland, Vermont, showing
a concerted effort by the mayor and a number of private organizations to
conceal from the public their plans to resettle 100 Syrian refugees into the
small southern Vermont town.
The documents include an April
14, 2016
, email from Amila Merdzanovic, executive director of the Vermont
Refugee Resettlement Program, to Mayor Christopher Louras, in which she wrote:
I want to share with you the
concern my HQ has about holding a public forum. If we open it up to anybody and
everybody, all sorts of people will come out of woodwork. Anti-immigrant,
anti-anything. They suggest that the forum be invite only but make it as wide
as possible. Work with faith leaders, United Way, etc… Perhaps, we could go
back to the Congregational Church and continue the conversation there.
The mayor and resettlement
organizations shrouded the plan in such secrecy that not even the town’s
aldermen were informed of what was taking place behind closed doors. The
aldermen eventually wrote to the U.S. Department of State protesting
the plan and opened an investigation
into the mayor’s actions. The State Department has not yet ruled on whether it
will resettle refugees in Rutland despite the aldermen’s protest.
Handwritten notes state that the
issue was, “Not what can ‘we’ do for ‘them,’ but what the diversity, cultural
richness do for the community.” The documents contain detailed
discussions
of what Rutland will need to provide for the refugees – including
housing, jobs, medical care, and places for worship.
Judicial Watch received the
documents in
response
to a Vermont
Public Records Law
request to the office of Mayor Christopher Louras.
Merdzanovic later told the Boston
Globe
that the hidden talks were “the right thing to do — to move
slowly, keep it to a small circle of people, and then expand.”
Yes, the “right thing to do” – to conform to
Clinton’s proposed policy of keeping “everyday Americans”
unaware
and compliant
.” But Rutland’s citizens are not complying and they are
definitely “aware.”
One can only wonder who are the true enemies
of the country: Muslims and their hostile ideology, or government officials on
various levels throughout the country and the MSM in collusion with the federal
(feral?) government , right down to small town mayors?

Previous

A Guest Post: Islamization Planned

Next

A Non-Politically Correct Bookshelf

1 Comment

  1. madmax

    Ed,

    When I read about the 1965 Immigration Act I get angry. First because it is clearly an example of the egalitarian philosophy destroying the West. But second, because I ask myself "how could have the Conservatives of the day ever believed the Left that the demographics wouldn't change?" How could they have believed Leftists? It dumbfounds me that people don't understand that the Left is a demonic movement. And Objectivists also don't see this. I guarantee you that most Objectivists are pro-1965 Immigration Act. For them its an example of "liberty".

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén