A Muslim hand possessing
an infidel captive (Sura 4:24) Rape is an
right of Muslims. Mohammad said so.

Intrinsicism is a philosophical position that holds that an idea or
concept by its very nature has a specific value, and can be identified as not
only true or false but also inherently good or evil. However, Intrinsicism can
be associated with dogmatism i.e. An “Arrogant, stubborn
assertion of opinion or belief.”

An intrinsicist
does not require any rational proof of why an idea or action should be
categorized as true or false or particularly judged as good or evil.
An intrinsicist need not offer
any proof for why he states that an object or a person is good or evil, either.
Ayn Rand wrote in Capitalism:
The Unknown Ideal
are, in essence, three schools of thought
on the nature of the good: the
intrinsic, the subjective, and the objective. The intrinsic theory holds
that the good is inherent in certain things or actions as such, regardless of
their context and consequences, regardless of any benefit or injury they may
cause to the actors and subjects involved. It is a theory that divorces the
concept of “good” from beneficiaries, and the concept of “value” from valuer
and purpose—claiming that the good is good in, by, and of itself.
The intrinsic theory
holds that the good resides in some sort of reality, independent of man’s
If a man believes that the good is intrinsic
in certain actions, he will not hesitate to force others to perform them. If he
believes that the human benefit or injury caused by such actions is of no
significance, he will regard a sea of blood as of no significance. If he
believes that the beneficiaries of such actions are irrelevant (or
interchangeable), he will regard wholesale slaughter as his moral duty in the
service of a “higher” good. It is the intrinsic theory of values that produces
a Robespierre, a Lenin, a Stalin, or a Hitler. It is not an accident that
Eichmann was a Kantian.
An intrinsicist can make any
assertion he wishes: “That
of Robert E. Lee or Columbus
is evil and must be removed or destroyed” – “And all married women (are
forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess” The
Koranic verse: (Sura 4:24)  – “White people are evil. Whiteness
is evil
”. And the assertion, today, will be accepted as a written-in-stone
verity, no questions asked. Literally. To question an arbitrary assertion is to
flirt with violence against oneself.
The Left is governed by
intrinsicism when it points to whites and bellows that they are evil and
oppressive. Islam is governed by intrinsicism when it points to all infidels
and proclaims they are evil by virtue that they are ipso facto evil, exclusive
of everything else, as well. Period. End of argument. For the Left and Islam,
there is no argument.
This is why civil arguments
and calm deliberation between pro-freedom of speech advocates and the likes of
Antifa and Islam are worse than fruitless. 
Discussion is impossible.
They are beyond reclamation,
especially when they confess to being mentally unable to argue their positions.
When questioned about why they are against Trump or any pro-freedom policy or
idea, their minds become blank and all they can do is stammer the received and
unexamined Newspeak
line without the least sense of obligation to justify their positions or
 on September 3rd reported on one
significant instance of intrinsicism:
…that of Brad Sherman, a Democrat from
California … the guy who’s leading the impeachment charges in the House against
President Trump. He filed the articles of impeachment back in July,
claiming that Trump’s firing of former FBI Director James Comey
constituted “high crimes and misdemeanors,” as defined by the Constitution….
Anyway, when the topic of President Trump came
up, Sherman admitted to suffering from a full blown case of ‘Trump
derangement syndrome’:
“Then we have a Trump derangement syndrome
where — thank God he didn’t put out a message on Mother’s Day because
there would have been pressure on me to come out against Mother’s Day.”
Trump takes a position, then you must take an equally extreme and opposite
position. He’s for Mother’s Day, you must be against Mother’s Day. He’s for a
wall, you have to be for unlimited immigration from all places.”
So there, laid out in black and white, is the
legislative priority of Democrats in the House (and, some might argue, of Republicans
like Paul Ryan). If Trump is for it, Democrats have to be against it. Which
means that Democrats are against a host of issues important to most Americans,
like religious freedom and limits on late term abortions.
Anne Marie Waters, director of
Sharia Watch UK,
in October in 2016 during a talk in
Sweden, explained why Western politicians adopt and advocate suicidal policies
that guarantee the extinction of their countries or their virtual surrender, to
especially Islam. It is because they project their self-hatred (beginning at minute 18:15) and hatred
of their own countries onto their ideological enemies. This is a form of TDS
(Trump Derangement Syndrome) and intrinsicism.
It is also, as Waters
describes it, a form of narcissism and a mental
. They claim that they’re responsible for all the alleged crimes
committed against indigenous peoples in the colonialist period, even though
they might have been born decades and a perhaps a few centuries after the
period. Self-hatred is a way of “atoning” for the crimes, and it is a kind of virtue-signaling
penance they project on an entire population (especially if it is white) or on
an entire culture, especially if it is accomplished as Western culture is.

Virtue signaling: Doing penance for being white

Waters wrote in July 2016, in
her article “Leftism
is a Mental Illness
Anti-white sentiment is common among
Left-wingers, including among white activists; something I witnessed many times
during my years around politics. This is perfectly illustrated in the UK in an
English anti-Englishness that won’t, for example, celebrate the country’s national day
because a city is too “multicultural”
and it wouldn’t be feasible for
them to celebrate all cultures. The idea that English culture should have a
special place in England doesn’t appear to have been entertained. The city of
Bristol is an English city (with a council dominated by Labour) that refused to
celebrate England.
The hatred has even extended
to the realm of mathematics. Mathematics is racist. In May of 2017 Reason
magazine published an astonishing story, “New ‘Social
Justice’ Math Class Teaches Kids That Math Is Evil, Dehumanizing
The course was designed by Teach for America
and is offered through EdX, according
to Campus Reform.
It presupposes that math could be made more
interesting for students if it was infused with socially relevant themes.
That’s not a terrible assumption—maybe young people would like math better if
it was being taught in a language they understood. (If Olivia eats 10 pieces
of avocado toast every day, how long will it be until she can afford to move
out of her parent’s house?
sort of thing
But Teach for America thinks that
language is “social justice,” and has designed a course that makes
some startling claims about math.
“In western mathematics, our
ways of knowing include formalized reasoning or proof, decontextualization, and
algorithmic thinking, leaving little room for those having non-western
mathematical skills and thinking processes,” the training course claims.

The Islamic way of virtue signaling: Ashura

Those having no
thinking skills, mathematical or otherwise, had best fend for themselves, and
acquire some. But to expect the intrinsicist lame and the halt to think – those
with self-inflicted mental wounds – is to be “racist” and “oppressive.”
The plague of
intrinsicism is all around us today. It leaves most people helpless to counter
the systematic and blatant lunacy that is encouraged and spread by the MSM.