The ongoing abrogation of the Constitution
and the freedoms it was established to protect and guarantee is complemented by
the Islamic campaign to abrogate them, as well. What makes it possible are
multiculturalism (no culture is superior to others), political correctness
(many things are unmentionable, or mentionable only in euphemistic terms),
diversity (a Brunswick Stew of cultural traditions, social relationships, and
even political systems can enrich American culture and society), and
subjectivism (all systems of values, moral, political and even esthetic, are
mere prejudices, with no basis in reality).
Abrogation of the “peaceful” Koranic verses by the violent ones, and
the abrogation of the U.S. Constitution by Islamic Sharia law (not that Muslims
need any help from Congress and Obama to accomplish that) is an established
goal by all the Islamic organizations in the U.S.  But, first, let’s define the term. Merriam-Webster online:
:  to abolish
by authoritative action :  annul
:  to treat as
nonexistent <abrogating their responsibilities>
As virtually every Islamic scholar, past
and present, has preached, the later violent verses and
dictats in the Koran abolish the
earlier “peaceful” ones.  They
may as well have never existed, because the Koran especially was purported
dictated in its entirety into Mohammad’s ear, and Mohammad, an illiterate
bandit and killer, in turned supposedly dictated it to unknown scribes. (See
Robert Spencer’s book, Did
Muhammad Exist? An Inquiry Into Islam’s Obscure Origins
). The Koran really didn’t begin to be
assembled, collated, edited, expunged of “unauthentic” attributions,
and disseminated by Islamic scholars until centuries after Mohammad’s death.
Before examining how Islam would abrogate
our freedoms, we should examine some alternating examples of how the Koran abrogates its “peaceful”
verses with the abrogating ones (Nāsikh).
On imposing
jizya, or a poll or protection tax on
or Abrogated:
who believe in the unseen and keep up prayer and spend out of what We have
given them. 2:3
Abrogator (Nāsikh):
alms out of their property, you would cleanse them and purify them thereby, and
pray for them; surely your prayer is a relief to them; and Allah is Hearing,
or abrogated on Jews, Christians and other “infidels”:
those who believe, and those who are Jews, and the Christians, and the Sabians,
whoever believes in Allah and the Last day and does good, they shall have their
reward from their Lord, and there is no fear for them, nor shall they grieve. 2:62
A violent verse against unbelievers:
whoever desires a religion other than Islam, it shall not be accepted from him,
and in the hereafter he shall be one of the losers. 3:85   
“peaceful” verse about unbelievers:
when We made a covenant with the children of Israel: You shall not serve any
but Allah and (you shall do) good to (your) parents, and to the near of kin and
to the orphans and the needy, and you shall speak to men good words and keep up
prayer and pay the poor-rate. Then you turned back except a few of you and (now
too) you turn aside.  2:83
its antonym:
of the Sword
“peaceful” verse about fighting unbelievers:
kill them wherever you find them, and drive them out from whence they drove you
out, and persecution is severer than slaughter, and do not fight with them at
the Sacred Mosque until they fight with you in it, but if they do fight you,
then slay them; such is the recompense of the unbelievers. But if they desist,
then surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful. 2:191 and 2:192
we’d really rather go amok:
of the Sword 9:5
Islamic “tolerance”:
if they dispute with you, say: I have submitted myself entirely to Allah and
(so) everyone who follows me; and say to those who have been given the Book and
the unlearned people: Do you submit yourselves? So if they submit then indeed
they follow the right way; and if they turn back, then upon you is only the
delivery of the message and Allah sees the servants.  3:20
intolerance, enslavement, and the spoils of war:
Prophet! surely We have made lawful to you your wives whom you have given their
dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses out of those whom Allah has
given to you as prisoners of war, and the daughters of your paternal uncles and
the daughters of your paternal aunts, and the daughters of your maternal uncles
and the daughters of your maternal aunts who fled with you; and a believing
woman if she gave herself to the Prophet, if the Prophet desired to marry her–
specially for you, not for the (rest of) believers; We know what We have
ordained for them concerning their wives and those whom their right hands
possess in order that no blame may attach to you; and Allah is Forgiving,
Merciful.   9:5 and 33:50
for what unbelievers believe:
what is revealed to you from your Lord; there is no god but He; and withdraw
from the polytheists.

And if Allah had pleased, they would not have set up others (with Him) and We
have not appointed you a keeper over them, and you are not placed in charge of

And do not abuse those whom they call upon besides Allah, lest exceeding the
limits they should abuse Allah out of ignorance. Thus have We made fair seeming
to every people their deeds; then to their Lord shall be their return, so He
will inform them of what they did.    6:106 and 6:107

changes his mind:
of the Sword  9:5
On letting
unbelievers alone:
them that they may eat and enjoy themselves and (that) hope may beguile them,
for they will soon know.  15:3
of the Sword  9:5
patient with the unbelievers, they’re not your responsibility:
be patient and your patience is not but by (the assistance of) Allah, and
grieve not for them, and do not distress yourself at what they plan.  16:127
second thought:
of the Sword  9:5
goes on for several score more verses, about 113 of them. But, what is the “Verse of the Sword”?
But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and
slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie
in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish
regular prayers and practice regular charity, then open the way for them: for
Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.
As one “The Koran for Dummies”-like site, Abrogated
Verses of the Quran
, notes:
…We would like to
cite Brother Mark’s quotation of Muslim scholar Ahmad Von Denffer regarding the
conflicting views held by Muslim scholars over the precise nature of
abrogation:  Von Denffer defines it clearly as:
is Abrogated?
According to some scholars the Qur’an abrogates only the Qur’an. They base
their view on suras 2:106 and 16:101. According to them the Qur’an does not
abrogate the sunna nor does the sunna abrogate the Qur’an. This is, in
particular, the view held by Shafi’i.
Others are of the opinion that the Qur’an may abrogate the Qur’an as well as
the sunna. They base their view on Sura 53:3-4.

There is also the view that there are four classes of naskh:

1 Qur’an abrogates Qur’an.
2 Qur’an abrogates sunna.
3 Sunna abrogates Qur’an.
4 Sunna abrogates sunna.” (Ulum,
Von Denffer, p. 107f)
The ‘founding’
scholars couldn’t even agree in ‘basic principles’ over what abrogates what
between the Sunnah and Qur’an! (Brother Mark, A ‘Perfect’ Qur’an,
p. 230, online
Oh, yes. Allah is “oft-forgiving, and
most merciful,” except when it comes to dealing with non-Muslims (Sunnis
vs. Shi’ites), Jews, Christians, atheists, gays, American journalists, British school
girls, Christian nuns, Yazidis, Saudis, Iranians, Copts, and a very long list
of others who must be fought, slain, seized, raped, beleaguered and
Now, when you read the whole list of
“peaceful” verses, what strikes one is their concrete-bound banality.
Aside from advising Muslims to more or less chew their food thoroughly, of letting
the dice roll where they may (with “Allah’s blessing”), of letting
the infidels stew in their own juices, of washing behind one’s ears, and of not
stepping on camel dung, these are the discombobulated dictats, musings, ravings,
and advisories of a certified idiot high on date punch spiked with an
hallucinatory drug.   
When one reads the whole list of the violent, abrogating verses, one is
struck by their psychotic petulance, vindictiveness, hatred, and homicidal
Islam, however, on the whole, is
totalitarian ideology, which governs one’s life from birth to death, from head
to toe, from friendship to animosity, from what is lawful (Sharia),
what is permissible (halal) and what
is not. If one were to assign percentiles to the focus of Christians and Jews
on their religions tenets vs. the focus of Muslims, Christians and Jews would
compartmentalize their religion by 20%, allowing them to see to their daily
concerns without the tenets interfering. Their religion is effectively
side-lined. Muslims, however, could be assigned 80%, which does not allow them
to see to their daily affairs without conforming to Islamic tenets and forming
all their societal relationships governed by Islam.
The U.S. Constitution, on the other hand,
is not a document that features concrete-bound dictats, musings, or advisories.
It is governed by abstract principles applied to the political relationship
between men with the end being the protection and guarantee of individual
rights and the delimiting scope of force that can be permitted by government in
pursuit of those ends.  The Bill of
Rights was added to dispel any possible ambiguity or misinterpretation about the
document’s purpose. But, as many imams in America have claimed, as well as
spokesmen for the various Islamic organizations in the country, the end-game of
any Islamic presence in this country
is to replace the Constitution with Sharia law. Ryan Mauro wrote last July, in
his article on the Clarion Project, “Popular
U.S. Imam: Constitution Inferior to Sharia
While you were
spending Memorial Day Weekend barbequing and honoring the U.S. servicemen who
gave their lives for the country,18,000 people attended an annual Muslim-American
conference in Connecticut. An additional 14,000 watched online. And the message
they heard from one prominent speaker was particularly offensive in light of
the holiday: The U.S. Constitution is inferior to Islamic Sharia Law. 
The imam is named Zaid
Shakir; he’s no stranger to readers of the Clarion Project. We’ve documented his
Islamist ideology and anti-American
Despite the shredding apart of his “moderate” costume, he continues to be a
sought-after speaker at Islamic venues across the country. He’s also chairman
of Zaytuna College in California, the subject of a recent New
York Times
He spoke at the annual Islamic
Circle of North America-Muslim American Society
 conference on May 25
at the Hartford Convention Center in Connecticut.
Mauro goes on to note:
U.S. Muslim Brotherhood memo
, which defines its “work in America is a kind
of grand jihad in
eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within,” lists ICNA as
one of its fronts. Predictably, ICNA demands that the U.S. cut off military aid to Egypt in
retaliation for the military’s overthrow of the Muslim
The subject of his
speech was “The Legitimacy of Secularism” and a video of his speech has been posted online.  It
was an attack on secularism, modernity and how the U.S. Constitution based
“membership” on equal citizenship instead of religion. “One of the great
dilemmas of modernity is that it pits rootless freedom … you can do anything
you want in a liberal free society, as long as it does not violate the rights
of others … that freedom creates a state of rootlessness.” (7:15-9:00)
Meanwhile, in an exercise of back-pedaling taqiyya (of saying one thing to the face
of an infidel, but meaning just the opposite, or of just plain lying), Omar
Ahmad, former chairman of the Hamas-connected Council on American-Islamic Relations
(CAIR), denies having said in 1998,
“Islam isn’t in
America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant,” and, “The
Koran, the Muslim book of scripture, should be the highest authority in
America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.”

Art Moore, in his December 2006 WND
article, “Did CAIR Founder Say
Islam to rule America?
” details the denial not only by Ahmad, but by
CAIR and other Islamic organizations. Lisa Gardiner, then a reporter for the
Fremont, California Argus, stands by her statement that Ahmad said it. But CAIR
and other Islamic spokesmen scrambled in panic.
Ahmad told the
Muslim leaders – and WND in an interview – the attribution is a “total
fabrication” and assured them the newspaper, the Fremont Argus in California,
issued a “clarification” after he “challenged” reporter Lisa Gardiner.
That seemed to
satisfy the Muslim leaders, but Gardiner told WND she continues to stand by the story, and Editor Steve
Waterhouse said he’s confident she got it right. After hearing that news
Thursday, one of the Muslim leaders immediately resurrected the issue with his
colleagues, declaring Ahmad and CAIR need to find a way “to extinguish this
“She was a good,
solid reporter,” Waterhouse said of Gardiner. “She was absolutely certain about
what he said and what she reported.”
Ahmad let the cat out of the bag. CAIR and
others hurried to recapture the cat and make certain it was drowned. Call it an
emergency act of abrogation in emulation with the Koran itself.
It isn’t bad enough that President Barack Obama
wishes to “transform” America into a socialist “republic.” His
administration is top-heavy
with Muslims, far out of proportion of a census of Muslims living in this
country, nearly three million
out of a population of nearly 320
. His abuse of presidential executive powers marks him as a wannabe
caliph with a weakness for the infidel sport of golf, but who intends to rule regardless of Congress, the American
public, and Constitutional limits on his powers.

For the longest time, American politicians have beleaguered individual rights
and freedom with a multitude of stratagems. Over the last several decades, Islam
has allied itself with that incremental erasure of our rights and the