The Official Blog Of Edward Cline

The Bogeyman of Islam

Allah is greater than any other Bogeyman!
Allahu Akbar!

Few things set me off more than an utterly stupid, politically correct
statement about Islam; it causes me to tear out what little hair I have left,
it causes me to cuss a blue streak and employ a lexicon of purple language, it
transforms me into Harvey Wallbanger because it’s so perilously irrelevant. A Harvey
Wallbanger
, for those unfamiliar with cocktail argot, is a drink, a
Screwdriver topped with Galliano

The
mascot — named what else but Harvey Wallbanger — was a bleary-eyed, big-footed
dude who surfed, skydived, life-guarded and even ran for president, always
wearing a vacant expression of distress.
Dumb, cautious statements about Islam also leave me
bleary-eyed and big-footed, as well. Here is Britain’s Prime Minister Theresa
May on the terrorist attack on London’s Parliament and on the citizenry in
general, as reported by Fox
News
:
British
officials did not release the attacker’s identity or confirm a link with the
Islamic State group, though May did say it would be wrong to describe the
attack as “Islamic” extremism.
“It
is Islamist terrorism,” she said. “It
is a perversion of a great faith.”
Come again? You mean that after countless bombings, stabbings,
beheadings, rapes, attacks on Western art, all in the name of the great Islamic
Bogeyman in the Sky, Allah, the attacker was “perverting” a “great faith”?
The empty Nerf balls
rattling around in George W. Bush’s head are also ricocheting around Theresa
May’s. He claimed that on 9/11/01 the hijackers
and killers
had hijacked a great religion.
“Islam is a vibrant faith. Millions of our fellow citizens are Muslim.
We respect the faith. We honor its traditions. Our enemy does not. Our enemy
doesn’t follow the great traditions of Islam. They’ve hijacked a great
religion.”
Islam cannot be “perverted.” It is naturally perverted, by Western
standards of moral values and behavior. Islam “vibrates” with death. It
worships death. Its adherents dream of death. It is not “extreme,” no more than
Nazism or Communism were  “extreme.” They
were what they were and did not counsel “moderation.”  They were already “radical.” Islam is Islam.
A Bogeyman is a Bogeyman.  As
is Islam
.
As I noted in A
Complete Way of Death
”:
Lopez
and Lyons score Petreaus on his politically correct verbal soft-shoe about
Islam, pointing out that he overlooks or chooses to ignore the fact of the
Global Jihadist Movement (GJM), and that Islam is fundamentally not “religion of peace” that was
“hijacked” by “extremists.” Jihadists, they write,
…are
carrying out the core principles of Islam as specified in the Quran, Shariah
and the hadiths.
 Anyone who has bothered to peruse the Koran, Sharia law, and the hadiths, will
acknowledge that this is a true statement. I maintain a folder devoted
exclusively to violent Koranic
verses; there are over two hundred of them I could easily cite here. The core
principles reside in those verses and they are taken literally by jihadists of
the Sunni and Shi’ite branches of Islam – as they were meant to be taken and which do not leave any room for subtextual
interpretation. Those verses do not represent a guide to becoming flower
children, but rather to becoming conquerors and killers.
Britain
Against Islam
has published these politically correct talking points and
excuses for Islam that we can expect to hear ad nauseam in the coming days and weeks:
We all know the
protocol by now –
1. This has nothing to do with Islam.
2. The guy was a mentally ill ‘lone wolf’.
3. Those who object to points 1 and 2 are racist bigots.
4. Change Facebook profile to flag of inflicted country.
5. Light some candles, hold a vigil, and go on a
peace march.

6. Wait for the next slaughter to happen.
7. Repeat.
That being said, The
New York Times
reported this morning, March 23rd:
LONDON
— The Islamic State claimed responsibility on Thursday for the deadly
attack outside the British Parliament
, as Prime Minister Theresa May
described the assailant as a British-born man whom the country’s domestic
intelligence agency had investigated for connections to violent extremism.
The
London police identified him on Thursday afternoon as Khalid
Masood
, 52, who had a long criminal history but no terrorism convictions.
He had been living recently around Birmingham, England, where the vehicle used
in the attack was rented. The police released few other details about him…..
Barely
an hour after Mrs. May finished speaking, the Islamic
State group
issued a statement on the messaging app Telegram, declaring
that the attacker was a “soldier” who “carried out the operation in response to
appeals” to fight Western powers involved in military operations in the Middle
East.

Altruism can only succumb to
Islam
Will it ever dawn as a supernova in the minds of Theresa May and her reality-challenged
cohorts that it won’t matter if Britain is involved in military operations
against ISIS in the Middle East? Islam wants to destroy Western civilization
and then lord it over the ruins.
Yesterday, March 22nd, Katie Hopkins on the Daily
Mail
had a few words for all those refugee welcomers, multiculturalists,
and reality-resistant politicians like Theresa May.
They
lay in the centre of London, face down where they fell. Stabbed by a
knife, rammed with a car, flung, broken, into the Thames, life bleeding out on
the curb…..
This
place is just like Sweden. Terrified of admitting the truth about the threat we
face, about the horrors committed by the migrants we failed to deter — because
to admit that we are sinking, and fast, would be to admit that everything the
liberals believe is wrong.
That
multiculturalism has not worked. That it is one big fat failure and one big fat
lie.
President
Erdogan of Turkey said there is a war being waged between the crescent and the
cross. But he is wrong. Because the cross is not strong. We are down on bended
knee, a doormat to be trodden on, a joke only funny to those that wish us harm.
The
war is between London and the rest of the country. Between the liberals and the
right-minded. Between those who think it is more important to tip-toe around
the cultures of those who choose to join us, rather than defend our own
culture.

A Christian Lamb and an Islamic
Wolf
I will say this about the weak cross of
Christianity. It is not strong enough to combat the lethal blows of Islam. The
blows are lethal because altruism
is our current moral gold standard; Islam’s “victories” are by default. If
Christ had emerged when Islam began to rise, he would have been slaughtered by
Mohammad’s “soldiers.” There would be no “turning the other cheek” for Christ,
except when a Muslim took a knife to his neck and severed his head.
I will say this here: no religion is “great,” especially
not if it holds a Bogeyman in the Sky as the final moral arbiter and arranger
of existence, as all the major religions do.

Previous

Scrubbing the Mind of “Thought Crime”

Next

Once Upon a Time in the West

2 Comments

  1. Tom

    There is no radical Islam. There is only one Islam, which its adherents follow more, or less, faithfully.

  2. truthaboutislam

    The religion of peace named Islam is one among the mightiest religion in this world. And also the one that is misunderstood a lot for several reasons. Be it a propaganda of political or of economical unfolded at all times. Our mission is to spread truth about islam by clearing entire misconceptions and to disseminate virtuous good deeds that the Muslims actually practice.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén