I sent this query to Theresa May at 10 Downing
Street, London, a few days ago:

Is Theresa May a closet Muslim? Is she okay with
female genital mutilation? Honor killings or murders?  The rapes of white
British women and girls? Is she okay with Hamas? Hezbollah? Censorship?
 With not giving Islam the raspberries? Not calling Islam totalitarian and
evil? Would she have recommended to Hitler that members of The White Rose
be executed? Or that Tommy Robinson be murdered by Muslim prisoners?
From all the evidence of the imposition of
speech controls on Britain imposed by May, impositions punishable with arrest
and imprisonment if the controls are violated, one can only make an educated
guess that she is a closet Muslim. Sharia law is in the cards.
Recently, in the middle of last month, May
answered a question in Parliament about freedom of speech as a “cherished”
British liberty by qualifying her alleged value of it by stressing the role of
“tolerance” as a kind of twin that puts a necessary gag the freedom. The
implied object of the question was why criticism
of Christianity
was taken as a norm, but criticism of Islam was not.
May answered:
               “We value freedom of expression
and freedom of speech in this country. That is absolutely essential in
underpinning our democracy. But we also value tolerance to others. We also
value tolerance in relation to religions. This is one of the issues that we’ve
looked at in the counter-extremism strategy that the government has produced. I
think we need to ensure that, yes, it is right that people can have that
freedom of expression. But in doing so, that right has a responsibility, too.
And that is a responsibility to recognize the importance of tolerance to
Tolerance? Of what? Tolerance of Islam, to
May, must mean not criticizing it or any of its primitive, medieval, and patently
misogynic practices, such as FGM and rape at whim and by Koranic right.
Throwing gays off of roofs. Jihad Watch cites a source
of the Koranic
sanction of rape:

Courtesy of  Peggy Traeger

The Egyptian Sheikh Abu-Ishaq al-Huwayni declared in May 2011 that “we are in the era of jihad,” and
that meant Muslims would take slaves. In a subsequent interview he elaborated:
Jihad is only between Muslims and infidels.
Spoils, slaves, and prisoners are only to be taken in war between Muslims and
infidels. Muslims in the past conquered, invaded, and took over countries. This
is agreed to by all scholars—there is no disagreement on this from any of them,
from the smallest to the largest, on the issue of taking spoils and prisoners.
The prisoners and spoils are distributed among the fighters, which includes
men, women, children, wealth, and so on.
ISIS and
Islam in general have declared war on the West, a war that will never end until
Islam is refuted as a “religion” that deserves “respect” and “tolerance.”
August, ISIS
detained more than 5,000 Yazidi women in northern Iraq after
slaughtering thousands of members of the religious sect, according to the
United Nations.
Younger girls were separated from older
women, then bussed to the city of Mosul and put in a large three-story house
with hundreds of other young women, according to a witness who spoke to CNN in
November. ISIS men came periodically and chose up to three and four girls at a
time to take home with them.

What is said in the Koran about rape?
On this subject Theresa May is definitely not an “Islamophobe.” She strikes one
as a kind of “Aunt
,” a frumpish woman of conventional tastes and values, a second-hander
to the core. The overriding value today is “diversity, which she endorses, and  is a grab bag of cultural traditions and
practices, for the sake of diversity, not letting one cultural tradition and
practice become the norm in society.
There is
Iran, which has jailed women who refused or discarded  their head scarves.
reported that May did not wear a head scarf when she visited Saudi
Arabia in 2017:

Prime Minister Theresa May, turned heads on Tuesday when she arrived in Saudi
Arabia without wearing a headscarf – reportedly bucking the advice of her own
The photos showed May’s ankles and wrists
were covered. However, The Telegraph noted her outfit did not completely
comply with Foreign Office guidelines:  “Women
should wear conservative, loose-fitting clothes as well as a full length cloak
(abaya) and a headscarf.”
But she
certainly dons one when meeting with her British Muslim  “subjects.” Her “diversity” sympathies do not
extend to Iranian
women protesting
the hijab.
The Arab News in
January 2018 reported:
Iranian opposition leaders in the UK are “disgusted” at the failure of British
politicians, including Prime Minister Theresa May and Labour party leader
Jeremy Corbyn to condemn regime’s brutality as the death toll continues to
climb seven days after protests began in Iran.

“Both the prime minister and the opposition party here have stayed completely
silent when Iranian youth are being slaughtered in the streets of Iran,” said
Laila Jazayeri, director of the Association of Anglo-Iranian Women in the U.K.
May invariably adopts a “What? Me, worry?” mien when the subject  of Islamic
brutality at home
and abroad arises, which is daily. It isn’t happening to
her. The brutality occurs in a reality remote from her bubble of “diversity,”
so there is an unreality to it, and she will utter platitudes and bromides
present in the taquiyya
spiel that any “radicalized“ iman or mullah will concoct for public consumption.
It is a “prime
” of hers to defend and protect the Islamic faith at any cost, because
the altruist “moral imperative” of tolerance-through-diversity commands it. All
Britons must adhere to it, or else be labeled as bigoted racists (even though a
smidgen of awareness will reveal that Islam is not a race).
For all
practical purposes, Theresa May is as Muslim as Sadiq Kahn, the mayor of
London.  Is Sharia in the cards ? No. She’s already imposed  it.