The Official Blog Of Edward Cline

The Venom of the SPLC


The “Palestinians
are a hate group. Across the board in Gaza and the West Bank and elsewhere,
they call for killing Jews and destroying the State of Israel.  
The #Resistance
is a hate group. It refuses to acknowledge the election of Donald Trump, even
to the point of questioning his physical and mental fitness to be President,
and includes in that mantra the implied accusation that Dr. Ronny Jackson, who
examined Trump, is lying. It is willing to say anything to damage Trump, no
matter how irrational and unproven.
Antifa is a
hate group. The visual evidence is ample. Masked thugs attack individuals who
want to see and hear someone the group disapproves of; destroy property with
glee, and calls “fascist” (as though the thugs knew what real “fascists” were
in the past) anyone who opposes them.  Antifa thugs should take Pogo’s complaint to
heart;”We have seen the enemy and he is us.” Not that doing such would give
them second thoughts. Their minds are the property of leftist ideology.
Democratic congressmen who
oppose President Trump comprise a hate group.
Any group that does not
disavow its unremitting, obsessive hatred for Trump is a hate group.
Hate Group map derived from the SPLC
Yet it will not be classified
as a “hate group” by the Southern
Poverty Law
Center (SPLC).  This and
other groups  get a free pass because
they hate Trump and spew their hatred to another level of ranting insanity. My
argument is that any government authority that suppresses freedom of speech
across the globe is a “hate group,” any group that offers “resistance” to
freedom of speech is a “hate group,” any individual who rants irrationality
against President Trump is a one-man “hate group” and could said to be in the
grip of “Trumpophobia.”

Like the saliva of an Indonesian
Komodo dragon
injected into a bite victim, the toxin is supposed to cause a fatal and a certain,
helpless death. The dragons are attracted to the putrefaction of the bodies of
their victims. Much as the Democrats are.

Articles have surfaced that
claim that the SPLC
is by definition a “hate group” itself, because its chief purpose today is to
establish and publish lists of names that hate groups can target for hateful
action. This is a charge which cannot be denied by the SPLC. Virtually the only
time it makes news headlines today is when it has declared certain individuals
– such as Pamela Geller, Richard Spencer,
Ayaan Hirsi Ali – and numerous
blogs that critique Islam, as “Islamophobes” or as “hate groups.” They commit “hate
crimes” and must be sent to the slammer. Never mind that Geller is under a
constant fatwa to behead her, that Spencer was poisoned in Iceland, and that
Hirsi Ali survived the worst of Sharia for a woman, female genital mutilation.
So, what is a “hate crime”?
A hate crime (also
known as a bias-motivated crime or bias crime[1]) is a
prejudice-motivated
crime, usually violent, which occurs when a perpetrator targets a
victim because of his or her membership (or perceived membership) in a certain social
group
or race.
Examples of such groups can include and are
almost exclusively limited to: sex, ethnicity, disability,
language, nationality,
physical appearance, religion, gender
identity
or sexual orientation. Non-criminal actions that
are motivated by these reasons are often called “bias
incidents
“.
“Hate crime” generally refers to criminal acts which
are seen to have been motivated by bias against one or more of the social groups listed above, or
by bias against their derivatives. Incidents may involve physical assault,
damage to property, bullying, harassment, verbal
abuse
or insults,
mate
crime
or offensive graffiti or letters (hate mail).
What is “Islamophobia”? What
is the term’s origin?
The term “Islamophobia” was invented
and promoted in the early 1990s
by the International
Institute for Islamic Thought
(IIIT), a front group of the Muslim
Brotherhood
. Former IIIT member Abdur-Rahman Muhammad — who was with that
organization when the word was formally created, and who has since rejected
IIIT’s ideology — now reveals
the original intent behind the concept of Islamophobia: “This loathsome term is
nothing more than a thought-terminating cliché conceived in the bowels of
Muslim think tanks for the purpose of beating down critics.” In short, in its
very origins, “Islamophobia” was a term designed as
a weapon
to advance a totalitarian cause by stigmatizing critics and
silencing them.

The SPLC and its cultural kin
would say, “Our hate is legitimate,
and justified. It’s for a universal, humanitarian purpose.” In practice and in
fact, it is a tool and a weapon to denigrate anyone who questions the
“peaceful” ends of Islam, and is who is critical of its totalitarian designs
and methods. Anyone who has bothered to examine Islam would almost evidently
fear it and not conclude it was just another “belief system.”  It would be as much as examining a
rattlesnake.

The SPLC apparently is not
bothered by being labeled a “hate group.” Leftists are, by their nature, not
chagrined or embarrassed by the charge of being totalitarian.
The trick the SPLC plays is to
group legitimate criticism with actual hate groups and hope readers do not
wonder why Pamela Geller is linked to the likes of the Skinheads, the Neo-Nazis, and
the KKK.
The venom of the SPLC suits
the MSM because they don’t need to do anything. It fits their agenda. The SPLC
has done the “research” for them. If the SPLC says an individual or group is
driven by hate, that’s the end of their inquiry, other than perhaps taking a brief
glance at the targeted site to confirm that what they see they don’t like and
would prefer to see prohibited and outlawed. Facts. Reason.  Logic. Cause-and-effect.  Syllogisms.  
The Democratic Party

These are all minefields, and any one, of
them, if stepped on by Dems, will explode their arguments and their assumed intellectual
acuity (if they possess any), and expose their substance of straw and old rags
and habitual dissembling lizards. Dems are “fake persons” and “fake”
Congressional representatives. The Dems were in
favor
of perpetuating slavery during and after the Civil War up to the
present. They continue to perpetuate it.

They can always depend on “party-loyalty”
for votes.

Previous

Totalitarians vs. Deplorables

Next

The OIC’s Censorship

1 Comment

  1. Tom

    All true. The SPLC are professional smearers. They've risen to the pinnacle of the hate business — hate groups, hate crimes, terms they apply to any group or any action with which they disagree. Rocket scientists they ain't.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén